# automation-testing Published articles for automation-testing. This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles. ## BrowserStack Newsletter July 2026 DevFeed: [BrowserStack Newsletter July 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Devanshi Jain Published: 2026-08-05T10:02:29Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [BrowserStack Blog]() Topics: [Testing](), [Test automation](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Playwright](), [Selenium](), [Cypress](), [ide](), [Application Performance Management (APM)](), [dashboards](), [Extension](), [Emulator](), [simulator]() Tags: [2026](), [agentic-ai](), [automation](), [automation-testing](), [cursor](), [cypress](), [features](), [ide](), [newsletter](), [product](), [selenium](), [testing]() ### AI overview BrowserStack's July 2026 newsletter announces Test Companion, an agentic AI feature for IDE-based test automation, and BrowserStack Load Testing, which combines backend load generation, real-browser performance, and APM metrics. It also highlights updates for certificates, screenshots, emulators, simulators, mobile browsers, Chrome extensions, audio logs, and diagnostic data. ### Source excerpt Read what's new at BrowserStack in July 2026 - New launches, product features, and more! ## Everything You Need to Know About Patrol in 2026 DevFeed: [Everything You Need to Know About Patrol in 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: LeanCode Published: 2026-07-24T02:52:52Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Flutter Community - Medium]() Topics: [Flutter](), [Mobile Testing](), [ui-testing](), [multiplatform](), [ci](), [Android](), [iOS](), [Web](), [Open Source]() Tags: [ai](), [android](), [automation-testing](), [ci](), [e2e-testing](), [flutter](), [flutter-app-development](), [ios](), [mobile](), [mobile-testing](), [multiplatform](), [open-source](), [ui-testing](), [web]() ### AI overview This article explains Patrol, an open-source multiplatform end-to-end UI testing framework for Flutter apps. It describes how Patrol combines Flutter testing APIs with native Android and iOS UI automation to test Flutter widgets alongside system dialogs, biometric prompts, notifications, and other native interfaces, while integrating with CI pipelines and device farms. ### Source excerpt Author: Katarzyna Szulc from LeanCode Patrol has come a long way from being "just another Flutter testing tool." Today, it powers end-to-end testing across Android, iOS, and Web, integrates with native testing infrastructure, runs on cloud device farms, offers AI-powered testing capabilities, and continues to push the boundaries of what's possible in the Flutter ecosystem. No matter if you've been following Patrol for a while or you're simply looking for the best way to handle Flutter E2E testing, this article is the perfect place to catch up. What exactly is Patrol? Let's break it down Developed by LeanCode, Patrol is a powerful, open-source, multiplatform E2E UI testing framework for Flutter apps that overcomes the limitations of integration_test by handling native interactions. Let's dig deeper into that. Flutter's greatest strength also creates one of its biggest testing challenges. Unlike native apps, Flutter renders its entire UI using its own graphics engine instead of platform-native components. This enables a consistent, pixel-perfect experience across devices, but it also means that native UI automation tools often see a Flutter app as little more than a single canvas. They simply cannot interact with Flutter widgets. The official solution is the integration_test package, which gives tests direct access to the Flutter widget tree. As long as everything happens inside Flutter, it works well. But real apps rarely stay there. System permission dialogs, biometric prompts, notifications, WebViews, and other native UI all exist outside the Flutter runtime, making them inaccessible to integration_test. Patrol bridges this gap. It lets tests interact with both Flutter widgets and native UI elements in a single test. Because Patrol builds on native frameworks such as JUnit and XCTest, it also integrates seamlessly with existing CI pipelines, device farms, and the broader mobile testing ecosystem. If you are new to automating E2E testing in Flutter, you can start by ## BrowserStack wins 2026 Top Rated Award from TrustRadius DevFeed: [BrowserStack wins 2026 Top Rated Award from TrustRadius]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: BrowserStack Team Published: 2026-06-18T08:37:16Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [BrowserStack Blog]() Topics: [Testing](), [Software Testing](), [browser](), [Automation](), [Accessibility]() Tags: [2026](), [accessibility](), [automation](), [automation-testing](), [browser](), [company](), [customers](), [reviews](), [software-testing](), [testing]() ### AI overview BrowserStack announces that it received the 2026 TrustRadius Top Rated Award, its fourth consecutive win since 2023. The article cites a trScore of 8.4 out of 10 and more than 260 verified reviews, with recognition across accessibility testing, automation testing, cross-browser testing, functional testing, and test management. ### Source excerpt We are so excited to share that authentic, verified feedback from our customers has earned us a 2026 Top Rated Award by TrustRadius! ## Agentic Testing: Where Agents Fit in the E2E Testing Stack DevFeed: [Agentic Testing: Where Agents Fit in the E2E Testing Stack]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Sergii Gorbachov Published: 2026-06-11T14:15:28Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Engineering at Slack]() Topics: [Playwright](), [Model Context Protocol](), [large-language-models](), [User Interfaces]() Tags: [agentic](), [agents](), [automation-testing](), [browser](), [code](), [cost](), [developer-productivity](), [e2e-testing](), [innovation](), [language-models](), [large-language-models](), [mcp](), [speed](), [testing](), [uncategorized](), [workflow]() ### AI overview The article examines agent-driven end-to-end testing as an exploratory complement to deterministic tests. Based on more than 200 runs using Playwright MCP, Playwright CLI, and agent-generated Playwright tests, it compares how agents pursue goals through variable UI paths and considers reliability, execution time, and cost. ### Source excerpt Abstract Agent-driven end-to-end (E2E) tests add a new exploratory layer to testing, but should they replace traditional deterministic tests? We ran more than 200 agentic E2E workflows using the Playwright MCP, Playwright CLI, and agent-generated Playwright tests in test workspaces using non-production data to find out how agentic testing could fit into both our and... ## Updating to .NET 8, updating to IHostBuilder, and running Playwright Tests within NUnit headless or headed on any OS DevFeed: [Updating to .NET 8, updating to IHostBuilder, and running Playwright Tests within NUnit headless or headed on any OS]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Scott Hanselman Published: 2024-03-07T01:12:13Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Scott Hanselman]() Topics: [Playwright](), [.NET](), [Testing](), [Browser Automation](), [Integration testing](), [ASP.NET](), [Selenium](), [GitHub Actions]() Tags: [asp-net](), [automation-testing](), [browser](), [ci-cd](), [debug](), [devops](), [dotnetcore](), [integration](), [linux](), [net](), [playwright](), [selenium](), [testing](), [tests](), [unit-testing](), [visual-studio](), [vs-code](), [web](), [windows]() ### AI overview A tutorial on updating a .NET application to .NET 8 and running Playwright browser tests through NUnit. It explains the transition from IWebHostBuilder to IHostBuilder and describes cross-platform, headless or headed testing across local systems, containers, and CI environments. ### Source excerpt I've been doing not just Unit Testing for my sites but full on Integration Testing and Browser Automation Testing as early as 2007 with Selenium. Lately, however, I've been using the faster and generally more compatible Playwright. It has one API and can test on Windows, Linux, Mac, locally, in a container (headless), in my CI/CD pipeline, on Azure DevOps, or in GitHub Actions. For me, it's that last moment of truth to make sure that the site runs completely from end to end. I can write those Playwright tests in something like TypeScript, and I could launch them with node, but I like running end unit tests and using that test runner and test harness as my jumping off point for my .NET applications. I'm used to right clicking and "run unit tests" or even better, right click and "debug unit tests" in Visual Studio or VS Code. This gets me the benefit of all of the assertions of a full unit testing framework, and all the benefits of using something like Playwright to automate my browser. In 2018 I was using WebApplicationFactory and some tricky hacks to basically spin up ASP.NET within .NET (at the time) Core 2.1 within the unit tests and then launching Selenium. This was kind of janky and would require to manually start a separate process and manage its life cycle. However, I kept on with this hack for a number of years basically trying to get the Kestrel Web Server to spin up inside of my unit tests. I've recently upgraded my main site and podcast site to .NET 8. Keep in mind that I've been moving my websites forward from early early versions of .NET to the most recent versions. The blog is happily running on Linux in a container on .NET 8, but its original code started in 2002 on .NET 1.1. Now that I'm on .NET 8, I scandalously discovered (as my unit tests stopped working) that the rest of the world had moved from IWebHostBuilder to IHostBuilder five version of .NET ago. Gulp. Say what you will, but the backward compatibility is impressive. As such my code for Progr ## Building Reliable Mobile Applications DevFeed: [Building Reliable Mobile Applications]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Mustafa Ali Published: 2020-08-14T15:37:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Shopify Engineering](), [Shopify Engineering - Shopify Engineering]() Topics: [App](), [ci](), [Back end]() Tags: [automation-testing](), [mobile](), [production](), [review](), [shopify](), [testing]() ### AI overview The article describes Shopify's approach to making its mission-critical POS mobile app more reliable. It emphasizes automated testing in continuous integration, targeted manual testing for hardware-related workflows, and code reviews to catch issues early. ### Source excerpt Merchants worldwide rely on Shopify's Point Of Sale (POS) app to operate their brick and mortar stores. Unlike many mobile apps, the POS app is mission-critical. Any downtime leads to long lineups, unhappy customers, and lost sales. The POS app must be exceptionally reliable, and any outages resolved quickly. Reliability engineering is a well-solved problem on the server-side. Back-end teams are able to push changes to production several times a day. ## Automatic Stubbing of Network Requests to Deflakify Automation Testing DevFeed: [Automatic Stubbing of Network Requests to Deflakify Automation Testing]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2018-01-26T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [SoundCloud Backstage Blog]() Topics: [Testing](), [automation-testing](), [Xcode](), [API](), [JSON](), [Extension]() Tags: [api](), [automation-testing](), [debugging](), [dependency](), [extensions](), [ios](), [json](), [mobile](), [network](), [testing](), [ui-testing](), [web](), [xcode]() ### AI overview This article explains how SoundCloud reduced flakiness in Xcode UI automation tests by automatically recording and replaying network responses. The approach isolates tests from changing live web-service data and connectivity problems by stubbing responses with JSON files, injecting the test session, and providing a lightweight recording and replay API without adding another dependency. ### Source excerpt Apple introduced automated UI testing in Xcode 7. This was a great addition for developers because this native support promised, among other things, an improvement in the flakiness notoriously associated with automation tests. As many of us developers have experienced, tests can sometimes fail even when there has been no modification to the test or underlying feature code.