# Pricing Published articles for Pricing. This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles. ## Optimizing cost and latency with Amazon Bedrock prompt caching DevFeed: [Optimizing cost and latency with Amazon Bedrock prompt caching]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Daniel Abib Published: 2026-09-15T16:18:19Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Artificial Intelligence]() Topics: [Amazon Bedrock](), [Caching](), [Latency](), [API](), [foundation-models](), [LangChain](), [Multi-tenancy]() Tags: [advanced-300](), [amazon-bedrock](), [api](), [caching](), [foundation-models](), [integration](), [langchain](), [latency](), [pricing](), [technical-how-to](), [tokens]() ### AI overview This AWS post explains how Amazon Bedrock prompt caching can reduce repeated input-token costs by up to 90 percent and lower time to first token when requests reuse the same context. It presents six scenarios using the Converse API, including document, system prompt, tool definition, mixed TTL, tenant-isolated, and LangChain caching. ### Source excerpt Prompt caching in Amazon Bedrock can cut input token costs by up to 90% when you repeatedly send the same context to foundation models. This post walks through six practical prompt caching scenarios using the Converse API: message content, system prompt, tool definition, mixed TTL, tenant isolation, and LangChain integration. ## Pay only for what you use: introducing no spend minimums to Temporal Cloud DevFeed: [Pay only for what you use: introducing no spend minimums to Temporal Cloud]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Tlo Lorinc Published: 2026-09-14T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Temporal Blog]() Topics: [Cloud](), [cloud-infrastructure](), [App]() Tags: [announcements](), [billing](), [cloud](), [developer](), [pricing](), [sso](), [support]() ### AI overview Temporal introduces a Paygo offering for Temporal Cloud with no base monthly fee, usage-based pricing, Developer Support, and SAML SSO included. The article explains pricing, support terms, storage charges, and migration options for existing self-service customers. ### Source excerpt Start building on Temporal Cloud with no base monthly fee, usage-based pricing, and Developer Support that scales with your application. ## 7 Best m3ter Alternatives for Usage-Based Billing in 2026 DevFeed: [7 Best m3ter Alternatives for Usage-Based Billing in 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Deepak Jangir Published: 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Software as a service](), [data]() Tags: [alternatives](), [b2b](), [billing](), [comparison](), [cost](), [guide](), [merchant-of-record](), [pricing](), [saas](), [usage-based-billing]() ### AI overview A comparison guide examining seven alternatives to m3ter for usage-based billing. It focuses on pricing transparency, metering depth, quote-to-cash fit, and Merchant of Record coverage, while explaining m3ter's allowance-based pricing, implementation model, integrations, and separation from payment and tax liability. ### Source excerpt Compare 7 m3ter alternatives on pricing transparency, usage metering depth, quote-to-cash fit, and Merchant of Record coverage for B2B SaaS and AI companies. ## Introducing Flat Rate CDN DevFeed: [Introducing Flat Rate CDN]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Eric Dodds Published: 2026-09-08T04:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [Vercel](), [networking](), [Internet]() Tags: [billing](), [network](), [performance](), [pricing](), [vercel]() ### AI overview Vercel introduces Flat Rate CDN for Pro teams, replacing usage-based CDN billing with predictable monthly pricing, built-in protection against traffic spikes, and service tiers for different traffic profiles. The plan covers CDN requests and data transfer without surprise overages while retaining access to Vercel's premium network and routing performance. ### Source excerpt Over the past year, we have improved Vercel's Pro pricing to better reflect how teams build, with expanded user roles, flexible credits, access to enterprise features, and more. But one area our customers continued to give us feedback on was CDN pricing. CDN costs should be predictable, but viral launches, traffic bursts, or misconfigured routes sometimes turned an otherwise normal month into an unexpected bill. For teams building on Vercel, that uncertainty made growth feel like a problem at exactly the moment it should feel exciting. Today, we are introducing Flat Rate CDN for Pro teams: a new way to pay for CDN usage with a predictable monthly bill, built-in spike protection, and service tiers designed for different traffic profiles. What is Flat Rate CDN? Flat Rate CDN is an alternative to usage-based CDN billing that provides you with a predictable monthly bill. The model is designed around a simple idea: teams should be able to choose the CDN capacity that corresponds to their typical usage profile, pay a known amount monthly, and avoid surprise overages from temporary spikes. Flat Rate CDN has several advantages over usage-based billing: Fixed monthly price: Pay a fixed amount for Vercel CDN each month. Covers traffic spikes: CDN Requests, Fast Data Transfer, and other resources are no longer billed directly, so spikes don't result in surprise bills. No overages: Your bill will never increase because of temporary usage spikes. Importantly, predictable pricing does not mean lower-quality bandwidth. Every request still runs on Vercel's premium network, including private fiber that routes around congestion on the public internet, which can improve performance by up to 60%. Comparable routing is often sold as a premium add-on, but Vercel includes it by default for Pro teams, and performance isn't degraded during traffic spikes. How it works All new Pro teams have Flat Rate CDN enabled by default, and existing Pro teams can opt in. Usage is tracked at the team lev ## Mintlify introduces fixed, outcome-based pricing for AI actions DevFeed: [Mintlify introduces fixed, outcome-based pricing for AI actions]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Han Wang Published: 2026-09-08T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Mintlify Blog]() Topics: [Artificial Intelligence](), [Automation](), [Documentation](), [Slack]() Tags: [agent](), [ai](), [announcements](), [automation](), [pricing](), [slack](), [updates]() ### AI overview Mintlify announces fixed credit prices for AI actions, charging for assistant answers and automation updates while making unsuccessful answers and automations with nothing to update free. The company says plan allowances and per-credit prices remain unchanged, and reports that most teams will use the same or fewer credits. ### Source excerpt Every AI action in Mintlify now has a fixed credit price, and you only pay when we deliver a result. Assistant answers and automation updates cost credits. Everything else is free. ## Auth0 vs Frontegg vs WorkOS: Who's actually enterprise ready in 2026? DevFeed: [Auth0 vs Frontegg vs WorkOS: Who's actually enterprise ready in 2026?]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: WorkOS Published: 2026-09-07T00:00:00Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [WorkOS Blog]() Topics: [Auth0](), [Single sign-on (SSO)](), [Authentication](), [Authorization]() Tags: [auth0](), [comparison](), [enterprise](), [feature](), [pricing](), [sso]() ### AI overview The article compares Auth0, Frontegg, and WorkOS on enterprise readiness by checking vendors' pricing pages for self-service SSO and SCIM, enterprise features, and costs at scale. It highlights conflicting information on Auth0's pricing page about Self-Service SSO and describes a footnote requiring an upgrade to B2B to continue using certain features. ### Source excerpt We checked the roundups' claims against all three vendors' own pricing pages, using one test: can your customer's IT admin configure SSO and SCIM themselves, on the plan you already pay for? ## Track LLM API Costs with genai-prices DevFeed: [Track LLM API Costs with genai-prices]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Rick Donato Published: 2026-09-01T11:16:32Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Packet Coders - Learn Network Automation]() Topics: [Large Language Model](), [API](), [Inference](), [Library](), [Python](), [Binance]() Tags: [api](), [cost](), [example](), [genai](), [inference](), [install](), [library](), [llm](), [openai](), [pricing](), [python](), [report](), [request](), [tips](), [token](), [uv]() ### AI overview A tutorial introducing the genai-prices Python library for estimating the cost of calling LLM inference APIs. It explains that the library can avoid maintaining a custom pricing table and can report token counts and cost for each request, with an OpenAI installation and usage example. ### Source excerpt Tip: Use the genai-prices Python library to calculate the estimated cost of calling LLM inference APIs. This avoids maintaining your own pricing table and lets you report token counts and cost for each request. Below is an example: # Install: uv add openai genai-prices from openai import OpenAI from ## Compute that takes any shape DevFeed: [Compute that takes any shape]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Luke Phillips-Sheard Published: 2026-09-01T07:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [Cloud](), [Provisioning](), [cloud-infrastructure](), [Vercel](), [cpu](), [IO](), [DRIVE]() Tags: [agent](), [cloud](), [code](), [compute](), [cpu](), [image](), [infrastructure](), [io](), [memory](), [pricing](), [real-time](), [sandbox](), [storage](), [vercel]() ### AI overview Vercel presents Fluid as a unified compute system that assembles machines for different workloads, changes configuration dynamically, and absorbs burst capacity in real time. It supports builds, sandboxes, and functions, using isolated virtual machines, custom images, and separate storage connections. ### Source excerpt Workloads differ in how long they run, how much memory they take, and how much of the environment they control. That previously meant a different compute primitive for each job, so product iterations required provisioning infrastructure, not just working on a feature. We built Vercel so that none of this has to be your problem. The compute layer is a single system with a simple job. Take any workload, assemble the machine it needs, swap configuration on the fly, and absorb burst capacity in real time. We call this Fluid. Builds ran on it first, then sandboxes, and now functions. If you've shipped on Vercel, you've been on Fluid without knowing it. Fluid compute now runs over 15 million builds a day, 25 million sandboxes a week, and a trillion requests a month. A history of compute Changing a machine used to mean changing it by hand. You went down to the computer store, bought a hard drive or a stick of RAM, and swapped it in yourself. Then you could rent bare metal when you needed it, and use it to serve a website, host a database, or send email. Then the cloud let you request a machine in any configuration you wanted, choose its operating system, use it, and throw it away when you were done. For agents, even the cloud is too slow. A standard VM can't provision fast enough to keep up with how they work, but this is where Fluid excels. How a workload runs on Fluid When a workload comes in, Fluid assembles a machine to fit its shape. If an agent needs to run code, Hive provides an isolated VM, usually one already warm, so it's ready instantly. Your own image boots on top as the environment. A Drive connects, and your files are right where you left them, because storage was never tied to the machine. Each workload needs something different. A build is compute-bound, so it wants a beefy machine, heavy on CPU and memory. A function is IO-bound, loading specific code to run the instant a request lands, usually on a small VM. A sandbox is flexibility-bound, taking whatever ## 8 Best Memberstack Alternatives for Membership Sites in 2026 DevFeed: [8 Best Memberstack Alternatives for Membership Sites in 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Deepak Jangir Published: 2026-09-01T00:00:00Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Authentication](), [stripe](), [Front end]() Tags: [alternatives](), [auth](), [billing](), [comparison](), [compliance](), [developers](), [fees](), [merchant-of-record](), [payments](), [pricing](), [soc](), [stripe](), [tax](), [webflow]() ### AI overview This comparison examines eight Memberstack alternatives for membership sites, focusing on authentication, gated content, member billing, transaction fees, and global tax responsibilities. It distinguishes lower-cost or more flexible auth and gating platforms from merchant-of-record services such as Dodo Payments, which handle billing and tax compliance. It also explains Memberstack's strengths, pricing options, trial, discounts, and compliance claims. ### Source excerpt Compare the best Memberstack alternatives for auth, gated content and member billing. Verified 2026 pricing, transaction fees, and global tax handling. ## 7 Best RevenueCat Alternatives for App Subscriptions in 2026 DevFeed: [7 Best RevenueCat Alternatives for App Subscriptions in 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Deepak Jangir Published: 2026-09-01T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [App](), [Software](), [Google]() Tags: [alternatives](), [apple](), [billing](), [google](), [merchant-of-record](), [payment-processing](), [payments](), [pricing](), [september-2026](), [subscriptions](), [web]() ### AI overview This article compares RevenueCat alternatives for app subscriptions in 2026, focusing on subscription infrastructure, fee stacking, and web checkout. It explains that in-app purchases incur both app-store commissions and RevenueCat's tracked-revenue fee, while web subscriptions can replace platform commissions with payment-processing and optional merchant-of-record fees. ### Source excerpt Compare the best RevenueCat alternatives for mobile subscription management. Verified 2026 pricing, web checkout options, and how to cut app store fees. ## AWS PrivateLink is now available on Pro and Enterprise DevFeed: [AWS PrivateLink is now available on Pro and Enterprise]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Bryan Mishkin Published: 2026-09-01T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [Vercel](), [Network](), [Amazon Web Services](), [AWS IAM](), [Amazon S3](), [MongoDB]() Tags: [aws](), [enterprise](), [iam](), [mongodb](), [networking](), [pricing](), [s3](), [vercel]() ### AI overview Vercel has made AWS PrivateLink available to Pro and Enterprise teams through Advanced Networking. Vercel Functions and builds can privately access AWS-hosted databases, SaaS services, internal services behind an AWS Network Load Balancer, and S3 or DynamoDB without using the public internet. ### Source excerpt AWS PrivateLink is now available for Pro and Enterprise teams as part of Advanced Networking. It allows Vercel Functions and builds to connect to AWS-hosted services without sending traffic over the public internet. Use it to reach AWS-hosted databases such as RDS, Aurora, and Neon; SaaS services such as Snowflake and MongoDB Atlas; internal services behind an AWS Network Load Balancer; and S3 or DynamoDB through gateway endpoints. To configure PrivateLink, open your project's Networking settings and enable Advanced Networking. Select New Connection, then enter the service name and region. The service must accept connections from all AWS principals or allowlist the IAM role Vercel provides for your team. Vercel creates the connection and provides a stable hostname. Use this hostname from your Functions and builds to reach the service privately. Pricing: The first AWS PrivateLink connection is included with Advanced Networking. Each additional connection costs $30 per month. PrivateLink data transfer costs $0.04 per GB. Learn more in the AWS PrivateLink documentation. Read more ## 3 ways to optimize Firebase Remote Config fetch usage DevFeed: [3 ways to optimize Firebase Remote Config fetch usage]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Sumit Chandel; Siddhant Jain Published: 2026-08-31T00:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Firebase Blog]() Topics: [Firebase](), [App](), [configuration](), [Latency](), [Network](), [cross-platform]() Tags: [a-b-testing](), [battery](), [best-practices](), [feature-rollouts](), [firebase](), [firebase-remote-config](), [latency](), [network](), [pricing](), [remote-config]() ### AI overview This article presents three strategies for reducing Firebase Remote Config fetch traffic. It explains how smarter fetch and activation patterns can reduce network overhead, latency, battery consumption, and usage-based costs. ### Source excerpt Reduce network fetches, battery consumption and usage costs ## Temporal expands its Google Cloud Partnership with Gemini integration and pay-as-you-go pricing on Google Cloud Marketplace DevFeed: [Temporal expands its Google Cloud Partnership with Gemini integration and pay-as-you-go pricing on Google Cloud Marketplace]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Jay Sivachelvan Published: 2026-08-31T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Temporal Blog]() Topics: [Google Cloud Platform (GCP)](), [SDKs](), [Google](), [reliability](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Cloud Run](), [Resilience](), [API](), [Serverless]() Tags: [agent](), [agent-development-kit](), [agent-framework](), [announcements](), [api](), [billing](), [cloud-marketplace](), [cloud-run](), [execution](), [gemini](), [google](), [google-cloud](), [integration](), [launch](), [partnership](), [pricing]() ### AI overview Temporal announces expanded Google Cloud integrations, including Public Preview support for the Google Gen AI Python SDK, durable execution for Gemini-based workflows, and pre-release Serverless Workers for Google Cloud Run. Temporal Cloud is also available on Google Cloud Marketplace with pay-as-you-go pricing. ### Source excerpt Temporal expands its Google Cloud partnership with Gemini integration, durable execution, and pay-as-you-go pricing on Google Cloud Marketplace. ## 7 Whop Alternatives for Creators and SaaS Sellers in 2026 DevFeed: [7 Whop Alternatives for Creators and SaaS Sellers in 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Deepak Jangir Published: 2026-08-31T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Software as a service](), [Software](), [stripe]() Tags: [alternatives](), [comparison](), [creators](), [cross-border](), [crypto](), [fees](), [global](), [india](), [merchant-of-record](), [payments](), [pricing](), [saas](), [stripe](), [subscriptions](), [us](), [usage-based-billing](), [vat]() ### AI overview A comparison of seven Whop alternatives for creators and SaaS sellers, focusing on effective fees, international transactions, payouts, tax handling, and fit for software businesses. ### Source excerpt Whop's headline 2.7% + 30c climbs toward 7% once FX and payout fees stack. Compare seven alternatives with verified 2026 pricing and pick the right fit. ## MiniMax H3 and H3 Max are 50% off on AI Gateway DevFeed: [MiniMax H3 and H3 Max are 50% off on AI Gateway]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Jerilyn Zheng Published: 2026-08-30T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [Artificial Intelligence](), [API](), [API keys](), [dashboards](), [browser]() Tags: [ai](), [ai-gateway](), [api](), [audio](), [browser](), [generate](), [generation](), [image](), [model](), [models](), [pricing]() ### AI overview MiniMax H3 and H3 Max receive a 50% discount on Vercel AI Gateway from August 30 through September 13. H3 supports 2K video generation from text, images, video, and audio inputs, while H3 Max offers faster 480p and 768p rendering from text or a starting image. Existing model IDs remain unchanged, so no code changes are required. ### Source excerpt MiniMax H3 and H3 Max are 50% off on AI Gateway from August 30 through September 13, in partnership with MiniMax. The discount covers requests billed through AI Gateway, at every duration and in every aspect ratio the model supports. H3 generates 2K video from a text prompt, a starting image, a pair of first and last frames, or reference images, video, and audio. H3 Max trades resolution for speed: it renders faster at 480p and 768p, and it takes a text prompt or a starting image. The model IDs (minimax/minimax-h3 and minimax/minimax-h3-max) are unchanged, so requests you already send pick up the discounted rate with no code change: Renders take minutes, so poll runs the generation as a background job and makes short status requests until it lands, rather than holding one long request open. See asynchronous generation for the webhook and start-and-status routes. Get started Create an API key in the AI Gateway section of your dashboard, or generate a clip in the browser first from the model playground. Current rates for every model are on the pricing page. You can view all video models available on AI Gateway. Read more ## Recurly vs Stripe: Billing Layer Costs Compared for 2026 DevFeed: [Recurly vs Stripe: Billing Layer Costs Compared for 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Deepak Jangir Published: 2026-08-30T00:00:00Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [stripe](), [Transactions](), [Shopify]() Tags: [billing](), [comparison](), [payment](), [payments](), [pricing](), [saas](), [subscriptions](), [usage-based-billing]() ### AI overview A comparison of Recurly and Stripe Billing as competing subscription billing layers, covering published 2026 pricing, included features, payment processing costs, and the billing volumes at which each option becomes cheaper. ### Source excerpt Recurly vs Stripe for subscriptions: compare Recurly's $249 + 0.9% against Stripe Billing's 0.7%, find the crossover volumes, and see what neither one covers. ## Paddle vs Lemon Squeezy: Same 5% + 50c, Very Different Bets DevFeed: [Paddle vs Lemon Squeezy: Same 5% + 50c, Very Different Bets]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Deepak Jangir Published: 2026-08-28T00:00:00Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [stripe](), [Software as a service]() Tags: [2026](), [comparison](), [digital-products](), [fraud](), [merchant-of-record](), [payments](), [pricing](), [recovery](), [saas](), [support](), [tax]() ### AI overview This comparison argues that Paddle and Lemon Squeezy have the same headline Merchant of Record pricing but target different customers. Paddle is positioned for B2B SaaS at scale, while Lemon Squeezy is aimed at indie makers and digital products. The article also explains how Stripe's acquisition of Lemon Squeezy and the rollout of Stripe Managed Payments change the comparison in 2026. ### Source excerpt Paddle and Lemon Squeezy both charge 5% + 50c as Merchant of Record. Compare who they serve, what changed after Stripe bought Lemon Squeezy, and the real costs. ## Harness Cloud pricing update: lower per-minute rates DevFeed: [Harness Cloud pricing update: lower per-minute rates]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Nofar Bluestein Published: 2026-08-27T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Harness Blog]() Topics: [Cloud](), [Hardware](), [Linux](), [macOS]() Tags: [2026](), [apple](), [cloud](), [hardware](), [linux](), [macos](), [pricing](), [update]() ### AI overview Harness is lowering per-minute pricing for most Harness Cloud resource classes effective September 1, 2026. The update adds Apple M4 macOS hardware, smaller Linux tiers, and price reductions for macOS, Linux, and Windows, while the Linux 8-core medium rate increases for some accounts. ### Source excerpt See the September 1, 2026 Harness Cloud pricing updates, featuring lower per-minute rates, new Apple M4 macOS hardware, and new, smaller Linux resource classes. | Blog ## Pipes compared to Nango, Composio, Arcade, Paragon, and Merge DevFeed: [Pipes compared to Nango, Composio, Arcade, Paragon, and Merge]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: WorkOS Published: 2026-08-27T00:00:00Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [WorkOS Blog]() Topics: [Tool](), [API](), [MCP](), [Model Context Protocol](), [Deployment]() Tags: [api](), [comparison](), [deployment](), [integrations](), [mcp](), [pricing](), [tool]() ### AI overview A comparison of Pipes, Nango, Composio, Arcade, Paragon, and Merge, examining their positions across credential, integration-runtime, and agent-tool layers. It covers catalog units, synchronization, agent capabilities, deployment, pricing, and product-selection considerations. ### Source excerpt Six products, three layers of the same stack, and one vendor that sits in two of them. Catalog units, sync, the agent story, deployment, pricing, and when to pick each. ## The Best WordPress Hosting in 2026 DevFeed: [The Best WordPress Hosting in 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Paul Andrew Published: 2026-08-26T09:25:27Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [Speckyboy Design Magazine]() Topics: [WordPress](), [WordPress Hosting](), [hosting](), [Caching](), [Security](), [dev-tools](), [ssh](), [SSL]() Tags: [caching](), [comparison](), [developer-tools](), [hosting](), [performance](), [pricing](), [security](), [ssh](), [ssl](), [support](), [tools](), [web-hosting](), [wordpress](), [wordpress-hosting]() ### AI overview A comparison of six WordPress hosting providers--WordPress.com, Bluehost, Pressable, Cloudways, Kinsta, and SiteGround--covering performance, traffic handling, uptime, pricing, support, management, security, backups, staging, caching, CDN access, and developer tools. It explains that different site types have different hosting needs and provides recommendations for common WordPress projects. ### Source excerpt Compare the best WordPress hosting providers for 2026, including pricing, performance, tools, support, and options for different types of sites. The post The Best WordPress Hosting in 2026 appeared first on Speckyboy Design Magazine. ## Qwen 3.8 Flash now available on AI Gateway DevFeed: [Qwen 3.8 Flash now available on AI Gateway]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Jerilyn Zheng Published: 2026-08-26T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [qwen](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [SDKs](), [AI-assisted coding](), [long-context](), [Claude Code](), [codex](), [cursor]() Tags: [ai](), [ai-gateway](), [api-keys](), [claude-code](), [codex](), [coding-agents](), [context-window](), [cost](), [cursor](), [opencode](), [pricing](), [qwen](), [routing](), [sdk](), [tokens](), [vercel]() ### AI overview Qwen 3.8 Flash from Alibaba is now available through Vercel AI Gateway. The model accepts text and images, supports a 1-million-token context window, and can generate responses of up to 65,000 tokens. It is recommended for coding, tool use, and multi-step agent workflows, and can be used through the AI SDK, coding agents, and the model playground. AI Gateway offers unified model access, usage and cost tracking, reliability features, reporting, retention controls, API key budgets, routing, and provider pricing without markup or inference platform fees. ### Source excerpt Qwen 3.8 Flash from Alibaba is now available on AI Gateway. It takes text and images as input, serves a context window of 1 million tokens, and can return up to 65k tokens in a response. Alibaba recommends it for coding, tool use, and multi-step agent workflows. To use Qwen3.8-Flash, set model to alibaba/qwen3.8-flash in the AI SDK: To use it in a coding agent, see the coding agents guide, then run vercel ai-gateway coding-agents setup to connect agents like Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, Pi, and more and select alibaba/qwen3.8-flash inside the agent. Try Qwen3.8-Flash in the model playground. AI Gateway provides a unified API for calling models, tracking usage and cost, and configuring retries, failover, and performance optimizations for higher-than-provider uptime. It includes built-in custom reporting, Zero Data Retention support, budgets for API keys, routing rules, and more. AI Gateway reflects provider pricing with no markup and does not charge a platform fee on inference, including on Bring Your Own Key (BYOK) requests. Read more ## Muse Image now available on AI Gateway DevFeed: [Muse Image now available on AI Gateway]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Jerilyn Zheng Published: 2026-08-26T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [Artificial Intelligence](), [Meta](), [vercel ai sdk](), [API](), [superintelligence](), [Inference]() Tags: [ai](), [ai-gateway](), [api](), [image](), [inference](), [meta](), [meta-muse](), [model](), [models](), [muse](), [pricing](), [sdk](), [superintelligence](), [uptime]() ### AI overview Muse Image, Meta Superintelligence Labs' first image model, is now available through Vercel's AI Gateway. It supports both image generation from prompts and instruction-based image editing, including reference images, through the AI SDK. AI Gateway also provides unified model access, usage and cost tracking, failover, routing, reporting, budgets, and performance optimizations without markup or platform fees on inference. ### Source excerpt Muse Image from Meta Superintelligence Labs is now available on AI Gateway. It is their first image model and a separate family from Muse Spark, returning images rather than text. Send a prompt and get an image back, or send an image with an instruction and get it changed. One model does both, so you don't switch models to move from generating to editing. To use Muse Image, set model to meta/muse-image-1.0 and call generateImage from the AI SDK: To steer the result toward art you already have, pass reference images in prompt.images alongside the text, and the model blends them into what it draws. Editing Pass the image you want changed in prompt.images with an instruction, and the model changes what you asked for and leaves the rest: Try Muse Image in the model playground. AI Gateway provides a unified API for calling models, tracking usage and cost, failover, and performance optimizations for higher-than-provider uptime. It includes built-in custom reporting, budgets for API keys, routing rules, and more. AI Gateway reflects provider pricing with no markup and does not charge a platform fee on inference, including on Bring Your Own Key (BYOK) requests. You can view all image models available on AI Gateway. Read more ## Lemon Squeezy vs Stripe: Which One Should You Pick in 2026? DevFeed: [Lemon Squeezy vs Stripe: Which One Should You Pick in 2026?]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Deepak Jangir Published: 2026-08-25T00:00:00Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [stripe](), [API](), [Software]() Tags: [api](), [chargebacks](), [checkout](), [comparison](), [compliance](), [merchant-of-record](), [payment](), [payments](), [pricing](), [saas](), [stripe](), [tax](), [vat]() ### AI overview A 2026 comparison of Lemon Squeezy and Stripe, focusing on their changing relationship after Stripe's acquisition of Lemon Squeezy, differences between Stripe's PSP model and Merchant of Record offerings, pricing, tax liability, and Stripe Managed Payments. ### Source excerpt Lemon Squeezy vs Stripe in 2026: compare the 5% + 50c MoR model against Stripe's 2.9% + 30c PSP pricing, plus what Stripe Managed Payments changes for both. ## AWS Glue 6.0 now available with 30% lower price and full Apache Iceberg v3 support DevFeed: [AWS Glue 6.0 now available with 30% lower price and full Apache Iceberg v3 support]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Channy Yun (윤석찬) Published: 2026-08-21T18:53:26Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [AWS News Blog]() Topics: [Apache Iceberg](), [Amazon Web Services](), [Apache Spark](), [Python](), [Scala](), [Geographic Information System](), [Internet of things]() Tags: [analytics](), [apache](), [apache-iceberg](), [aws](), [aws-glue](), [launch](), [news](), [performance](), [pricing](), [python-3-13](), [real-time](), [release](), [scala](), [spark](), [streaming]() ### AI overview AWS Glue 6.0 is generally available with 30% lower pricing, a modernized Spark 4.1 runtime, Python 3.13 and Scala 2.13 support, and full Apache Iceberg v3 support. The release adds improved handling of semi-structured data, declarative ETL pipelines, faster PySpark execution, and real-time streaming with single-digit millisecond latency. ### Source excerpt AWS Glue 6.0 is built on a fully modernized runtime, Apache Spark 4.1, Python 3.13, and Scala 2.13, delivering 30% lower pricing than previous AWS Glue versions. [Next page]()