# boltdb

Published articles for boltdb.

This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles.

## 【分布式系统百科】etcd 深度解剖：从 Watch 机制到 MVCC 存储引擎

DevFeed: [【分布式系统百科】etcd 深度解剖：从 Watch 机制到 MVCC 存储引擎](<https://devfeed.tech/articles/etcd-watch-mvcc-33979.md>)

Original publisher: [Read original article](<https://quant67.com/post/distributed/50-etcd/etcd.html>)

Author: Liao Tonglang

Published: 2026-04-13T00:00:00Z

Content type: article

Language: zh

Sources: [土法炼钢 - 系统与基础设施](<https://devfeed.tech/sources/source-4.md>)

Topics: [etcd](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/etcd.md>), [Kubernetes](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/kubernetes.md>), [Raft](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/raft.md>)

Tags: [apiserver](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/apiserver.md>), [boltdb](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/boltdb.md>), [compaction](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/compaction.md>), [distributed](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/distributed.md>), [distributed-coordination](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/distributed-coordination.md>), [distributed-systems](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/distributed-systems.md>), [etcd](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/etcd.md>), [kubernetes](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/kubernetes.md>), [lease](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/lease.md>), [mvcc](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/mvcc.md>), [raft](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/raft.md>), [revision](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/revision.md>), [streaming](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/streaming.md>), [watch](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/watch.md>)

### AI overview

This article explains etcd's persistent Watch mechanism, revision-based event replay, MVCC storage, and its relationship with Raft and WAL. It also describes how Kubernetes components use etcd Watch events to propagate Deployment and Pod changes, and discusses compaction limits and recovery through full resynchronization.

### Source excerpt

深入剖析 etcd 的核心机制：持久化 Watch 与 Revision 追溯、Lease 租约机制、基于 BoltDB 的 MVCC 存储引擎、与 Raft 共识的联动方式，以及在 Kubernetes 中的关键角色。涵盖性能调优策略、容量限制与规模化方案。

## 【分布式系统百科】分布式 KV 存储对比：etcd、TiKV 与 FoundationDB

DevFeed: [【分布式系统百科】分布式 KV 存储对比：etcd、TiKV 与 FoundationDB](<https://devfeed.tech/articles/kv-etcd-tikv-foundationdb-33978.md>)

Original publisher: [Read original article](<https://quant67.com/post/distributed/39-kv-stores/kv-stores.html>)

Author: Liao Tonglang

Published: 2026-04-13T00:00:00Z

Content type: comparison

Language: zh

Sources: [土法炼钢 - 系统与基础设施](<https://devfeed.tech/sources/source-4.md>)

Topics: [etcd](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/etcd.md>), [Raft](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/raft.md>), [Kubernetes](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/kubernetes.md>)

Tags: [bbolt](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/bbolt.md>), [boltdb](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/boltdb.md>), [compaction](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/compaction.md>), [coreos](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/coreos.md>), [distributed](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/distributed.md>), [distributed-systems](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/distributed-systems.md>), [errcompacted](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/errcompacted.md>), [etcd](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/etcd.md>), [go](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/go.md>), [k8s](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/k8s.md>), [kubernetes](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/kubernetes.md>), [lease](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/lease.md>), [mmap](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/mmap.md>), [mvcc](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/mvcc.md>), [raft](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/raft.md>), [readindex](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/readindex.md>), [revision](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/revision.md>), [single-raft-group](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/single-raft-group.md>), [ssd](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/ssd.md>), [v3](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/v3.md>), [wal](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/wal.md>), [watch](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/watch.md>)

### AI overview

This Chinese-language comparison examines etcd, TiKV, and FoundationDB as distributed key-value stores for metadata. It focuses on architecture, implementation, performance, and limitations, with detailed coverage of etcd's single Raft group, MVCC, Watch, Lease, bbolt storage engine, linearizable reads, compaction, and defragmentation.

### Source excerpt

一个典型的架构评审场景：团队需要一个分布式键值存储来承载新系统的元数据。候选方案三个----etcd、TiKV、FoundationDB。三者都提供强一致性保证，都经过大规模生产验证，但设计目标截然不同。选错了，轻则性能不达标，重则数据丢失后无法恢复。这篇文章从架构、实现、性能和局限四个维度，把三个系统拆开来看。