# Formal verification Published articles for Formal verification. This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles. ## Join Us: EF Protocol Reddit AMA - September 16th, 2026 DevFeed: [Join Us: EF Protocol Reddit AMA - September 16th, 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ethereum Foundation Protocol Cluster Published: 2026-09-09T00:00:00Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [Ethereum Foundation Blog]() Topics: [Ethereum](), [Development](), [Protocol (disambiguation)](), [Formal verification]() Tags: [2026](), [community](), [development](), [ethereum](), [formal-verification](), [privacy](), [reddit](), [research-development](), [technical](), [upgrades]() ### AI overview The Ethereum Foundation announces a September 16, 2026 Reddit AMA with researchers and developers from its Protocol cluster. The discussion will cover Ethereum protocol development, including the Glamsterdam hard fork, Hegotá, post-quantum Ethereum, formal verification, privacy, client development, and related topics. ### Source excerpt Every year since January 2019, teams from the Ethereum Foundation have spent an afternoon or two on r/ethereum answering questions from the community. The format hasn't really changed: one thread, technical debates, detailed explanations, and community members asking whatever is on their mind. By now it is a tradition, and... ## AWS Launches Graviton5-Based EC2 R9g and R9gd Memory-Optimized Instances DevFeed: [AWS Launches Graviton5-Based EC2 R9g and R9gd Memory-Optimized Instances]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Harold Fritts Published: 2026-09-01T18:42:59Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [StorageReview.com]() Topics: [Amazon Web Services](), [Amazon EC2](), [Arm](), [cpu](), [Hardware](), [Nitro System](), [virtualization](), [Nitro Isolation Engine](), [Database](), [Caching](), [Kubernetes](), [Formal verification]() Tags: [amazon-ec2](), [amazon-eks](), [arm](), [aws](), [c-plus-plus](), [caching](), [cloud](), [database](), [docker](), [enterprise](), [formal-verification](), [go](), [hardware](), [java](), [microservices](), [nitro-isolation-engine](), [nitro-system](), [node-js](), [nvme](), [processors](), [python](), [time]() ### AI overview AWS has generally released the Amazon EC2 R9g and R9gd instances, powered by AWS Graviton5 processors. These Arm-based, memory-optimized instances offer higher per-vCPU performance, faster memory, larger cache capacity, and increased networking and Amazon EBS bandwidth for database, caching, analytics, container, and microservices workloads. R9gd adds local NVMe SSD storage for low-latency local capacity. Both families use the AWS Nitro System and Nitro Isolation Engine, with AWS citing formal verification for the isolation properties. ### Source excerpt AWS has made its Amazon EC2 R9g and R9gd instances generally available, introducing memory-optimized systems powered by AWS Graviton5 processors. The new Arm-based instances target database, caching, analytics, container, and microservices workloads that require high memory bandwidth and improved per-vCPU performance. Compared with Graviton4-based R8g instances, AWS states that R9g can deliver up to 25% The post AWS Launches Graviton5-Based EC2 R9g and R9gd Memory-Optimized Instances appeared first on StorageReview.com. ## Developing provably correct Rust code with Verus DevFeed: [Developing provably correct Rust code with Verus]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Bryan Parno Published: 2026-08-31T15:35:33Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Amazon Science homepage]() Topics: [Rust formal verification](), [Vulnerabilities]() Tags: [amazon-elastic-compute](), [automated-reasoning](), [aws-lambda](), [code](), [firecracker](), [formal-methods](), [formal-verification](), [open-source](), [rust](), [security](), [testing]() ### AI overview The article explains how Verus formally verifies Rust code against mathematical specifications, helping establish correctness beyond what Rust safety checks and conventional tests provide. ### Source excerpt How the Verus "program verifier", which automatically checks code against a mathematical specification of its functionality, helps increase security assurance in software projects. ## Raising machine-checked security benchmarks to advance hash-based SNARKs through agentic collaboration DevFeed: [Raising machine-checked security benchmarks to advance hash-based SNARKs through agentic collaboration]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ethereum Foundation Formal Verification team Published: 2026-08-20T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Ethereum Foundation Blog]() Topics: [Formal verification](), [Lean](), [Ethereum](), [AI research agents](), [AI Models](), [Library](), [Security]() Tags: [agentic](), [ai-agents](), [collaboration](), [ethereum](), [formal-verification](), [leaderboard](), [paper](), [research](), [research-development](), [security](), [verification]() ### AI overview The Ethereum Foundation's Formal Verification team launched better.codes, an open autoresearch challenge focused on raising the machine-checked soundness bound of the Lean-formalized koalaIRS12 Reed-Solomon proximity problem toward a fixed 128-bit target. Submissions are checked by the Lean kernel and promoted proofs are shared publicly. ### Source excerpt better.codes, an open autoresearch challenge built by the Ethereum Foundation Formal Verification team in collaboration with Yukon and zkSecurity, is now live. better.codes takes a self-contained problem from the Proximity Prize research, formalized in Lean, and puts its soundness bound on a public leaderboard that anyone can push forward.... ## Securing the agentic era: Introducing formal verification for CEL DevFeed: [Securing the agentic era: Introducing formal verification for CEL]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Google Open Source (noreply@blogger.com) Published: 2026-08-18T18:30:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Google Open Source Blog]() Topics: [Formal verification](), [Automated reasoning](), [Testing](), [Artificial Intelligence]() Tags: [agent](), [ai](), [ai-agent](), [automated-reasoning](), [cel](), [common-expression-language](), [formal-verification](), [open-source](), [security](), [testing](), [verification](), [z3]() ### AI overview Google's Common Expression Language (CEL) Formal Verification Framework is available for proving the correctness of CEL expressions and policies. Powered by the Z3 theorem prover, it complements heuristic testing by using mathematical proofs to identify logic flaws, equivalence issues, and potentially unsafe policy behavior. ### Source excerpt by Sean Huh, Common Expression Language Team We are rapidly entering an era where AI agents can autonomously draft, refactor, and deploy policies that protect our users and our systems. But this velocity introduces a vital question: How do we trust AI-generated policies? Unit tests may fail to cover the infinite set of possible inputs that occur in production; thus, an AI agent that overfits its policy to existing tests may fail spectacularly in production. To secure automated policy authoring, we must combine heuristic testing with mathematical proofs. We are thrilled to announce the Common Expression Language (CEL) Formal Verification Framework is now available. Powered by the Z3 theorem prover, this framework allows you to prove the correctness of your CEL expressions and policies, serving as the ultimate safety net for the agentic policy. Automated reasoning definitively answers questions like: "Is there any combination of inputs that allows an unapproved request into production?" "Are we absolutely certain this AI-refactored policy matches the original behavior?" "Can a bad actor manipulate this rule to force an evaluation error?" Formal verification establishes mathematical certainty across the infinite spectrum of inputs. Proven policies protect your users and system while giving auditors clear proof of compliance. To see these capabilities in action, watch our video demonstrating how the CEL Verifier REPL catches subtle logic flaws in seconds: Proving rules from the ground up Getting started with formal verification doesn't require learning complex architectures right away. You can evaluate simple standalone CEL expressions to catch edge cases that tests easily miss. (Note: The examples below use our interactive REPL syntax--check out the REPL documentation to follow along!) 1. Catching logic bugs in simple expressions (Equivalence) How do you guarantee a refactored rule behaves identically to the original? Suppose we have a policy that allows ports 80 or 443 ## Allocation Update - Q2 2026 DevFeed: [Allocation Update - Q2 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ethereum Foundation Ecosystem Support Program Published: 2026-08-18T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Ethereum Foundation Blog]() Topics: [Ethereum](), [Resilience](), [zero-knowledge](), [client](), [Formal verification](), [Open Source](), [Tooling]() Tags: [2026](), [ecosystem-support-program](), [ethereum](), [formal-verification](), [network](), [open-source](), [resilience](), [tooling](), [update](), [zero-knowledge]() ### AI overview An update on Ethereum's Q2 2026 allocation efforts, covering support for zero-knowledge proofs, client diversity, formal verification, open-source tooling, and other ecosystem projects intended to strengthen the network. ### Source excerpt Q2 2026 carried forward our focus on advancing Ethereum's resilience and capabilities, supporting key work in zero-knowledge proofs, client diversity, formal verification, and open-source tooling. See the list below of the projects and ecosystem efforts supported this quarter as builders build and strengthen the network. Explore the full list... ## A decade of mathematical certainty: Reflections on the Automated Reasoning Group DevFeed: [A decade of mathematical certainty: Reflections on the Automated Reasoning Group]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Byron Cook Published: 2026-08-11T16:22:19Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Amazon Science homepage]() Topics: [Automated reasoning](), [Formal verification](), [Math and Logic](), [systems](), [Amazon Web Services](), [VPC](), [network security](), [Security](), [AWS IAM](), [Amazon S3](), [Cloud](), [amazon]() Tags: [agentic-ai](), [amazon](), [amazon-web-services-aws](), [automated-reasoning](), [aws](), [compliance](), [formal-verification](), [network-security](), [security](), [security-privacy-and-abuse-prevention](), [vpc](), [vulnerabilities]() ### AI overview Amazon's Automated Reasoning Group reflects on a decade of applying mathematical logic, formal verification, and program analysis to AWS security and reliability. The article describes how research projects became production systems, including Tiros for VPC and network analysis and Zelkova for analyzing policies, S3 Block Public Access, and IAM Access Analyzer. ### Source excerpt Ten years after we founded the Automated Reasoning Group, mathematical logic has moved from academic research into production services that secure millions of customer workloads -- demonstrating that systems can be provably correct, not just probably correct. ## Leonardo de Moura on Lean, Formal Verification, and the Future of Mathematics DevFeed: [Leonardo de Moura on Lean, Formal Verification, and the Future of Mathematics]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ryan Peterman Published: 2026-08-10T13:03:04Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [The Developing Dev]() Topics: [Lean](), [Formal verification](), [math](), [Large Language Model]() Tags: [code](), [formal-verification](), [google](), [language](), [llms](), [math](), [podcasts](), [programming](), [programming-language](), [software](), [verification]() ### AI overview An interview with Leonardo de Moura, creator of Lean, about using the programming language for machine-checkable proofs, software verification, and mathematical reasoning. The discussion also covers how LLMs can work with Lean to generate and verify proofs. ### Source excerpt In 2024, AlphaProof from Google Deepmind broke through in competition math achieving a silver-medal in Interational Mathematical Olympiad (IMO). ## Formal methods with Hillel Wayne DevFeed: [Formal methods with Hillel Wayne]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Gergely Orosz Published: 2026-07-29T16:22:31Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [The Pragmatic Engineer]() Topics: [Formal methods](), [Formal verification](), [Software Engineering](), [distributed-systems](), [Artificial Intelligence]() Tags: [ai](), [distributed-systems](), [formal-methods](), [formal-verification](), [software-engineering](), [version-control]() ### AI overview Hillel Wayne discusses why formal methods such as TLA+ matter for reliable software, how formal verification tools fit into software development, why distributed systems are difficult to reason about, and whether AI could make these methods more accessible. ### Source excerpt Hillel Wayne explains why formal methods like TLA+ matter, how they help build reliable software, and whether AI will finally bring formal verification into the mainstream. ## Amazon is investing in the Lean Focused Research Organization DevFeed: [Amazon is investing in the Lean Focused Research Organization]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Byron Cook; Shawn Bice Published: 2026-07-26T08:00:00Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [Amazon Science homepage]() Topics: [AI Bots](), [AI Chat]() Tags: [agents](), [ai-agents](), [amazon](), [amazon-aurora](), [amazon-bedrock](), [amazon-bedrock-agentcore](), [amazon-web-services-aws](), [automated-reasoning](), [aws](), [developer](), [formal-verification](), [generative-ai](), [large-language-models-llms](), [llm](), [programming](), [programming-language](), [research](), [responsible-ai](), [safety](), [software-testing](), [testing](), [trustworthy-ai]() ### AI overview Amazon is making a long-term investment in the Lean Focused Research Organization to advance Lean, a programming language for mathematical correctness proofs. The article highlights Lean-based verification for safer AI agents and AWS systems. ### Source excerpt As AI agents take on higher-stakes decisions, Lean programming language makes it possible to mathematically prove they will behave safely. ## Creator of OCaml: Functional Programming, Formal Verification, Programming Languages | Xavier Leroy DevFeed: [Creator of OCaml: Functional Programming, Formal Verification, Programming Languages | Xavier Leroy]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ryan Peterman Published: 2026-07-20T13:05:11Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [The Developing Dev]() Topics: [OCaml](), [Functional programming](), [Programming](), [Formal verification](), [Programming language]() Tags: [formal-verification](), [functional](), [functional-programming](), [ocaml](), [programming](), [programming-language](), [verification]() ### AI overview A podcast transcript featuring Xavier Leroy discusses what distinguishes OCaml, including its functional and systems programming capabilities, type inference, control structures, predictable execution costs, and low-latency garbage collection. The conversation also covers formal verification through the CompCert project and comparisons with languages such as Rust and JavaScript. ### Source excerpt Professor Leroy (Creator of OCaml) is incredibly knowledgeable. ## Verifying Rust cryptography in SymCrypt, from standards to code DevFeed: [Verifying Rust cryptography in SymCrypt, from standards to code]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Son Ho, Cédric Fournet, Antoine Delignat-Lavaud, Samuel Lee, Jason Fisher, Jessica Krynitsky Published: 2026-07-13T16:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Microsoft Research]() Topics: [Rust](), [Rust formal verification](), [Cryptography](), [Formal verification](), [Post-quantum cryptography](), [Lean](), [toolchain](), [Microsoft]() Tags: [cryptography](), [formal-verification](), [memory-safety](), [microsoft](), [post-quantum](), [research](), [research-blog](), [rust](), [security]() ### AI overview Microsoft Research describes how SymCrypt uses safe Rust, Lean, and the Aeneas toolchain to formally verify production cryptographic implementations. The approach combines Rust's memory-safety guarantees with machine-checked proofs of functional correctness, with initial verified code for SHA-3 and ML-KEM and support from independently verifiable proof-writing agents. ### Source excerpt Cryptographic code supports vital protections in modern computing systems. Learn how a new method helps verify code as developers write it while preserving speed and adaptability as it gets implemented and evolves. The post Verifying Rust cryptography in SymCrypt, from standards to code appeared first on Microsoft Research. ## The final boss of reliability: formal verification DevFeed: [The final boss of reliability: formal verification]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Glauber Costa Published: 2026-07-07T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Turso Blog]() Topics: [Formal methods](), [Turso](), [SQLite](), [Databases](), [debugging]() Tags: [article](), [bug](), [bugs](), [debugging](), [engineering](), [formal-methods](), [formal-verification](), [sqlite](), [testing](), [turso]() ### AI overview The article explains how Turso is partnering with Aretta AI to add formal verification to its reliability and testing practices. It discusses Turso's SQLite compatibility, deterministic simulation testing, Antithesis, and the cost of finding bugs late in the process. ### Source excerpt How we are partnering with Aretta AI to bring formal verification into Turso's testing arsenal, and the fsync bug it already caught. ## Leanstral 1.5: Proof Abundance for All DevFeed: [Leanstral 1.5: Proof Abundance for All]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2026-07-02T13:55:54Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Mistral AI Blog]() Topics: [Lean](), [Formal methods](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Open Source](), [hugging face](), [API](), [Code]() Tags: [apache](), [api](), [code](), [developer](), [formal-methods](), [formal-verification](), [hugging-face](), [launch](), [models](), [open-source](), [reinforcement-learning](), [training]() ### AI overview Mistral releases Leanstral 1.5, an Apache-2.0 licensed model for formal verification in Lean 4. The 6B-active-parameter model reports strong miniF2F, PutnamBench, FATE-H, and FATE-X results, and identifies previously unknown bugs in open-source repositories. ### Source excerpt The most powerful AI platform for enterprises. Customize, fine-tune, and deploy AI assistants, autonomous agents, and multimodal AI with open models. ## EC2's formally verified "isolation engine" provides mathematical assurance of virtual-machine isolation DevFeed: [EC2's formally verified "isolation engine" provides mathematical assurance of virtual-machine isolation]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Dominic Mulligan; Nathan Chong Published: 2026-06-10T15:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Amazon Science homepage]() Topics: [Amazon EC2](), [Rust formal verification]() Tags: [amazon-web-services-aws](), [autocorrode-library](), [automated-reasoning](), [aws-graviton5-security](), [cloud-and-systems](), [confidentiality-integrity-proofs](), [ec2-virtual-machine-security](), [formal-verification](), [formally-verified-hypervisor](), [isabelle-hol-proof-assistant](), [kernel](), [memory-safety-verification](), [nitro-isolation-engine](), [nitro-system](), [provable-security](), [rust](), [rust-formal-verification](), [security](), [security-privacy-and-abuse-prevention]() ### AI overview Amazon describes formally verifying the Nitro Isolation Engine, a separation-kernel component that enforces isolation between EC2 virtual machines. The verification uses Isabelle/HOL and is deployed as an always-on feature for Graviton5 users. ### Source excerpt Splitting the "separation kernel" off from the rest of the Nitro security system and using only a subset of the Rust programming language to code it enabled its formal verification. ## Graviton5's improved design increases speed and energy efficiency -- beyond Moore's law DevFeed: [Graviton5's improved design increases speed and energy efficiency -- beyond Moore's law]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ali Saidi Published: 2026-06-10T15:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Amazon Science homepage]() Topics: [cpu](), [Amazon EC2]() Tags: [amazon-elastic-compute](), [architecture](), [cache](), [chip-design](), [cloud-and-systems](), [cpu](), [design](), [energy-efficiency](), [formal-verification](), [graviton](), [hardware](), [memory](), [performance](), [speed]() ### AI overview Amazon describes Graviton5 CPU and M9g/M9gd EC2 instances, highlighting more cores, faster memory and interconnects, improved branch prediction, and expanded cache capacity. ### Source excerpt A new chiplet architecture, custom die-to-die connectivity, and support for DDR5-8800 memory and the latest PCIe gen6 interconnects improve performance by 25% for general-purpose and agentic AI workloads. ## Who Verifies the Verifier DevFeed: [Who Verifies the Verifier]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2026-05-28T00:00:00Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Alex Korbonits]() Topics: [Artificial Intelligence](), [Formal verification](), [Compiler](), [Lean](), [Math and Logic](), [Google](), [Inference](), [Language models]() Tags: [ai](), [compiler](), [formal-verification](), [google](), [inference](), [model](), [paper](), [research]() ### AI overview The article examines whether formal verification can make AI-generated mathematical proofs scalable. It contrasts human review of natural-language proofs with Google DeepMind's approach of generating proofs directly in Lean and using the Lean compiler to verify them, while noting that the system's ability to read existing mathematics remains limited. ### Source excerpt An AI built the machine I said mathematics needed -- a compiler that verifies proofs for cents instead of expert weekends. The catch is what it still can't read. ## How we used Quint to find over 10 bugs in SQLite while hardening Turso DevFeed: [How we used Quint to find over 10 bugs in SQLite while hardening Turso]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Glauber Costa Published: 2026-05-18T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Turso Blog]() Topics: [Turso](), [SQLite](), [Formal methods](), [Formal verification](), [API](), [SDKs](), [Test coverage]() Tags: [api](), [article](), [c](), [community](), [engineering](), [formal-methods](), [formal-verification](), [how-to](), [open-source](), [sqlite](), [testing](), [turso]() ### AI overview This article describes how a Turso community member modeled the SQLite C API in Quint, generated execution traces, and ran them against real SQLite to uncover more than 10 bugs. It presents the approach as an effort to strengthen Turso's testing and explore more accessible formal methods. ### Source excerpt A Turso community member modeled the SQLite C API in Quint, ran the generated traces against real SQLite, and uncovered more than 10 bugs along the way. ## Using LLMs with SMT Solvers for Automated Reasoning and Formal Verification DevFeed: [Using LLMs with SMT Solvers for Automated Reasoning and Formal Verification]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2026-04-02T00:00:00Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Alex Korbonits]() Topics: [Automated reasoning](), [Large Language Model](), [Formal verification](), [Prompt Engineering](), [Claude](), [graph theory](), [Machine learning](), [Artificial Intelligence]() Tags: [automated-reasoning](), [claude](), [formal-verification](), [graph-theory](), [llm](), [prompt-engineering]() ### AI overview The author revisits a November 2023 idea about using Claude and prompt engineering to translate problems into propositions for an SMT solver, satisfy proofs, eliminate unknowns and quantifiers, and return results to an agent. The essay connects this idea to the author's background in formal logic, graph theory and machine learning, while noting that the concept was not novel in isolation. ### Source excerpt A November 2023 notebook entry about grounding LLMs with SMT solvers -- why formal verification might be the right fix for hallucination, and what it took to finally say it out loud. ## Shipping an L1 zkEVM #1: Realtime Proving DevFeed: [Shipping an L1 zkEVM #1: Realtime Proving]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Sophia Gold Published: 2025-07-10T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Ethereum Foundation Blog]() Topics: [Ethereum](), [realtime](), [Formal verification]() Tags: [ethereum](), [formal-verification](), [realtime](), [research-development](), [security]() ### AI overview Ethereum proposes a phased path toward an L1 zkEVM in which validators can verify multiple zkVM-generated execution proofs instead of re-executing execution payloads. The proposal defines realtime-proving targets for zkVM teams and anticipates gradual validator adoption as production security is demonstrated. ### Source excerpt Thanks to Kevaundray Wedderburn, Alex Stokes, Tim Beiko, Mary Maller, Alexander Hicks, George Kadianakis, Dankrad Feist, and Justin Drake for feedback and review. Ethereum is going all in on ZK. Eventually we expect to migrate to using ZK proofs at all levels of the stack, from consensus layer signature... ## Audit Results for the Pectra System Contracts DevFeed: [Audit Results for the Pectra System Contracts]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Protocol Security Research Team Published: 2025-02-28T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Ethereum Foundation Blog]() Topics: [Ethereum](), [Security](), [Formal verification]() Tags: [bug-bounty](), [bytecode](), [ethereum](), [formal-verification](), [reports](), [review](), [security]() ### AI overview The article reports on external security reviews and formal verification of the Ethereum Pectra System Contracts. It states that all relevant or important issues identified in the reviews were addressed, while noting that the verification assessed bytecode correctness against the specifications rather than the security of the specifications themselves. A Pectra bug bounty competition is also running with rewards of up to $2,000,000. ### Source excerpt The security of the Ethereum protocol is continually being improved, and one recent effort is the external security review of the Pectra System Contracts. The results of this review can be found in the audits repository, and the TL;DR is that all discovered issues deemed relevant or important from... ## Introducing the 2025 Academic Grants Round DevFeed: [Introducing the 2025 Academic Grants Round]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Shyam Sridhar Published: 2025-01-21T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Ethereum Foundation Blog]() Topics: [Ethereum](), [Algorithms](), [Cryptography](), [Formal verification](), [networking](), [P2P](), [Security]() Tags: [2025](), [academic-research](), [algorithms](), [announce](), [cryptography](), [ethereum](), [formal-verification](), [funding](), [funding-coordination](), [networking](), [p2p](), [pdf](), [security]() ### AI overview The Ethereum Foundation's Ecosystem Funding Initiative has opened its 2025 Academic Grants Round, offering $2 million for open-access academic research related to Ethereum. Proposals are due by March 16, 2025. ### Source excerpt The EF's Ecosystem Funding Initiative team is proud to announce the launch of the 2025 Academic Grants Round, a pioneering initiative aimed at empowering and expanding the frontiers of Ethereum-related academic research. With a dedicated fund of $2 million, we are eager to build upon the success of the previous... ## Looking for Missed Alarm Bugs in a Formal Verification Tool DevFeed: [Looking for Missed Alarm Bugs in a Formal Verification Tool]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: regehr Published: 2024-09-04T18:29:03Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Embedded in Academia]() Topics: [Formal verification](), [LLVM](), [Compiler](), [Testing](), [C](), [C++](), [undefined\_behavior]() Tags: [bugs](), [c](), [c-plus-plus](), [compiler](), [formal-verification](), [llvm](), [testing](), [uncategorized](), [undefined-behavior](), [verification]() ### AI overview This co-authored article explains how formal verification tools themselves require rigorous engineering and testing. It describes testing Alive2, a translation validation tool for LLVM optimizations, including the challenge of finding missed-alarm bugs and the use of randomized program generation with YARPGen. ### Source excerpt [This piece is co-authored with Vsevolod Livinskii.] Formal verification isn't some sort of magic pixie dust that we sprinkle over a computer system to make it better. Real formal verification involves a lot of the same kind of difficult, nasty, grungy engineering work that any other systems-level job involves. Furthermore, the verification tools themselves are [...] ## Finalized No. 25: Rayonism, blst Security Advisory, and Beacon Chain Security RfP DevFeed: [Finalized No. 25: Rayonism, blst Security Advisory, and Beacon Chain Security RfP]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Danny Ryan Published: 2021-04-02T00:00:00Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [Ethereum Foundation Blog]() Topics: [Security](), [Development](), [Fuzzing/Fuzz testing](), [Testing](), [migration](), [Formal verification]() Tags: [discord](), [formal-verification](), [fuzzing](), [migration](), [pos](), [pow](), [research-development](), [security](), [testing]() ### AI overview This Ethereum Foundation update covers Rayonism Merge devnets, a patched security issue in the blst BLS library, and a request for proposals on Beacon Chain security and testing. ### Source excerpt tl;dr Rayonism☀, hacking the Merge together blst security advisory Reminder! Beacon Chain security+testing RfP... [Next page]()