# elon musk Published articles for elon musk. This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles. ## Nitter's repository was archived on September 11, 2026 DevFeed: [Nitter's repository was archived on September 11, 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Richard Speed Published: 2026-09-15T15:12:59Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [www.theregister.com - Articles]() Topics: [X (Twitter)]() Tags: [2026](), [elon-musk](), [personal-tech](), [twitter]() ### AI overview The supplied evidence reports that Nitter's repository was archived on September 11, 2026. ### Source excerpt Nitter's repository archived as of September 11, 2026 ## Big AI sets out its terms for regulatory capture and calls it 'Pace the frontier' DevFeed: [Big AI sets out its terms for regulatory capture and calls it 'Pace the frontier']() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Simon Sharwood Published: 2026-09-14T01:15:16Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [www.theregister.com - Articles]() Topics: [Artificial Intelligence](), [ai and ml](), [anthropic](), [OpenAI](), [Microsoft]() Tags: [ai](), [ai-and-ml](), [ai-regulation](), [anthropic](), [dario-amodei](), [elon-musk](), [microsoft](), [openai]() ### AI overview The article examines how major AI figures set out terms for regulatory capture under the label "Pace the frontier." Its supplied summary says Amodei, Altman, Nadella, and Musk agree on how government can address the risks of AI systems they helped create. ### Source excerpt Amodei, Altman, Nadella and Musk agree on how government can tame the monster they created ## Apple and Google Failed to Enforce App Store Policies Against Musk's Abusive Apps DevFeed: [Apple and Google Failed to Enforce App Store Policies Against Musk's Abusive Apps]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Alex Russell Published: 2026-01-20T00:00:00Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Alex Russell]() Topics: [X (Twitter)](), [Mobile](), [Google](), [App]() Tags: [app-store](), [apple](), [browsers](), [business](), [competition](), [elon-musk](), [google](), [mobile](), [phones](), [speech](), [twitter]() ### AI overview An opinion article argues that Apple and Google failed to enforce their App Store policies against abusive Twitter apps, exposing tensions between stated safety principles, antitrust defenses and business interests. ### Source excerpt Twitter's descent into a gutter of the lowest order has been wrenching: Elon Musk's Grok and the Mass Undressing Scandal As I draft this, a week later, it appears pressure from civil society, investigations by regulators, and outright bans on multiple continents have forced Musk to back down to an uncertain degree. As this scandal roiled, Twitter's apps have been continuously available in Google's Play and Apple's App Store, marking new lows in moral cowardice and non-enforcement of the duopolist's own policies. Now we sit on tenterhooks, wondering if the worst has actually passed. What outrage the will the valley's billionaire man-children unleash next? Meanwhile, we brace for this episode to embolden censorious authoritarians keen to suppress a free press and legitimate speech they dislike. This is the backdrop to Elizabeth Lopatto's must-read denunciation in The Verge: It is genuinely unbelievable to me that I wasted hours of my actual life on a court case where Apple explained it needed total control of its App Store to protect its users. Total control of the App Store was Apple's main argument against antitrust enforcement: The company insisted that its monopolistic control of what users could install on their phones was essential to create a walled garden where it could protect children from unsafe content. Ha! Ha ha ha!! -- Elizabeth Lopatto, "Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai are cowards, The Verge" Failure to react to the "everything app" going all-in on abuse of women and girls for weeks reveals the illegitimacy of their mobile monopolies1; anyone pretending otherwise is a fool or a dupe. We don't need to guess why they sat on their hands. Acting against Musk's abusive apps might put Apple and Google out of favour with an erratic, power-tripping administration which in turn could impact short-term business prospects. Their stated principles are incompatible with maximizing shareholder value under competitive authoritarianism. Recall that both firms lent their mono ## No billionaires at FOSDEM DevFeed: [No billionaires at FOSDEM]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: January Published: 2025-01-16T00:00:00Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Drew DeVault]() Topics: [FOSDEM](), [foss](), [Open Source](), [Blockchain](), [Fediverse](), [X (Twitter)]() Tags: [blockchain](), [ceo](), [elon-musk](), [event](), [fosdem](), [foss](), [keynote](), [open-source](), [twitter]() ### AI overview This opinion article argues that FOSDEM should not give its keynote platform to Jack Dorsey. It connects the criticism to Dorsey's former role at Twitter, the impact of Twitter's sale on the fediverse and free software communities, and Block's sponsorship of FOSDEM. The article also notes that Dorsey's talk was later cancelled. ### Source excerpt Update: Dorsey's talk was cancelled! See the update here. Jack Dorsey, former CEO of Twitter, ousted board member of BlueSky, and grifter extraordinaire to the tune of a $5.6B net worth, is giving a keynote at FOSDEM. The FOSDEM keynote stage is one of the biggest platforms in the free software community. Janson is the biggest venue in the event - its huge auditorium can accommodate over 1,500 of FOSDEM's 8,000 odd attendees, and it is live streamed to a worldwide audience as the face of one of the free and open source software community's biggest events of the year. We've platformed Red Hat, the NLNet Foundation, NASA, numerous illustrious community leaders, and many smaller projects that embody our values and spirit at this location to talk about their work or important challenges our community faces. Some of these challenges, as a matter of fact, are Jack Dorsey's fault. In 2023 this stage hosted Hachyderm's Kris Nóva to discuss an exodus of Twitter refugees to the fediverse. After Dorsey sold Twitter to Elon Musk, selling the platform out to the far right for a crisp billion-with-a-"B" dollar payout, the FOSS community shouldered the burden - both with our labor and our wallets - of a massive exodus onto our volunteer-operated servers, especially from victims fleeing the hate speech and harassment left in the wake of the sale. Two years later one of the principal architects of, and beneficiaries of, that disaster will step onto the same stage. Even if our community hadn't been directly harmed by Dorsey's actions, I don't think that we owe this honor to someone who took a billion dollars to ruin their project, ostracize their users, and destroy the livelihoods of almost everyone who worked on it. Dorsey is presumably being platformed in Janson because his blockchain bullshit company is a main sponsor of FOSDEM this year. Dorsey and his colleagues want to get us up to speed on what Block is working on these days. Allow me to give you a preview: in addition to post