# macbook pro Published articles for macbook pro. This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles. ## Everything you need to know about the new MacBook Pro's OLED display DevFeed: [Everything you need to know about the new MacBook Pro's OLED display]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Jonny Evans Published: 2026-11-06T10:10:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Computerworld]() Topics: [color](), [screen brightness](), [User interface design]() Tags: [apple](), [apple-computers-and-peripherals-mac-vendors-and-providers](), [colors](), [computers-and-peripherals](), [display](), [edition-us](), [film](), [fingerprint](), [glass](), [industry](), [interface](), [language-en](), [laptop](), [layer](), [layers](), [mac](), [macbook](), [macbook-pro](), [oled](), [oled-display](), [panel](), [performance](), [product](), [quality](), [reference](), [storytype-opinion](), [vendors-and-providers]() ### AI overview The MacBook Pro's PROLED XDR combines a thin, 50-layer tandem OLED panel with touch sensors built into the display. The excerpt reports brightness up to 2,000 nits, a 10,000,000:1 contrast ratio, adaptive 10-120Hz refresh, and pixel-level color and luminance control; nanotexture is etched into the cover glass. Touch is described as having zero latency, with a redesigned hinge to reduce wobble. macOS translates touch into clicks and enlarges menus automatically, so most apps need little or no adjustment; developers can use new gesture APIs for deeper support. The author reports touch features in Pixelmator Pro, Logic Pro, and Xcode, and says Apple's AI video stabilization helps reduce shake during calls. The author's comparison with other touch OLED laptops favors this display on peak brightness, shadow and highlight detail, off-angle color shift, and screen stability, though the excerpt provides no measurement method. ### Source excerpt Apple's recently introduced MacBook Pro with PROLED XDR introduces a tandem OLED display and, for the first time, a touch interface. I discussed the approach Apple took to designing its new pro laptop with Apple's Vice President of Mac and iPad Product Marketing, Tom Boger, which you can read here. What follows is a little more information on some of the product features people are asking about, along with my first impressions of interacting with the display. How the panel is made The PROLED XDR display is made of 50 layers that total less than one millimeter. It's a single sheet of glass carrying more than 100 million thin film transistors, arranged in 15 layers under 10 microns thick. The tandem OLED layers sit on top of this: two stacks making up 30 layers, each between a few nanometers and a few hundred nanometers thick. Apple wanted to make the display as thin as possible, because a thin display delivers much better performance and the company wanted to optimize the OLED technology. Apple took great pains in building this; it even worked with its display supplier to simulate how OLED molecules evaporate onto the glass and to track each layer's thickness as it comes off the line. It was interesting to learn that the panels are made on giant sheets of "mother glass," with about eighty 14-inch panels per sheet. The final layers add mechanical, electrical and thermal benefits, with optical adhesive and a cover glass with anti-reflective and fingerprint-resistant coatings placed on top. One industry observer I spoke with remarked that these high-end display fabrication factories are massive, the size of football stadiums, with the most extreme needs for clean-room suits and high-tech protection. What this means for the display The up to 2,000 nits display delivers stunning clarity with a 10,000,000:1 contrast ratio. It supports P3, Adobe RGB, DICOM and more, and shows colors at reference quality, something once reserved for monitors costing around $30,000. (Anyone w ## Apple VP Tom Boger on MacBook Pro weight, design, and the return of the glowing logo DevFeed: [Apple VP Tom Boger on MacBook Pro weight, design, and the return of the glowing logo]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Jonny Evans Published: 2026-11-05T10:30:00Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [Computerworld]() Topics: [User interface design](), [human computer interaction](), [ipad]() Tags: [apple](), [apple-artificial-intelligence-computers-computers-and-peripherals-laptops-mac-macbook-vendors](), [artificial-intelligence](), [computers-and-peripherals](), [design](), [display](), [edition-us](), [language-en](), [logo](), [mac](), [macbook-pro](), [productivity](), [storytype-interview](), [vendors-and-providers](), [weight]() ### AI overview Apple VP Tom Boger says the MacBook Pro's lower weight came from many small component changes designed to preserve each part's function: about half a pound for the 14-inch model and 0.7 pounds for the 16-inch. The article describes a tandem OLED display with a stated 10,000,000:1 contrast ratio and brightness up to 2,000 nits, alongside touch input intended to complement rather than replace keyboard and trackpad use. Boger also highlights the return of a reflective illuminated Apple logo, whose implementation he leaves unexplained. For enterprises, he argues Macs can reduce support costs and that Apple Silicon's unified memory can make local AI model use less costly than cloud token-based use; these are his claims, not independently established comparisons here. The article frames touch as a way to extend creative workflows and gives a starting price of $2,899. ### Source excerpt Almost everyone in tech already knows about Apple's new MacBook Pro with PROLED XDR Display, a light, bright, thin pro Mac notebook with a reference-grade touch responsive display, adding a touch of iPad to the Mac. It's already being talked about as the future, at least of the company's pro laptops. I spoke with Apple's Vice President of Mac and iPad Product Marketing, Tom Boger, to find out more. The specs of the new MacBook Pro are written about everywhere -- including here -- so I wanted to get a feel for how Apple thought about building the system. We looked at the weight the team took out, the restraint behind its design choices, the illuminated logo it brought back, and why the Mac makes so much sense for the enterprise. Weight: a thousand small decisions The first thing people notice about the new MacBook Pro, Boger said, is how much lighter it has become. The 14-inch model is about half a pound lighter, and the 16-inch about 0.7 pounds lighter. This weight loss was not easy to achieve. The team looked at every single component used in the Mac to find opportunities to reduce its weight, Boger said. "It's not one thing here, one thing there. It's a thousand things." The challenge is to reduce the weight of individual components while leaving each part as functional as it was. "You have to make sure you're not compromising the integrity of whatever component you're taking the weight out of." I pictured engineers shaving away microns, milligrams, and grams from all the components used. "That's literally what it takes," Boger said. Of all the things Apple did with this product, he said, this was probably the one where "you really have to sweat every little detail." Design: raise the bar, don't change the Mac The display is the headline feature of this MacBook Pro, Boger said. It did not appear overnight. Apple's display engineering team is "one of, if not the best in the world," he said. Building a panel like this "takes years of development." The technology is on ## Claude Code with Opus 5.5 fully edited my vlog from a single prompt DevFeed: [Claude Code with Opus 5.5 fully edited my vlog from a single prompt]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Pieter Levels Published: 2026-11-01T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [@levelsio (Pieter Levels)]() Topics: [Claude Code](), [Claude](), [X (Twitter)]() Tags: [ai](), [apple](), [claude](), [claude-code](), [dji](), [gpu](), [grid](), [image](), [json](), [macbook-pro](), [matching](), [mlx](), [model](), [opencv](), [opus-5-5](), [process](), [prompt](), [python](), [vibe-coding](), [video](), [vlog](), [youtube]() ### AI overview The creator says Claude Code with Opus 5.5 assembled a roughly 10-minute vlog from a single request, with only a few later adjustments. The workflow transcribed speech using mlx-whisper (Whisper large-v3-turbo on the MacBook Pro GPU via Apple MLX), generated contact sheets from video frames for visual review, used SpeechBrain ECAPA to identify the creator's voice, and made face-detection thumbnails with OpenCV and YuNet. Claude selected clip segments based on transcripts and frame grids, recording cuts as clip names and start/end times in JSON. The creator added captions for X and YouTube's first minute using Pillow. They say AI editing makes vlogging practical for them by reducing the time and hassle of editing or hiring help. ### Source excerpt My vlog today was fully edited by Claude Code with Opus 5.5! I copied the video clips from my DJI to a folder, then opened Claude Code in it and asked it to ed... ## M6 MacBook Pro vs M5 MacBook Air: What Does the Extra $900 Buy? DevFeed: [M6 MacBook Pro vs M5 MacBook Air: What Does the Extra $900 Buy?]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: TechRepublic Staff Published: 2026-10-30T09:26:51Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [TechRepublic]() Topics: [upgrade](), [On-device AI](), [screen brightness](), [color]() Tags: [ai](), [air](), [apple](), [apple-m5](), [apple-m6](), [apple-silicon](), [applications](), [business](), [business-laptops](), [buyers-guides](), [camera](), [color](), [compare](), [comparisons](), [compatibility](), [configuration](), [connectivity](), [costs](), [display](), [hardware](), [laptop-comparison](), [m6](), [macbook](), [macbook-air](), [macbook-pro](), [news](), [pcs-and-peripherals](), [performance](), [storage]() ### AI overview The 14-inch M6 MacBook Pro starts at $1,999, $900 above the 13-inch M5 MacBook Air. The premium buys a 12-core CPU and GPU versus the Air's 10-core CPU and 8-core base GPU, twice the starting storage, a brighter 1,600-nit peak HDR display with a higher refresh rate, and HDMI, SDXC, and a third Thunderbolt 4 port. Those features may suit HDR editors, camera-file workflows, and some demanding development or local AI tasks; the lighter, fanless Air is presented as sufficient for documents, web apps, and video calls. Both start with 16GB memory, upgrade to 32GB, support Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, and up to two external displays. Apple's stated M6 speed gains compare it with the previous base M5 Pro, not the M5 Air, so they do not establish the Pro's performance advantage over the Air. The article recommends configuration-matched testing for sustained workloads. ### Source excerpt The M6 MacBook Pro costs $900 more than the M5 MacBook Air. Compare the display, ports, storage, and performance claims before choosing. The post M6 MacBook Pro vs M5 MacBook Air: What Does the Extra $900 Buy? appeared first on TechRepublic. ## Apple brings touch to the Mac with $2,899 OLED MacBook Pro DevFeed: [Apple brings touch to the Mac with $2,899 OLED MacBook Pro]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Jonny Evans Published: 2026-10-29T12:39:20Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Computerworld]() Topics: [human computer interaction](), [User interface design](), [macOS](), [screen brightness](), [color]() Tags: [apple](), [apple-computers-and-peripherals-mac-macos](), [battery](), [battery-life](), [charging](), [chips](), [computers-and-peripherals](), [configuration](), [design](), [display](), [edition-us](), [educators](), [enterprises](), [fast-charging](), [handwriting](), [hdr](), [idc](), [interface](), [language-en](), [laptop](), [mac](), [macbook](), [macbook-pro](), [macos](), [oled](), [productivity](), [storytype-newsanalysis]() ### AI overview Apple's touch MacBook Pro adds touch controls to the existing macOS interface, alongside keyboard and trackpad use. The article says macOS 27 translates many on-screen actions for existing apps, while developer APIs will enable deeper touch support; Microsoft Office apps, Lightroom, DaVinci Resolve, Blender, and Cinema 4D are expected to gain it later this year. Apple cites creative work such as drawing and fine control as potential uses. The 14- and 16-inch models use M5 Pro or M5 Max chips and tandem OLED displays, with up to 128GB unified memory, 16TB storage, 2,000-nit peak brightness, and 10-120Hz refresh. Apple claims up to 24 hours of battery life, though the 14-inch model is rated at 22 hours and actual life varies by use and configuration. Prices start at $2,899; availability is stated as November 6. ### Source excerpt Following the release of the new 14-inch M6 MacBook Pro earlier this week, Apple has bought the "touch experience" to its professional laptop series, introducing a $2,899 (and up) MacBook Pro you can use with touch. It's very fast, very thin, very light, with an impressive PROLED XDR display and up to 24 hours battery life. A brief tour through the key specs Very fast: Available in 14- and 16-inch models, the new MacBook Pro uses Apple's powerful M5 Pro and M5 Max chips. They support up to 64GB of unified memory (128GB on M5 Max) and up to 16TB of storage. Apple says the M5 Max can run LLMs with hundreds of billions of parameters entirely on-device. Very thin: The 14-inch model is 0.59 inch (1.50 cm) thick, while the 16-inch is 0.63 inch (1.60 cm), so these are only a little thicker than a MacBook Air. Apple says the thinner design is a benefit of the move to an OLED display. Very light: The 14-inch weighs 3 pounds, half a pound less than the non-touch equivalent MacBook Pro. The 16-inch weighs 4 pounds, which is 0.7 pounds lighter. Industry-leading PROLED XDR display: A tandem OLED panel with up to 2,000 nits peak brightness (1,000 nits sustained brightness) for both HDR and SDR, and a 10,000,000:1 contrast ratio. Refresh rate is variable from 10Hz up to 120Hz. Up to 24 hours of battery life: Apple says this is the maximum and that battery life varies by use and configuration. It also varies by model -- the 14-inch yields "just" 22 hours battery life. Fast charging takes the battery to 50% in 30 minutes. Unpacking those numbers, it's crystal-clear Apple has not stinted on the performance of this pro Mac, with a price tag to match. IDC data shows that 66% of all touch notebooks are purchased by enterprises. This is a form factor bought for flexibility for field workers, educators, and professionals who move between typing, tapping, and handwriting. Touch on a Mac Which brings me to the "touch experience." Apple hasn't replaced the traditional Mac interface with touch ## Block Unveils Dessa, a Full-Duplex Speech Model Trained Only on Speech DevFeed: [Block Unveils Dessa, a Full-Duplex Speech Model Trained Only on Speech]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Michal Sutter Published: 2026-10-29T07:50:39Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [MarkTechPost]() Topics: [Speech Processing](), [AI Models](), [Local AI](), [Inference](), [Large Language Model](), [asr]() Tags: [agents](), [ai](), [ai-research](), [api](), [architecture](), [artificial-intelligence](), [audio](), [audio-language-model](), [benchmark](), [benchmarks](), [blackwell](), [block](), [compute](), [cpus](), [dessa](), [editors-pick](), [full-duplex-speech-model](), [lab](), [language-model](), [macbook](), [macbook-pro](), [model](), [speech](), [speech-to-speech](), [staff](), [technology](), [voice-ai]() ### AI overview Block's research preview Dessa is a full-duplex speech-to-speech model trained only on human conversation audio, with no text or pretrained models, according to the lab. It listens while speaking and is shown in demos using backchannels, interruptions, laughter, and changes in volume. Block says it runs locally faster than real time on a MacBook Pro M4 Max or better and was trained on one NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 rack. The excerpt contrasts this with Moshi's text-model backbone, time-aligned text and audio tokens, and reported use of 1,016 H100 GPUs. Block has not published Dessa's architecture, benchmark scores, parameter count, weights, API, or price; access is described as waitlist-only. ### Source excerpt Block's AI lab released Dessa, a full-duplex speech-to-speech model trained only on human conversation audio. It runs locally on a MacBook Pro M4 Max, but Block has published no size, benchmarks or weights. The post Block Unveils Dessa, a Full-Duplex Speech Model Trained Only on Speech appeared first on MarkTechPost. ## Apple revived the glowing logo, and turned it into the ultimate status symbol DevFeed: [Apple revived the glowing logo, and turned it into the ultimate status symbol]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Sarang Sheth Published: 2026-10-28T22:30:51Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Yanko Design]() Topics: [macOS](), [User interface design](), [screen brightness]() Tags: [2015](), [2022](), [aluminum](), [apple](), [bmw](), [cafe](), [design](), [display](), [editorial](), [editorial-laptops-apple-macbook-pro](), [exclusive](), [glow](), [hollywood](), [iphone](), [ipod](), [jobs](), [laptop](), [laptops](), [lcd](), [light](), [logo](), [macbook-pro](), [status]() ### AI overview Apple's revived glowing MacBook logo is an exclusive feature on MacBook Pro models starting at $2,899, while the standard and $1,999 M6 models retain unlit mirror logos. The old logo used light from the LCD backlight; OLED pixels produce their own light, so the new design needs a separate light source. A 2022 patent for a backlit, partially reflective mirror may explain the approach, but Apple has not confirmed it. The article frames the glow as a paid status signal, comparing it with illuminated badges from luxury carmakers. ### Source excerpt Apple revived the glowing logo, and turned it into the ultimate status symbol If you owned a MacBook before 2016, you remember the glowing apple on the lid. It lit up dorm rooms, airport gates, and every TV... ## Apple's first touchscreen MacBook leaves the iPad with an identity crisis DevFeed: [Apple's first touchscreen MacBook leaves the iPad with an identity crisis]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Sarang Sheth Published: 2026-10-28T21:31:33Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Yanko Design]() Topics: [ipad](), [touchscreen](), [macOS]() Tags: [ai](), [apple](), [apple-pencil](), [battery](), [battery-life](), [blender](), [canva](), [canvas](), [davinci-resolve](), [display](), [dynamic-island](), [ipad](), [laptops](), [laptops-news-apple-macbook-pro-touchscreen](), [macbook](), [macbook-pro](), [news](), [touchscreen](), [touchscreen-macbook]() ### AI overview The excerpt describes Apple's first touchscreen MacBook Pro with a tandem OLED display, positioning it alongside the iPad and foldable iPhone Duo. The 14- and 16-inch MacBook models add touch gestures, a Dynamic Island, and macOS interface adjustments; the article says taps translate to clicks for many existing apps, while developers can build richer touch interactions. It highlights the display's brightness, contrast, color coverage, reference modes, and lighter chassis, alongside retained ports and support for multiple external displays. The key limitation is no Apple Pencil support, which the author interprets as preserving a distinct role for iPad; the excerpt also notes the Duo will support Apple Pencil (USB-C), while iPad retains Pencil Pro. Prices start at $2,899, and the excerpt gives a November 6 shipping date. ### Source excerpt Apple's first touchscreen MacBook leaves the iPad with an identity crisis If the iPad were a person, this would be the week it checked its phone and found out its friends had started a group chat... ## Apple updates iMac, MacBook Pro, and Creator Studio DevFeed: [Apple updates iMac, MacBook Pro, and Creator Studio]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Jonny Evans Published: 2026-10-28T09:00:00Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [Computerworld]() Topics: [Artificial Intelligence](), [GPU](), [Image]() Tags: [ai](), [ai-performance](), [apple](), [apple-computers-and-peripherals-mac-macos-productivity-software](), [artificial-intelligence](), [battery](), [battery-life](), [bluetooth](), [camera](), [charging](), [chip](), [computers-and-peripherals](), [cpu](), [display](), [displays](), [edition-us](), [gpu](), [graphics](), [imac](), [language-en](), [mac](), [macbook](), [macbook-pro](), [macos](), [productivity](), [productivity-software](), [storytype-news](), [studio](), [updates]() ### AI overview Apple's launch updates put the M6 chip in the 14-inch MacBook Pro and iMac, and add AI features across Creator Studio. The MacBook Pro has a 12-core CPU and GPU, up to 32GB unified memory, and a claimed 24-hour battery life; Apple reports graphics up 30% over last year's model, or up to 11x versus M1. It adds Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, and support for two external 6K displays. The iMac retains its 24-inch 4.5K display and adds Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, up to four Thunderbolt 4 ports, and support for two external 6K displays; Apple claims twice the graphics performance of the M4 iMac. Creator Studio updates include MotionVFX effects and Pixelmator Pro editing in Final Cut Pro, drum separation in Logic Pro, natural-language Generate Fill in Pixelmator Pro, and beta AI assistants and MCP support in Keynote, Pages, and Numbers. The excerpt says the updates ship in November; it does not detail pricing or availability for Creator Studio. ### Source excerpt Apple's second day of launches this week saw it follow its tempting iPad mini upgrade by pumping up the processor in two of its most popular Macs, even while it injected artificial intelligence into Creator Studio. 24 hours of portable pro performance: 14-in MacBook Pro Apple's 14-inch MacBook Pro is popular but sits in a funny place in Apple's notebook lineup, with the powerful and popular MacBook Air biting at its heels and the more performant and powerful (though not yet M6) MacBook Pro models sitting above. We already know what the M6 chip is capable of, because it is already inside the Mac mini (which will be made in the US later this year). We know it delivers better single-core scores on Geekbench than the 10-core M5 MacBook Pro. We also know it beats that last MBP in multi-core. Now that same chip is available in a 14-inch MacBook Pro -- a really promising dose of power and performance in a highly portable pro Mac that now packs a mighty 24-hour battery life. The chip gives you a 12-core CPU, a 12-core GPU with Neural Accelerators in each core, a dual 16-core Neural Engine, and faster (16GB, upgradable up to 32GB) unified memory. What that means is power. And what that means is productivity -- 30% faster graphics compared to last year's model. For those upgrading from M1, the performance gains are even more significant, with up to 11x faster graphics and up to 13x faster AI performance. The idea is that you'll pick up your highly portable pro portable and take it anywhere you need it to be. Apple What's new in Apple's new portable pro laptop other than the processor? Networking has been enhanced with Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6. It will support up to two external 6K displays. Liquid Retina XDR display with up to 1,600 nits of peak brightness. 12-megapixel Center Stage camera. Support for fast charging. HDMI, MagSafe 3, three Thunderbolt 4 slots, SDXC card reader. Headphone jack. Available in Space Black and Silver. Pre-order from October 28, in stores November 6. ## Apple just launched a MacBook Pro 24-hours before its MacBook Pro event DevFeed: [Apple just launched a MacBook Pro 24-hours before its MacBook Pro event]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Sarang Sheth Published: 2026-10-27T20:30:44Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [Yanko Design]() Topics: [Pinebook-Pro](), [Mac Mini](), [ipad]() Tags: [4k](), [ai](), [announcement](), [apple](), [bandwidth](), [battery](), [battery-life](), [blender](), [bluetooth](), [broadcom](), [chip](), [cpu](), [event](), [laptops](), [laptops-product-design-apple-macbook-pro](), [macbook](), [macbook-pro](), [product-design]() ### AI overview Apple announced a 14-inch MacBook Pro with the M6 chip ahead of its Pro and Tell event. Starting at $1,999, it includes 16GB unified memory and 1TB storage; pre-orders open October 28, with deliveries beginning November 6. The 2nm M6 has a 12-core CPU and GPU, and Apple claims up to 30% faster graphics than M5. Apple's N1 chip adds Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, and Thread. Two 4K displays now support up to 165Hz; memory bandwidth reaches 170GB/s only on 24GB and 32GB configurations, while the 16GB base model remains at 153GB/s. The design, display, ports, and up-to-24-hour battery life carry over from M5. The article says the rumored touchscreen models arriving at the event use M5 Pro and M5 Max. It characterizes the M6 as an easy skip for M5 owners and a more sensible upgrade for Intel or early M1 users. ### Source excerpt Apple just launched a MacBook Pro 24-hours before its MacBook Pro event On Monday, the day the new iPad mini landed, I begged John Ternus to take a break. On Tuesday morning, Apple responded by dropping a... ## Apple introduces new 14-inch MacBook Pro with M6 chip and faster wireless DevFeed: [Apple introduces new 14-inch MacBook Pro with M6 chip and faster wireless]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Shawn Knight Published: 2026-10-27T16:16:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [TechSpot]() Topics: [Intel Core](), [On-device AI](), [Bluetooth]() Tags: [ai](), [ai-performance](), [apple](), [apple-silicon](), [bandwidth](), [chip](), [core](), [cpu](), [faster](), [gpu](), [graphics](), [hardware](), [laptop](), [m6](), [m6-chip](), [macbook](), [macbook-pro](), [memory](), [memory-bandwidth](), [neural](), [neural-engine](), [on-device](), [wireless]() ### AI overview Apple's refreshed 14-inch MacBook Pro adds an M6 chip and upgrades wireless connectivity to Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6. Apple says the 12-core CPU and GPU provide up to 30% faster graphics and 25% faster on-device AI than M5; its dual 16-core Neural Engine is claimed to be 1.9x faster. Memory bandwidth rises to 170GB/s from 153GB/s, but only with 24GB or 32GB RAM; the base model has 16GB. Battery life is rated up to 24 hours. The display, ports, storage, camera, speakers, dimensions, and weight remain as on the base M5 model. Preorders begin October 28 from $1,999, with shipping scheduled for November 6; a glare-reducing nano-texture display is an extra-cost option. ### Source excerpt The M6 features two additional CPU and GPU cores compared to the previous M5. According to Apple, the GPU delivers up to 30% faster graphics performance and 25% faster on-device AI performance. The dual 16-core Neural Engine, meanwhile, is said to be 1.9x faster than the M5. Memory bandwidth tops... Read Entire Article ## Recursive Releases Flint, an Open-Weight 40B MoE Local Coding Model for Agents with 2.5B Active Params DevFeed: [Recursive Releases Flint, an Open-Weight 40B MoE Local Coding Model for Agents with 2.5B Active Params]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Asif Razzaq Published: 2026-10-21T22:39:41Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [MarkTechPost]() Topics: [Local AI](), [Mixture of Experts (MoE)](), [agentic-coding](), [quantization](), [llama.cpp](), [Ollama]() Tags: [2](), [agentic-ai](), [agents](), [ai-infrastructure](), [ai-shorts](), [apache](), [apache-2-0](), [applications](), [artificial-intelligence](), [bench](), [coding](), [editors-pick](), [enterprise-ai](), [first](), [flint](), [for-devs](), [harness](), [language-model](), [large-language-model](), [local](), [macbook](), [macbook-pro](), [machine-learning](), [model](), [moe](), [open](), [open-source](), [releases](), [reports](), [software-engineering](), [staff](), [swe-bench](), [tech-news](), [technology](), [tokens](), [weight](), [with]() ### AI overview Recursive released Flint, an Apache 2.0, text-only MoE coding model with 39.8B total parameters and about 2.5B active per token. It supports agent tool calls and reports 74.2% on SWE-bench Verified, while scoring 54.9% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, below dense Qwen 3.8's reported 73.0%. Recursive says its automated Eureka Machine helped search the architecture and develop quantization and specialized kernels. Four-bit weights use about 23 GB; local use calls for 48 GB Apple Silicon or NVIDIA hardware, with reported speeds above 125 tokens per second on an M4 Pro MacBook Pro. Benchmark and speed figures are self-reported, and the excerpt notes the model trails the strongest dense models. ### Source excerpt Recursive has released Flint, an Apache 2.0 local coding model with 40B total and 2.5B active parameters. It reports 74.2% on SWE-bench Verified and 125+ tokens per second on an M4 Pro MacBook Pro. The post Recursive Releases Flint, an Open-Weight 40B MoE Local Coding Model for Agents with 2.5B Active Params appeared first on MarkTechPost. ## I'm starting to feel we're reaching a similar moment with Apple DevFeed: [I'm starting to feel we're reaching a similar moment with Apple]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Pieter Levels Published: 2026-08-21T00:00:00Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [@levelsio (Pieter Levels)]() Topics: [macOS](), [iOS](), [iphone](), [AI Chat]() Tags: [ai](), [android](), [apple](), [bugs](), [camera](), [dell](), [details](), [developers](), [enshittification](), [ios](), [iphone](), [linux](), [macbook-pro](), [macos](), [modern](), [omarchy](), [open](), [phone](), [picture](), [platforms](), [pos](), [tech]() ### AI overview The author sees Apple approaching a moment like the one when Windows' poor usability led them, as a PC user, to buy a MacBook Pro in 2013. They say Apple has long frustrated developers, but its software used to work well; lately, they report messy bugs in iOS and macOS, citing an iPhone camera that sometimes freezes in blur or stays black when opened quickly. They attribute the decline in attention to detail partly to Steve Jobs' absence and argue that losing developers could eventually push other users away. They also question whether Apple's limited AI investment leaves it without a moat. Although they had never considered switching before this year, they say moving from a MacBook Pro to a Dell XPS running Linux could lead them to replace their iPhone with Android. These are the author's views and hypothetical plans. ### Source excerpt I remember as a PC guy how I bought my first Apple device, a MacBook Pro, in 2013 I bought it because that's what my brother had (a pro VFX guy) and also a lot... ## Chrome achieves highest score ever on Speedometer 3.1, saving users millions of hours DevFeed: [Chrome achieves highest score ever on Speedometer 3.1, saving users millions of hours]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Chromium Blog (noreply@blogger.com) Published: 2025-06-05T17:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Chromium Blog]() Topics: [Google Chrome](), [performance-optimization](), [Benchmark](), [Web app](), [Front end](), [Web Development](), [Document Object Model (DOM)]() Tags: [22](), [apple](), [benchmark](), [blink](), [chrome](), [css](), [html](), [javascript](), [json](), [macbook-pro](), [macos](), [none](), [performance](), [rendering](), [saving](), [the-fast-and-the-curious](), [users]() ### AI overview Chrome reports a 22% improvement on Speedometer 3.1 since August 2024, with its score measured on an Apple MacBook Pro M4 running macOS 15. Speedometer, developed in open collaboration with other browsers, tests responsiveness across rendering tasks such as JavaScript and DOM work, CSS layout, text shaping, and pixel rendering. The excerpt attributes gains to memory-layout changes across DOM, CSS, layout, and painting; broader use of Oilpan garbage collection for some data; cheaper string representations and rapidhash; improved data-structure hashing and probing; more effective caching; and faster Apple Advanced Typography font shaping. The cited estimate of 116 million hours saved assumes each Chrome user uses the browser for 10 minutes a day. The supplied text ends during the article, so it does not establish that these are all the optimizations discussed. ### Source excerpt Update (6/10/2025): This blog was updated to reflect that testing was done using the Speedometer 3.1 benchmark, and resulted in a 22% performance improvement. The previous version incorrectly noted that the performance improvement was 10% and that the benchmark was Speedometer 3. Performance has always been one of the core pillars of Chrome and it's something we've never stopped investing in. Publicly available and open benchmarks, which we create in open collaboration with other browsers, are useful tools for tracking our overall progress, understanding new areas of improvement, and validating potential optimizations. In today's The Fast and the Curious post, we'd like to go through Chrome's recent work that enabled it to achieve the highest score ever on the Speedometer benchmark. For Speedometer, these optimizations have resulted in a 22% improvement since August 2024. That 22% improvement leads to better browser experiences, higher conversions for businesses, and deeper enjoyment of what the web has to offer. If each Chrome user used Chrome for just 10 minutes a day, these improvements collectively save 116 million hours or roughly 166 lifetimes worth of waiting around for websites to load and do things. Speedometer 3.1 score measured on Apple Macbook Pro M4 with MacOS 15 Speedometer is a benchmark created in open collaboration with other browsers and measures web application responsiveness through workloads that cover a large variety of different areas of the Blink rendering engine used in Chrome: HTML parsing JavaScript and JSON processing JavaScript and Document Object Model (DOM) interaction DOM manipulations (element insertion and removal) Text size computation (font shaping) Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) application and layout calculation Pixel rendering In essence, Speedometer tests critical components of the entire rendering pipeline. For a deeper dive into these individual parts, we recommend the presentation Life of a Script at Chrome University. Achievi ## Ammunition in the war against Teams Android build time DevFeed: [Ammunition in the war against Teams Android build time]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Saumye Srivastava Published: 2023-05-03T10:08:11Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Android@Microsoft]() Topics: [Gradle](), [Android](), [Continuous integration](), [gradle-plugin](), [Microsoft Teams]() Tags: [android](), [apple](), [apple-m1](), [build](), [builds](), [ci](), [continuous-integration](), [developer-productivity](), [gradle](), [macbook-pro](), [max](), [microsoft-teams](), [mobile-app-development](), [modules](), [monitoring](), [performance](), [pipelines](), [productivity](), [project](), [pull-request](), [teams](), [time]() ### AI overview Microsoft Teams Android reduced average build time from 9-10 minutes to under 5 minutes through a set of measured build and workflow changes. Gradle task telemetry captured execution time alongside machine, environment and changed-module details to track regressions and improvements. Upgrading Gradle versions reportedly improved build time by 30-40%, though upgrades also brought API deprecations, lint breakages and plugin changes. Other measures included disabling unnecessary debug-build steps, adopting non-transitive R after changing 1,600 files (reducing APK size by 2.6 MB and incremental build time by 13%), using Gradle lazy APIs and normalizing task inputs for caching, and applying kapt only where needed. These and compiler and configuration improvements together yielded 10-15%. Moving from Intel Macs to M1 Max machines improved builds by about 50%, with hardware requiring a business case. Configuration cache remained under review because of plugin incompatibilities. ### Source excerpt The mobile industry is an ever-evolving space, with new innovations and updates being introduced regularly. This means that the competition is fierce, and every day counts in shipping features and bug fixes. The time it takes to build an Android app is a crucial factor that impacts developer productivity, which in turn can affect the app's success. The percentage reduction in build time leads to percentage increase in shipping features and bug fixes. At Microsoft Teams Android, we understand this well and have been working relentlessly to improve our Android build time over the past quarter. Photo by Venti Views on Unsplash Our Android codebase comprises of 300+ modules that are contributed by hundreds of developers who run thousands of builds per day, both locally and in our Continuous Integration (CI) and Pull Request (PR) triggered pipelines. 1. Build Telemetry We aimed to start by setting a baseline for our build configuration and execution time on both the project and task levels. To do so, we collected telemetry from all developers in different environments and machines. We started with setting up build telemetry for each gradle task. For this we used TaskExecutionAdapter and BuildListener that sent build telemetry to our monitoring servers by listening via the Gradle.addListener API. Along with the gradle task execution time, we also sent device and development details, branch creation dates, cores, RAM, OS, and the list of modules changed. Shortened output format, {'Build_Time': 82, 'deviceId': '<>', 'modelName': 'MacBook Pro', 'modelIdentifier': 'MacBookPro18,2', 'processorName': 'Apple M1 Max', 'totalCores': '10 (8 performance and 2 efficiency)', 'memory': '32 GB', 'timezone': '+0530', 'task': 'preparekotlinbuildscriptmodel', 'taskData': '{}', 'os': 'Darwin', 'cleanBuild': False, 'totalTaskTime': 0, 'versionName': '1416/1.0.0.2023060799', 'modulesChanged': '["apps/teams", "common/beacon"]'} This helped us collect data and build monitoring on a daily basis ## Modern MacBook benchmarks for Android development DevFeed: [Modern MacBook benchmarks for Android development]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Kirill Rozov Published: 2022-01-29T15:56:46Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [Kirill Rozov]() Topics: [Benchmark](), [software-development](), [Android](), [Gradle](), [Intel Core]() Tags: [android](), [android-app-development](), [android-development](), [android-studio](), [androiddev](), [apple](), [apple-m1](), [apple-silicon](), [arm](), [benchmark](), [benchmarks](), [build](), [cpu](), [gradle](), [imac](), [intel](), [intel-core](), [jdk](), [mac](), [macbook](), [macbook-air](), [macbook-pro](), [performance]() ### AI overview Across six Android projects, Apple Silicon generally built faster than the tested 2019 Intel MacBook Pros. In ExoPlayer, the M1 scored 39.4 seconds, the 10-core M1 Pro/Max 28 seconds, and the best Intel result 43.9 seconds; in Telegram, which relies heavily on native C/C++ tooling, Intel i7 and i9 beat the MacBook Air M1 because its native compilation ran through Rosetta 2 while Android NDK support was incomplete. Results are averages of ten Gradle Profiler runs after two warm-ups, using Gradle 7.3.3 and JDK 11 (Zulu ARM on Apple Silicon). The author recommends an M1 Air with 16 GB RAM for most mobile developers, and a 10-core M1 Pro for larger projects or more memory; M1 Max showed no meaningful development benchmark advantage over M1 Pro. The comparison reflects the tested projects and software available at the time, heading into 2022. ### Source excerpt Photo by Danial Igdery https://unsplash.com/photos/FCHlYvR5gJI Choosing a device is never easy as it is, but the new Apple Silicon SoCs for Mac have given the market a good shake and made the choice even harder. Which MacBook should I buy? How different are they? It's hard to figure out. Besides, searching for thorough tests is one hell of a job. In this article, I'll give you a proper comparison of build speeds using some real-life Android projects and a number of different MacBook models. In addition to that, I'll tell you which one to buy heading into 2022. Test computers In this test, I used the latest MacBook Pro laptops powered by Intel as well as some of the latest MacBooks with M1. iMac 27" Late 2015 Intel Core i7 6700K | 24 GM RAM MacBook Pro 16" 2019 i7 9750H 6 CPU cores/12 threads | 16 GB RAM MacBook Pro 16" 2019 i9 9880H 8 CPU cores /16 threads | 32 GB RAM MacBook Air 2020 M1 | 16 GB RAM MacBook Pro 14" 2021 M1 Pro 8 CPU | 16 GB RAM MacBook Pro 14" 2021 M1 Pro 10 CPU | 32 GB RAM MacBook Pro 16" 2021 M1 Pro 10 CPU | 32 GB RAM MacBook Pro 16" M1 Max | 32 GB RAM I added my old iMac 27" Late 2015 to the test to see how much progress the new models of Macs made.Test method Making sure all computers work in equal conditions isn't easy, but I've tried to make it perfect: Using the latest revision of JDK 11. For Apple Silicon I used Zulu ARM JDK Using Gradle 7.3.3 to build projects (the latest available version in moment of testing) Disconnecting the external displays Connecting all computers to a power source Close as many programs as possible, including the background ones Close Android Studio! Switch computer into performance mode (if available) Placing all laptops on a hard flat surface to let the airflow come in and cool down the laptop Not touching the computers during tests Turning off the Spotlight indexing or adding the test project folder to exceptions. If you know of any other conditions to be considered before benchmark testing, I'd be happy to read