# providers Published articles for providers. This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles. ## Open-weight models now handle a majority of tokens on Vercel's AI Gateway. But Anthropic still takes 64% of the spend. DevFeed: [Open-weight models now handle a majority of tokens on Vercel's AI Gateway. But Anthropic still takes 64% of the spend.]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Paul Sawers Published: 2026-09-18T12:42:58Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [The New Stack]() Topics: [Artificial Intelligence](), [gateway](), [Vercel](), [model-deployment](), [API]() Tags: [ai](), [ai-infrastructure](), [anthropic](), [api](), [developers](), [inference](), [infrastructure](), [large-language-models](), [production](), [providers](), [vercel]() ### AI overview Vercel reports that open-weight models handled 56% of tokens routed through its AI Gateway in August, up from 7% in December 2025. Despite that volume, Anthropic accounted for 64% of spending, illustrating the difference between token usage and model costs. ### Source excerpt The trend is clear: open-weight models are taking an increasingly large bite out of production AI usage. On Monday, The The post Open-weight models now handle a majority of tokens on Vercel's AI Gateway. But Anthropic still takes 64% of the spend. appeared first on The New Stack. ## OpenRouter provider fallbacks can cause inconsistent model behavior DevFeed: [OpenRouter provider fallbacks can cause inconsistent model behavior]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Simon Willison Published: 2026-09-11T22:49:18Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Simon Willison's Weblog]() Topics: [API](), [Large Language Model](), [Software]() Tags: [ai](), [ai-2-236](), [api](), [cost](), [generative-ai](), [generative-ai-1-982](), [llms](), [llms-1-948](), [model](), [models](), [news](), [openrouter](), [openrouter-32](), [providers](), [reasoning](), [serve]() ### AI overview OpenRouter's automatic provider fallbacks can produce inconsistent behavior for the same model because providers use different serving software, optimizations, and settings. The article notes differences in vision support and reasoning-effort handling, and points to provider.only and /endpoints for controlling or inspecting routing. ### Source excerpt So you want to use OpenRouter? One of OpenRouter's selling points is that it "handles fallbacks automatically and picks the most cost-effective option for each request", so you can call a single API endpoint for a model and get routed to the best available backend provider. Mohamed Moustafa points out a whole set of ways that this can cause you problems. Different providers run different serving software with different optimizations and settings, which means that the same OpenRouter endpoint can serve model requests that behave in different ways. Some providers even lack vision capability for vision models, and the way the reasoning effort option is processed can differ as well. Thankfully you can control which provider is routed to using the provider.only option. The /endpoints method returns the list of available providers for a specific model ID. Via Hacker News Tags: ai, generative-ai, llms, openrouter ## PayZephyr: One Payment API for Stripe, Paystack, and PayPal DevFeed: [PayZephyr: One Payment API for Stripe, Paystack, and PayPal]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Paul Redmond Published: 2026-09-11T01:46:25Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Laravel]() Topics: [Laravel](), [API](), [stripe]() Tags: [api](), [checkout](), [failover](), [installation](), [integration](), [laravel](), [laravel-packages](), [payment](), [payments](), [production](), [protection](), [providers](), [stripe](), [subscription](), [webhooks]() ### AI overview PayZephyr is a Laravel payments package that provides one API for eight payment providers. It supports automatic failover, double-charge protection, signed webhooks, subscriptions, refunds, Composer installation, custom drivers, queue integration, and a playground. ### Source excerpt PayZephyr gives Laravel one payment API across Stripe, PayPal, Paystack, Flutterwave, and four more, with failover and double-charge protection. The post PayZephyr: One Payment API for Stripe, Paystack, and PayPal appeared first on Laravel News. Join the Laravel Newsletter to get Laravel articles like this directly in your inbox. ## OIDC is a standard, identity providers are not DevFeed: [OIDC is a standard, identity providers are not]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: WorkOS Published: 2026-09-09T16:09:50Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [WorkOS Blog]() Topics: [OpenID connect (OIDC)](), [interoperability](), [OAuth](), [JSON Web Tokens](), [Authentication]() Tags: [compatibility](), [interoperability](), [jwt](), [oauth](), [oidc](), [providers]() ### AI overview This article explains why generic OpenID Connect integrations often require provider-specific compatibility settings. It discusses differences in token-endpoint client authentication, including client secret basic, client secret POST, and private key JWT. ### Source excerpt Generic OIDC connections meet identity providers that read the same spec differently. Here are the per-connection compatibility settings we added, and why. ## The case of the progress callback that never got called when progress happened DevFeed: [The case of the progress callback that never got called when progress happened]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Raymond Chen Published: 2026-09-03T14:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Raymond Chen]() Topics: [debugging](), [C#](), [debug](), [Code]() Tags: [breakpoint](), [c-plus-plus](), [c-sharp](), [code](), [debugging](), [handler](), [old-new-thing](), [providers]() ### AI overview A progress callback is never invoked because an intermediary method returns its own operation without forwarding progress reports from the provider's underlying operation. The suggested fix is to return the provider's operation directly so callers can attach to its progress. ### Source excerpt Are you talking to the right guy? The post The case of the progress callback that never got called when progress happened appeared first on The Old New Thing. ## Build Your Own AI-Powered Slack Bot with the Laravel AI SDK DevFeed: [Build Your Own AI-Powered Slack Bot with the Laravel AI SDK]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Freek Van der Herten (freek@spatie.be) Published: 2026-08-31T12:59:25Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [freek.dev - all blogposts]() Topics: [Laravel](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [SDK](), [Slack]() Tags: [ai](), [build](), [knowledge-base](), [laravel](), [php](), [providers](), [sdk](), [slack](), [spatie](), [tasks](), [tools]() ### AI overview A tutorial on building an AI-powered Slack bot with the Laravel AI SDK. The bot can switch AI providers, answer questions, execute tasks, and retrieve information from a controlled knowledge base. ### Source excerpt In this article, we'll build an AI-powered Slack bot with the Laravel AI SDK. Unlike tools such as Claude Tag, it can switch AI providers, answer questions, execute tasks, and retrieve information from a knowledge base you control. Read more ## Refresh token behavior across fourteen providers DevFeed: [Refresh token behavior across fourteen providers]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: WorkOS Published: 2026-08-31T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [WorkOS Blog]() Topics: [OAuth](), [API]() Tags: [providers](), [retry](), [rotation](), [token](), [tokens]() ### AI overview This article compares documented OAuth refresh-token behavior across fourteen providers, including token rotation, expiration reporting, grace periods, and revocation on reuse. It explains how rotation affects persistence and retry handling, with examples including Google, Box, Atlassian, Dropbox, Asana, GitHub, and Salesforce. ### Source excerpt Which providers rotate refresh tokens, which return expires_in, which give you a grace period, and which revoke on reuse. One row per provider, verified against provider documentation in August 2026. ## Pulumi Kubernetes v4.34.0: CRDs as provider extensions DevFeed: [Pulumi Kubernetes v4.34.0: CRDs as provider extensions]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Guinevere Saenger Published: 2026-08-28T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Pulumi]() Topics: [Kubernetes](), [Extension](), [SDKs](), [YAML](), [ingress-nginx]() Tags: [extensions](), [install](), [kubernetes](), [migration](), [product](), [providers](), [release](), [releases](), [sdk](), [sdks](), [yaml]() ### AI overview Pulumi Kubernetes provider v4.34.0 adds support for extending the provider with Kubernetes Custom Resource Definitions through a manifest and the new --extension flag. The release generates SDKs, supports all supported Pulumi languages including YAML, uses a single provider instance, and provides a migration path from crd2pulumi. ### Source excerpt We're really excited to bring you v4.34.0, the newest version of the Pulumi Kubernetes provider, which includes improved support for Kubernetes Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs). As with any release, we've also shipped standard dependency updates and bug fixes. This provider release includes the newest resources for Kubernetes v1.37.0, which was recently cut. So that in itself is very exciting! But the feature we're proudest of is that you can now extend the Kubernetes provider with any Kubernetes Custom Resource Definition of your choice by passing its manifest file to Pulumi, using the new --extension flag. We believe first-class CRD support in Pulumi is becoming more important than ever. For example, since the retirement of the ingress-nginx controller earlier this year, the recommended path for cluster ingress is Gateway API, which is maintained and shipped as CRDs. Generating a Pulumi SDK for CRDs In your Pulumi project root, run: pulumi package add kubernetes --extension "name=gateway-networking crd-manifest=gateway-api-crds.yaml" You will see the custom SDK appear in a new sdks/ folder, as well as a new parameterization reference in Pulumi.yaml. Single provider instance Your new CRD schema exists as an extension to your existing provider and will be managed under the same provider instance, allowing you to use a single provider configuration and kubeconfig. SDKs as dependencies Additionally, your code no longer needs to ship SDK files as part of the project. The provider extension is referenced in your project file and its SDK, like all dependencies, can be regenerated via pulumi install. You can choose to version the extension SDK, or continue to check the files into version control if you so desire. Full language support, including for YAML Kubernetes CRDs can now be provisioned with Pulumi in all supported languages. Unified CLI experience pulumi package add --extension extends your CRD schema into the Pulumi Kubernetes provider, using the same CLI as any ## SecretSpec 0.19: Moving and importing secrets between providers DevFeed: [SecretSpec 0.19: Moving and importing secrets between providers]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: domenkozar Published: 2026-08-11T23:15:09Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Announcements - NixOS Discourse]() Topics: [configuration](), [Self-hosted](), [servers]() Tags: [announcements](), [config](), [generate](), [json](), [moving](), [providers](), [release](), [secrets](), [self-hosted](), [servers](), [verify]() ### AI overview SecretSpec 0.19 introduces provider-specific secret storage layouts, safer imports with verification before deletion, value transformations, configuration stored alongside secrets, ephemeral values and runtime prompts, Passbolt support, and faster remote-provider operations. ### Source excerpt Hey all, secretspec 0.19 is out with highlights: Provider-specific storage layouts: map one application variable to each provider's native item, field, vault, or path. Safer imports: preflight every source and destination, verify copied values, and only then delete the source. Value transforms: decode Base64 or hexadecimal values and extract fields from JSON documents. Config in secrets: resolve committed, profile-specific configuration alongside provider-backed secrets. Ephemeral values and runtime prompts: generate or securely request values that should exist for only one invocation. Passbolt support: read and write secrets in self-hosted Passbolt servers. Faster remote providers: attach local caches directly to authoritative providers and batch 1Password field reads. Read the full release post: SecretSpec 0.19: Moving and importing secrets between providers | SecretSpec Disclaimer: LLMs have been used 1 post - 1 participant Read full topic ## Emulating Terraform on Pulumi's Engine DevFeed: [Emulating Terraform on Pulumi's Engine]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ian Wahbe Published: 2026-08-04T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Pulumi]() Topics: [Terraform](), [opentofu](), [terraform provider](), [configuration]() Tags: [engineering](), [hcl](), [modules](), [opentofu](), [protocol](), [providers](), [pulumi](), [terraform](), [terraform-provider](), [translation]() ### AI overview This article explains how Pulumi's HCL interpreter maps Terraform configuration, resources, providers, and modules onto the Pulumi engine. It reports that the implementation works with 96% of Pulumi's top Terraform modules and describes how Pulumi's terraform-provider relays between Pulumi and Terraform provider protocols. ### Source excerpt The core promise of Pulumi's HCL support is that you can bring your existing Terraform configuration and modules, and pulumi will run them. If it works in OpenTofu and doesn't work in Pulumi, we would like to fix that. Given that goal, our HCL interpreter needs to take HCL as input and emit instructions to the Pulumi engine that semantically match how tofu would interpret the same input. This is made harder by the fact that Pulumi and OpenTofu have fundamentally different engine semantics and provider ecosystems. This blog post will explore how we have implemented that mapping well enough to get 96%1 of our top Terraform modules working on Pulumi. We'll briefly walk through how Pulumi's HCL interpreter handles Terraform's resource semantics, providers, and modules. It will also call out where Pulumi's HCL support lets you do things that Terraform and OpenTofu will not allow. Providers Both Pulumi and Terraform have providers, but they don't have the same providers. While there are providers that Terraform does not have, Pulumi can always resolve a Terraform provider using Pulumi's confusingly named terraform-provider provider.2 This is the same provider that lets you consume Any Terraform Provider in another Pulumi program with pulumi package add terraform-provider .... The terraform-provider provider acts as a relay: it speaks Pulumi's protocol to the Pulumi engine, and speaks Terraform's provider protocol to the Terraform provider it stands up. Because Pulumi HCL needs to work with all Pulumi providers and because terraform-provider lets Pulumi HCL speak to Terraform providers via the Pulumi protocol, Pulumi HCL actually only speaks Pulumi protocols directly: flowchart LR subgraph n2Entry[" "] n2["terraform-provider"] end subgraph providerBox["Pulumi Provider"] direction TD n2Entry n3["Terraform Provider"] end n0["Pulumi HCL"] <--> n1["Pulumi Engine"] n1 <--> n2Entry n2 <--> n3 n2@{ shape: rect} n3@{ shape: rect} n0@{ shape: rect} n1@{ shape: rect} style n2Entry f ## How Passive Optical Networks (PON) Work DevFeed: [How Passive Optical Networks (PON) Work]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: j2sw Published: 2026-07-22T12:35:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Justin Wilson (j2sw)]() Topics: [Networks](), [gpon](), [Internet](), [Ethernet](), [gateway](), [Security](), [Deployment]() Tags: [ethernet](), [fiber](), [ftth](), [gateway](), [gpon](), [internet](), [internet-architecture](), [isp](), [networks](), [passive-optical-network](), [pon](), [providers](), [provisioning](), [router](), [security](), [xgs-pon]() ### AI overview This tutorial explains how Passive Optical Networks (PON) deliver residential fiber Internet. It describes the roles of the OLT, passive optical splitters, ONTs, and the customer router or gateway, including how providers share feeder fiber among subscribers and provision authorized ONTs. ### Source excerpt If you've spent any time looking into fiber Internet, you've probably run across terms like GPON, XGS-PON, OLT, and ONT. These are all parts of what's called a Passive Optical Network, or PON. Most residential fiber providers use PON because it lets them connect alot of homes without having to pull a separate fiber from ... Read more The post How Passive Optical Networks (PON) Work appeared first on Justin Wilson (j2sw). ## Automatic CA Certificate Import in Podman 6 DevFeed: [Automatic CA Certificate Import in Podman 6]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Mario Loriedo Published: 2026-07-08T09:26:23Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [blog.podman.io]() Topics: [podman](), [Containers](), [cross-platform](), [configuration](), [Go](), [Linux](), [macOS](), [Windows](), [Windows Subsystem for Linux]() Tags: [announcement](), [articles](), [certificates](), [community](), [configuration](), [containers](), [cross-platform](), [developers](), [enterprise](), [go](), [linux](), [macos](), [new-feature](), [podman](), [podman-machine](), [providers](), [qemu](), [security](), [windows](), [wsl]() ### AI overview Podman 6 introduces optional automatic import of trusted host CA certificates into Podman Machine guests. The feature synchronizes certificates on machine boot, helping containers access internal registries and web services without manual certificate export and injection. ### Source excerpt With the release of Podman 6.0, an improvement for enterprise users and developers behind corporate proxies is the new automatic import of host certificates for the Podman machine. ## The Maintainer of Last Resort DevFeed: [The Maintainer of Last Resort]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2026-06-22T00:00:00Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Chainguard: Unchained]() Topics: [Open Source](), [Maintainers](), [Vulnerabilities](), [Software](), [Cloud]() Tags: [chainguard-containers](), [chainguard-libraries](), [chainguard-open-source](), [emertioss](), [maintainers](), [open-source](), [open-source-maintainer](), [oss](), [providers](), [software](), [vulnerabilities]() ### AI overview Chainguard proposes a Maintainer of Last Resort as a neutral backstop for abandoned open source projects. The model would fork vulnerable packages, apply fixes, publish verifiable builds, and handle future vulnerability disclosures when upstream maintainers cannot respond in time. ### Source excerpt Chainguard proposes a Maintainer of Last Resort to patch abandoned open source projects, publish trusted builds, and keep critical software secure. ## Android Studio Quail 1 Patch 2 now available DevFeed: [Android Studio Quail 1 Patch 2 now available]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Android Studio Releaser (noreply@blogger.com) Published: 2026-06-16T16:56:06Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Android Studio Release Updates]() Topics: [Android Studio](), [Android Gradle Plugin](), [Release notes]() Tags: [android](), [android-gradle-plugin](), [android-studio](), [bug](), [env-file-security](), [gemini](), [providers](), [stable-channel]() ### AI overview Android Studio Quail 1 Patch 2 is available in the Stable channel. The update includes general fixes, including a correction for an issue where adding a local Gemini model provider opened the Gemini/Google Cloud configuration screen instead of the local model configuration. ### Source excerpt Android Studio Quail 1 Patch 2 is now available in the Stable channel. If you already have an Android Studio build on the Stable channel, you can get the update by clicking Help > Check for Updates (or Android Studio > Check for Updates on macOS). Otherwise, you can download it here. For information on new features and changes in Android Studio Quail 1, see the Android Studio release notes. For details of bugs fixed in each previous release of Android Studio Quail 1, see closed issues. General fixes and features Below is a list of general fixes in Android Studio Quail 1 Patch 2 and Android Gradle Plugin . These are a result of your bug reports, which help us to make Android Studio better. If you encounter a problem, let us know by reporting a bug. You can also vote for an existing issue to indicate that it also affects you. Fixed Issues Gemini Issue #519243465 Model Providers 'Add > Local Provider' opens Gemini/Google Cloud configuration screen instead of local model configuration ## BNPL for SaaS: Should You Offer Buy-Now-Pay-Later on Subscriptions? DevFeed: [BNPL for SaaS: Should You Offer Buy-Now-Pay-Later on Subscriptions?]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-05-11T00:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Software as a service](), [Software]() Tags: [australia](), [b2b](), [payments](), [pricing](), [providers](), [saas](), [subscriptions](), [uk](), [us]() ### AI overview This guide examines when buy-now-pay-later can fit SaaS pricing, including annual contract installments and high-ticket plans. It explains that BNPL providers pay merchants upfront, while recurring monthly SaaS subscriptions generally are not supported because BNPL is designed for one-time payments. ### Source excerpt Where BNPL fits in SaaS pricing: annual contract installments, high-ticket plans, and Klarna and Afterpay limits. Plus the subscription gap most teams miss. ## Embedded Finance Solutions: How SaaS Platforms Add Banking Features Without a License DevFeed: [Embedded Finance Solutions: How SaaS Platforms Add Banking Features Without a License]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-04-30T00:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Software as a service](), [Transactions]() Tags: [architectures](), [compliance](), [embedded-finance](), [financial-services](), [models](), [payments](), [providers](), [saas]() ### AI overview This guide explains how SaaS platforms can embed payments, payouts, lending, cards, and treasury features by partnering with regulated providers instead of becoming regulated financial institutions. It covers available features, technical architectures, legal responsibilities, partners, and revenue-sharing models. ### Source excerpt How SaaS platforms add embedded finance features (payments, payouts, lending, cards) without becoming a regulated bank. Architectures, partners, and revenue models. ## Ask Your Survey Anything: Building AI Analysis Pipelines with Airflow 3 DevFeed: [Ask Your Survey Anything: Building AI Analysis Pipelines with Airflow 3]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Apache Airflow Published: 2026-04-15T00:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Apache Airflow Blog]() Topics: [airflow](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Large Language Model](), [SQL](), [CSV](), [data]() Tags: [ai](), [airflow](), [apache-airflow](), [automated](), [community](), [configuration](), [csv](), [executor](), [llm](), [pipelines](), [providers](), [scheduled](), [sql](), [tutorial]() ### AI overview A tutorial showing how to build interactive and scheduled AI analysis pipelines with Airflow 3. The pipelines use survey CSV data, generate and run SQL queries, validate schemas, and either request human approval or email results automatically. ### Source excerpt The 2025 Airflow Community Survey collected responses from nearly 6,000 practitioners across 168 questions. You can open a spreadsheet and filter, or write SQL by hand. But what if you could just ask a question and have Airflow figure out the query, run it, and bring the result back for your approval? This post builds two pipelines that do exactly that, using the apache-airflow-providers-common-ai provider for Airflow 3. The first pipeline is interactive: a human reviews the question before it reaches the LLM and approves the result before the DAG finishes. The second is scheduled: it downloads fresh survey data, validates the schema, runs the query unattended, and emails the result. If you haven't seen the common.ai provider overview yet, start there for a tour of all the operators. This post goes deep on a concrete end-to-end example. Two Pipelines, One Example File Both DAGs live in example_llm_survey_analysis.py and share the same schema context and datasource configuration. example_llm_survey_interactive: trigger manually, review at both ends: prompt_confirmation -> generate_sql -> run_query -> extract_data -> result_confirmation (HITLEntryOperator) (LLMSQLQuery) (Analytics) (@task) (ApprovalOperator) example_llm_survey_scheduled: runs @monthly, no human in the loop: download_survey -> prepare_csv -> check_schema -> generate_sql -> run_query -> extract_data -> send_result (HttpOperator) (@task) (LLMSchema (LLMSQLQuery) (Analytics) (@task) (@task / Email) Compare) The Data The Airflow Community Survey 2025 CSV has 5,856 rows and 168 columns covering everything from Airflow version and executor type to cloud provider, company size, and AI tool usage. A few highlights from the data: 3,320 respondents identify as Data Engineers 2,032 use AWS as their primary cloud provider for Airflow 1,445 are already running Airflow 3 1,351 say they often use AI tools to write Airflow code Those last two numbers together are part of why this example exists: the people most likely to use th ## Best Payment Orchestration Platforms in 2026 DevFeed: [Best Payment Orchestration Platforms in 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-04-07T00:00:00Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Orchestration](), [Software as a service](), [AI Agent](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Automation]() Tags: [2026](), [agent](), [ai](), [ai-agent](), [billing](), [compare](), [orchestration](), [payment](), [payments](), [platforms](), [providers](), [retry](), [routing](), [saas](), [transactions]() ### AI overview A comparison of payment orchestration platforms for SaaS companies in 2026. It groups platforms into AI-native all-in-one stacks, pure-play routing layers, and self-hosted open-source options, comparing their approaches to payment routing, retries, billing, tax compliance, and Merchant of Record coverage. ### Source excerpt Compare the top payment orchestration platforms for SaaS in 2026. See how AI-powered tools like Sentra are changing payment routing, retry logic, and billing automation. ## 7 Best FastSpring Alternatives in 2026 for SaaS and Software Sellers DevFeed: [7 Best FastSpring Alternatives in 2026 for SaaS and Software Sellers]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-03-25T00:00:00Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Software as a service](), [Software](), [migration]() Tags: [2025](), [2026](), [alternatives](), [compare](), [global-payments](), [legacy](), [merchant-of-record](), [migration](), [pricing](), [providers](), [saas](), [software](), [teams]() ### AI overview A comparison of seven FastSpring alternatives for SaaS and software sellers: Dodo Payments, Paddle, Cleverbridge, PayPro Global, Lemon Squeezy, 2Checkout (Verifone), and Stripe with Managed Payments. It evaluates pricing transparency, implementation speed, procurement friction, usage billing, and Merchant of Record coverage, and notes that Digital River is no longer operating in this market. ### Source excerpt Compare seven FastSpring alternatives with verified pricing, Merchant of Record coverage, and migration criteria for software and SaaS teams, including which legacy providers are no longer operating. ## Digital River Alternatives: 7 Better Options for SaaS in 2026 DevFeed: [Digital River Alternatives: 7 Better Options for SaaS in 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-03-25T00:00:00Z Content type: comparison Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Software as a service](), [migration](), [Software](), [stripe]() Tags: [2026](), [alternatives](), [billing](), [compare](), [complexity](), [compliance](), [cost](), [cross-border](), [digital](), [ecommerce](), [financial](), [global](), [global-payments](), [guide](), [legal](), [merchant-of-record](), [migration](), [payments](), [pricing](), [providers](), [saas]() ### AI overview A comparison guide to seven alternatives to Digital River after it shut down its Merchant of Record business in January 2025. It covers operating replacements, pricing, Merchant of Record coverage, and migration considerations for SaaS and digital-product teams. ### Source excerpt Digital River shut down its Merchant of Record business in January 2025. Compare seven operating replacements with verified pricing, MoR coverage, and migration guidance for SaaS and digital product teams. ## Merchant of Record for SaaS: Why It Matters and How to Choose the Right Partner DevFeed: [Merchant of Record for SaaS: Why It Matters and How to Choose the Right Partner]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-03-25T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Software as a service](), [Transactions]() Tags: [billing](), [chargebacks](), [compliance](), [global](), [growth](), [merchant-of-record](), [payment](), [providers](), [saas](), [tax]() ### AI overview This article explains why SaaS companies adopt a Merchant of Record as they expand globally. It describes how an MoR can take on legal seller responsibility and support tax, compliance, invoicing, fraud, disputes, payment methods, and payouts, then outlines considerations for evaluating providers. ### Source excerpt Learn why SaaS companies use a Merchant of Record, what capabilities matter most, and how to evaluate providers for tax, compliance, billing, and global growth. ## PaaS + IaaS: Heroku and AWS for Cloud-Native Enterprise Agility DevFeed: [PaaS + IaaS: Heroku and AWS for Cloud-Native Enterprise Agility]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Gillian Gual Hinkle Published: 2025-12-04T19:50:28Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Heroku]() Topics: [Heroku](), [Amazon Web Services](), [Platform as a Service (PaaS)](), [Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)](), [Cloud](), [Development]() Tags: [applications](), [aws](), [cloud](), [cloud-infrastructure](), [cloud-native](), [deploy](), [development](), [engineering](), [heroku](), [heroku-enterprise](), [infrastructure-as-a-service-iaas](), [maintenance](), [platform-as-a-service-paas](), [providers](), [scale](), [services](), [velocity]() ### AI overview The article explains how enterprises can combine Heroku's managed PaaS with AWS infrastructure to build and operate cloud-native applications. It highlights reduced operational burden, greater developer focus, and a Salesforce example involving applications used by more than 76,000 employees. ### Source excerpt For modern enterprises building cloud-native applications, success hinges on achieving maximum development velocity at every scale. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) providers like AWS provide hundreds of services with the unmatched reliability and scale needed for enterprise infrastructure, but they can require significant effort and expertise for organizations to be effective and efficient. To achieve [...] The post PaaS + IaaS: Heroku and AWS for Cloud-Native Enterprise Agility appeared first on Heroku. ## How Pump uses ClickHouse Cloud to bring cloud costs into focus DevFeed: [How Pump uses ClickHouse Cloud to bring cloud costs into focus]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: ClickHouse Published: 2025-12-02T15:36:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [ClickHouse Blog]() Topics: [clickhouse](), [finops](), [Cloud](), [Amazon Web Services](), [data](), [Database]() Tags: [2025](), [architecture](), [aws](), [clickhouse](), [cloud](), [cost](), [data](), [database](), [finops](), [pipeline](), [providers](), [visibility]() ### AI overview Pump built Pump View on ClickHouse Cloud to provide detailed visibility into cloud spending. The platform ingests and analyzes billions of billing records from providers such as AWS and GCP, enabling teams to break costs down by region, usage type, team, and custom tags. ### Source excerpt Pump built their cloud cost visibility platform on ClickHouse Cloud to ingest and analyze 5 billion billing records daily, solving challenges that would have been impossible with Postgres. ## ClickPipes for Postgres now supports failover replication slots DevFeed: [ClickPipes for Postgres now supports failover replication slots]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Kevin Biju Kizhake Kanichery Published: 2025-11-11T14:09:46Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [ClickHouse Blog]() Topics: [Replication](), [Database](), [Availability](), [Databases](), [configuration](), [Server](), [Amazon Web Services](), [Google]() Tags: [aws](), [configuration](), [database](), [failover](), [google](), [high-availability](), [postgres](), [providers](), [replication]() ### AI overview ClickPipes for Postgres adds an option to create logical replication slots with failover enabled. The feature uses Postgres 17 logical replication failover to synchronize slots to standby servers, allowing logical decoding and CDC pipelines to resume after a standby is promoted. ### Source excerpt Learn about how failover-ready replication slots keep Postgres CDC pipelines running without interruption. [Next page]()