# Dutch Electrical Power Numbers part 2

DevFeed: [Dutch Electrical Power Numbers part 2](<https://devfeed.tech/articles/dutch-electrical-power-numbers-part-2-36370.md>)

Original publisher: [Read original article](<https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/dutch-electrical-power-figures-2/>)

Published: 2022-04-14T19:44:21Z

Content type: opinion

Language: en

Sources: [Bert Hubert's writings](<https://devfeed.tech/sources/bert-hubert-s-writings.md>)

Topics: [data](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/data.md>), [Network](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/network.md>)

Tags: [data](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/data.md>), [energy](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/energy.md>), [network](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/network.md>), [solar](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/solar.md>), [statement](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/statement.md>), [transmission](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/transmission.md>), [transparency](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/transparency.md>), [tso](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/tso.md>)

## AI overview

The article examines inconsistencies and gaps in Dutch electrical power-generation data reported by TenneT to the ENTSO-E transparency platform. It discusses potentially incomplete or unclear figures for solar, onshore wind, fossil gas, and the "Other" category, while noting TenneT's explanation that unidentified or unavailable generation may be grouped or omitted.

## Source excerpt

In an earlier post I presented a naive model for estimating Dutch electrical solar power generation numbers. It turns out that the Dutch electrical power generation numbers are an even bigger mess than I appreciated. It appears that "everyone knows" that the numbers are confusing, incomplete and perhaps even wrong. But somehow this state of confusion isn't written down anywhere. So I'll give it a shot. A round of thanks to a small number of anonymous industry insiders that provided invaluable help!