# Commentary

Published articles for Commentary.

This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles.

## EU Kids Act Won't Keep the Internet Accountable and Trustworthy

DevFeed: [EU Kids Act Won't Keep the Internet Accountable and Trustworthy](<https://devfeed.tech/articles/eu-kids-act-won-t-keep-the-internet-accountable-and-trustworthy-55816.md>)

Original publisher: [Read original article](<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/09/eu-kids-act-wont-keep-internet-accountable-and-trustworthy>)

Author: Christoph Schmon

Published: 2026-09-21T12:27:52Z

Content type: opinion

Language: en

Sources: [Deeplinks](<https://devfeed.tech/sources/deeplinks.md>)

Topics: [Internet](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/internet.md>), [Protection](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/protection.md>), [Risk](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/risk.md>), [recommendation systems](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/recommendation-systems.md>), [Users](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/users.md>), [Artificial Intelligence](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/ai.md>), [Requirements](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/requirements.md>)

Tags: [ai](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/ai.md>), [commentary](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/commentary.md>), [complex](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/complex.md>), [compliance](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/compliance.md>), [eu](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/eu.md>), [european-union](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/european-union.md>), [free-speech](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/free-speech.md>), [international](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/international.md>), [privacy](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/privacy.md>), [recommender-systems](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/recommender-systems.md>), [safety](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/safety.md>), [users](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/users.md>), [verification](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/verification.md>)

### AI overview

An opinion argues that the proposed EU Kids Act would protect children through age-based access rules, safety requirements, and stronger oversight, but would also impose broad age gates and intrusive age verification. It contends that these measures could undermine user privacy, civil liberties, and access to online services.

### Source excerpt

The EU Commission draft law to restrict young people's access to the internet that it presented last week will come at a high cost: it will put online services behind age gates, expand the use of intrusive age verification, and undermine the privacy of all users. The EU Kids Act aims to protect children from risks associated with social media, video games, and AI systems by introducing age-based access rules, safety requirements, and stronger enforcement and oversight measures. It presents itself as building on the Digital Services Act (DSA) and puts into "hard law" some of the safety-by-design measures specified in the non-binding DSA guidelines on minors' protection. The proposal is built around the following elements: social media age "delay", safety by design, age assurance and parental responsibility, and strong enforcement. Each of these measures are concerning. Mandatory Age Gates for Social Media and Video-Sharing Platforms Following the advice of an expert panel, the proposal would create a phased access to social media and video-sharing platforms deemed risky--a threshold met simply by relying on personalized recommender systems or offering "uninterrupted content consumption": no service accounts for children under 13; restricted accounts under tight parental supervision from 13 to 15; and autonomous accounts in a safe-by-design environment from 15 to 18. Full online access is therefore reserved for adults. However they're designed, age gates undermine civil liberties, reduce safety, and create barriers to internet entry, often at the expense of marginalized groups. If this sounds complex and like a compliance nightmare, that's because it is. The access delay comes with privacy-intrusive age verification across the board, relying on the EU age verification scheme. For teenagers, this law means significant control in the hands of their parents, who must set up accounts and prove that they are, in fact, parents, adding yet another problematic layer of verific