# QC

Published articles for QC.

This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles.

## How Zapier transformed core marketing processes with ChatGPT Work

DevFeed: [How Zapier transformed core marketing processes with ChatGPT Work](<https://devfeed.tech/articles/how-zapier-transformed-core-marketing-processes-with-chatgpt-work-6724.md>)

Original publisher: [Read original article](<https://openai.com/index/zapier>)

Published: 2026-08-10T00:00:00Z

Content type: article

Language: en

Sources: [OpenAI News](<https://devfeed.tech/sources/openai-news.md>)

Topics: [ChatGPT](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/chatgpt.md>), [Processes](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/processes.md>), [dashboards](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/dashboards.md>), [Optimization](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/optimization.md>)

Tags: [building](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/building.md>), [chatgpt](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/chatgpt.md>), [executive](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/executive.md>), [optimization](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/optimization.md>), [processes](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/processes.md>), [qa](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/qa.md>), [qc](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/qc.md>), [quality-assurance](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/quality-assurance.md>), [quality-control](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/quality-control.md>), [sales](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/sales.md>), [work](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/work.md>)

### AI overview

Zapier's enterprise marketing team uses ChatGPT Work to automate lead-funnel QA/QC, identify and fix lead problems, build campaign assets, and report recurring pipeline issues. The system reduces manual effort, accelerates campaign execution, and helps generate pipeline value for sales.

### Source excerpt

The enterprise marketing team at Zapier uses ChatGPT Work to reduce the number of drop-offs in its lead funnel, build campaign assets, and automate reporting.

## Dogfooding vs. QA vs. User Research

DevFeed: [Dogfooding vs. QA vs. User Research](<https://devfeed.tech/articles/dogfooding-vs-qa-vs-user-research-9034.md>)

Original publisher: [Read original article](<https://www.nngroup.com/articles/dogfooding/>)

Author: Therese Fessenden

Published: 2026-08-07T17:00:00Z

Content type: article

Language: en

Sources: [NN/g latest articles and announcements](<https://devfeed.tech/sources/nn-g-latest-articles-and-announcements.md>)

Topics: [dogfooding](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/dogfooding.md>), [FIRST](<https://devfeed.tech/topics/first.md>)

Tags: [article](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/article.md>), [bugs](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/bugs.md>), [development](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/development.md>), [dogfooding](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/dogfooding.md>), [qa](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/qa.md>), [qc](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/qc.md>), [quality-assurance](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/quality-assurance.md>), [quality-control](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/quality-control.md>), [user-research](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/user-research.md>), [user-testing](<https://devfeed.tech/tags/user-testing.md>)

### AI overview

Dogfooding--using a company's own products internally--can reveal bugs, broken flows, crashes, and missing features while building empathy and shared ownership. The article explains that it complements but cannot replace user research, because insiders understand the product too well to represent real users. It also distinguishes genuine dogfooding from performative displays of loyalty.

### Source excerpt

Dogfooding, or using your own products internally, helps catch bugs, but it can't replace user research: your team knows too much to represent real users.