# scope Published articles for scope. This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles. ## MCP authorization: governing tool calls beyond OAuth DevFeed: [MCP authorization: governing tool calls beyond OAuth]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: WorkOS Published: 2026-09-15T15:04:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [WorkOS Blog]() Topics: [Model Context Protocol](), [Authorization](), [MCP OAuth](), [MCP Server](), [OAuth]() Tags: [authorization](), [mcp](), [mcp-server](), [oauth](), [permissions](), [policy](), [scope](), [scopes]() ### AI overview This guide explains why OAuth scopes alone cannot govern the content and destination of MCP tool calls. It presents server- or gateway-side policy enforcement before execution, including request-content inspection, approval handling, and testing for data leakage. ### Source excerpt Secure MCP tool calls beyond OAuth scopes. Learn where to enforce tool permissions, check request content, and test for data leakage with Airlock. ## Give every teammate and agent the right level of access to your Workers DevFeed: [Give every teammate and agent the right level of access to your Workers]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Visal In Published: 2026-09-15T13:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Cloudflare Blog]() Topics: [Workers](), [Authorization](), [Developer Platform](), [debug]() Tags: [agent](), [api](), [cloudflare](), [debug](), [developer](), [developer-platform](), [developers](), [identity](), [least-privilege](), [logs](), [metrics](), [monitor](), [product-news](), [scope](), [security](), [traces](), [workers](), [workflows]() ### AI overview Cloudflare now lets teams scope access to individual Workers and assign narrower Developer Platform roles. Teammates, CI tokens, and agents can receive only the permissions needed to debug, deploy, or monitor safely. ### Source excerpt You can now scope access to individual Workers and assign narrower Developer Platform roles, so teammates, CI tokens, and agents get only the access they need to debug, deploy, or monitor safely. ## MCP: Scope step-up is not authentication step-up DevFeed: [MCP: Scope step-up is not authentication step-up]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: WorkOS Published: 2026-09-01T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [WorkOS Blog]() Topics: [Model Context Protocol](), [Authentication](), [Authorization](), [MCP Server]() Tags: [authentication](), [authorization](), [browser](), [compliance](), [delivery](), [mcp](), [mcp-server](), [model-context-protocol](), [permission](), [protocol](), [scope](), [token]() ### AI overview The article distinguishes MCP scope step-up from authentication step-up. MCP's current authorization flow addresses insufficient permission by obtaining broader scopes, but it does not standardize verifying whether a human recently authenticated or is still present. It recommends binding out-of-band approval to the user and exact operation until this changes. ### Source excerpt MCP standardized how an agent asks for more permission. It has no vocabulary yet for asking whether the human behind the token is still there. ## Vercel Security Dashboard is now generally available DevFeed: [Vercel Security Dashboard is now generally available]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Jathin Singaraju Published: 2026-08-26T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [dashboards](), [Security](), [Vercel](), [Command-line interface](), [OpenID connect (OIDC)](), [Terminal](), [ci](), [CSV](), [JSON]() Tags: [ci](), [cli](), [coding-agents](), [documentation](), [git](), [json](), [oidc](), [report](), [scope](), [security](), [terminal](), [ui](), [vercel]() ### AI overview Vercel Security Dashboard is generally available on all plans. It centralizes security findings across accounts and projects, supports risk-ordered remediation and CSV export, and provides equivalent checks through the Vercel CLI. Agents can inspect findings, apply supported fixes, and re-check results, with JSON output available in CI and other non-interactive environments. ### Source excerpt The Vercel Security Dashboard is now generally available on all plans, giving you one place to see your security posture across every account and project. You can access the Security Dashboard in the UI or run vercel security check in the Vercel CLI. As teams grow and coding agents make it faster to spin up projects, small misconfigurations add up quietly. The Security Dashboard automatically flags issues like: Team members without 2FA Long-lived credentials that can be replaced with OIDC Public preview deployments Non-sensitive and stale environment variables The Security Dashboard UI Misconfigurations are ordered by risk with the most severe first, and each finding links to the settings that fix them. Findings that are just noise for your team can also be muted, and all results can be exported to a CSV file for triage or reporting. The Security Dashboard CLI You can also run the same checks in your terminal through the new Vercel CLI vercel security check command, allowing your agents to work through the findings for you. An agent using vercel security check --findings can read what failed, apply the fix and re-check to confirm. Fixes an agent can apply include: Turning on Git fork protection Marking an environment variable as sensitive Replacing a static credential with OIDC federation You can also scope the check to one project with --project when you want a narrow change set. In CI or any other non-interactive environment, the command writes the report to stdout as JSON automatically, giving agents structured output without extra flags. Get started by running your first scan from the Security Dashboard, and learn more in the Security Dashboard documentation. Read more ## Private pages: build your own views, no admin required DevFeed: [Private pages: build your own views, no admin required]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Naama Ben Oliel Ronen Published: 2026-08-10T11:34:51Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Developer Experience & Platform Engineering Blog | Port]() Topics: [dashboards](), [Authorization](), [Deployment](), [API]() Tags: [collaboration](), [deployment](), [gui](), [scope]() ### AI overview Port introduces Private Pages, allowing authorized members to build personal dashboards and views from data they can already access. Pages are private by default, can be shared with selected users or teams, and can be promoted to organization-wide visibility only by an admin. ### Source excerpt Port users can now build their own views on top of the data they already have access to. ## Agentic Engineering 2.0 Explained: The Future of AI Engineering DevFeed: [Agentic Engineering 2.0 Explained: The Future of AI Engineering]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Zohar Einy Published: 2026-08-10T11:32:21Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Developer Experience & Platform Engineering Blog | Port]() Topics: [AI Engineering](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Incident response](), [Graphs](), [Code review]() Tags: [agentic](), [agents](), [ai-agents](), [ai-engineering](), [autonomous](), [building](), [development](), [incident](), [incident-response](), [latency](), [scope](), [workflow]() ### AI overview The article distinguishes two generations of agentic engineering. Version 1.0 uses AI agents in deterministic workflows with predefined stages, prompts, responsibilities, and hand-offs. Version 2.0 gives an agent a goal and lets it determine the path, with the foundation built during the first generation enabling that transition. A self-healing incident workflow illustrates the contrast. ### Source excerpt Agentic engineering 1.0 wires the path; 2.0 hands agents a goal. See how the shift works and what foundation to build in 2026. ## Call for testing: Restricting trait implementability and field mutability DevFeed: [Call for testing: Restricting trait implementability and field mutability]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ryosuke Yamano Published: 2026-08-10T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Inside Rust Blog]() Topics: [Rust](), [Testing](), [Code]() Tags: [compiler](), [implementation](), [rust](), [scope](), [sealed](), [testing]() ### AI overview Rust RFC 3323, "Restrictions," is ready for testing on nightly Rust. It introduces impl_restriction for limiting where traits may be implemented and mut_restriction for limiting where fields may be mutated. ### Source excerpt We are excited to announce that RFC 3323 "Restrictions" is ready for testing on nightly Rust. In this post, we will briefly describe the features. If you are already familiar with them, you can skip ahead to the How can I help? section. The RFC is split into two features: impl_restriction and mut_restriction. What is impl_restriction? The impl_restriction feature allows explicit restriction of the scope in which a trait may be implemented. For example, consider a trait Foo with a method that we want users to be able to call, while preventing downstream crates from providing their own implementations. With this feature, we can write: #![feature(impl_restriction)] pub impl(crate) trait Foo { fn method(); } impl Foo for usize { fn method() {} } The impl(crate) restriction prevents Foo from being implemented outside the current crate. As with pub, other paths can also be specified, such as impl(super) or impl(in path). Without this feature, this use case is typically handled using the sealed trait pattern, which is described in the Rust API Guidelines. In short, this pattern defines a public Sealed trait inside a private module and makes it a supertrait of Foo. Because downstream crates cannot name Sealed, they cannot implement Foo. pub trait Foo: private::Sealed { fn method(); } // Implement `Foo` for selected types. impl Foo for usize { fn method() {} } mod private { pub trait Sealed {} // Implement `Sealed` for those same types, but no others. impl Sealed for usize {} } However, this pattern requires defining an additional Sealed trait. The new impl_restriction feature provides a more direct and concise way to express the same restriction. The feature also allows the compiler to produce a more direct error message when an implementation is attempted outside the permitted scope. For example, the following code: #![feature(impl_restriction)] pub mod foo { pub mod bar { pub(crate) impl(super) trait Foo {} } // `Foo` may be implemented here. impl bar::Foo for i8 {} } // ## Promotions are Proactive: The 3P Framework for Pitching Your Next Level DevFeed: [Promotions are Proactive: The 3P Framework for Pitching Your Next Level]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: hello@ankit-rana.com Published: 2026-08-02T00:00:00Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Ankit Rana | Mechanical Sympathy]() Topics: [Back end](), [Latency](), [Caching](), [connection pool](), [migration]() Tags: [backend](), [caching](), [career](), [career-growth](), [connection-pool](), [engineering](), [latency](), [leadership](), [migration](), [scope](), [system-design]() ### AI overview This article presents the 3P framework--Problem, Proof, and Proactive pitch--for making an engineer's promotion case legible before review. It argues that promotion reflects the scope or blast radius of decisions, supported by system evidence and an explicit pitch. ### Source excerpt Promotion committees do not promote effort, they promote scope, and scope has to be legible before the vote rather than explained after it fails. Strip the leveling-guide language and the question is blast radius: a mid-level engineer's bad call fails one deploy unit, a senior's saturates a pool at 2 AM across teams. The 3P framework makes that visible: Problem at org scale, Proof in system metrics, and a Proactive pitch. ## Vercel Passport is now generally available DevFeed: [Vercel Passport is now generally available]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Yanick Bélanger Published: 2026-07-31T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [Vercel](), [Authentication](), [Entra ID](), [OpenID connect (OIDC)](), [JSON Web Tokens](), [Back end](), [Deployment]() Tags: [authentication](), [backend](), [entra-id](), [jwks](), [oidc](), [okta](), [payload](), [scope](), [vercel](), [verify]() ### AI overview Vercel Passport is generally available for protecting Vercel deployments with Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, or another OIDC provider. It provides verified visitor identity to application code, supports group-based authorization, enables token verification in downstream services, and records successful authentications in activity and audit logs. ### Source excerpt Vercel Passport is now generally available. Passport allows you to protect your Vercel deployments with your own identity provider. Visitors authenticate through Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, or any OIDC provider before viewing a protected deployment, and Vercel forwards a signed identity token to the deployment so application code can build on who the visitor is. Read visitor identity in application code The getIdentity() helper in @vercel/passport reads the Vercel request context and returns the authenticated visitor. Vercel strips client-supplied values for the x-vercel-oidc-passport-token header and injects the verified token after Passport validates the session, so the identity your code receives is already verified. The subject field is a stable identifier for the visitor, scoped to your team and the Vercel Connect application that links Passport to your identity provider, and externalSubject is the visitor's ID in the provider itself. The helper returns null only when a request arrives without a Passport session, because unauthenticated browser visitors are redirected to the identity provider before they ever reach your code. In local development, getIdentity() returns a configurable development identity, so the same code path works without a real identity provider. Authorize with groups from your identity provider The signed Passport token can now carry additional identity claims from your provider, such as group membership. Request the groups scope and allowlist the claim in the Vercel Connect application that Passport uses, then read it from the identity payload: The additional identity scopes documentation covers provider configuration, including a full Okta walkthrough. Verify identity in downstream services Forward the Passport token from your application to another backend as a bearer token and verify it there with verifyIdentity(), available in @vercel/passport 1.0.0 and later. The helper checks the token signature, the Passport claims, and that the token ## AI Coding Tip 029 - Stop Using One Model for Everything DevFeed: [AI Coding Tip 029 - Stop Using One Model for Everything]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Maxi Contieri Published: 2026-07-26T15:08:02Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Maximiliano Contieri - Software Design]() Topics: [coding](), [ai-coding](), [Testing](), [Test-driven development]() Tags: [ai-coding](), [coding](), [cost](), [review](), [scope](), [tdd](), [testing]() ### AI overview The article argues that AI coding pipelines should assign different models to planning, coding, reviewing, and testing. It recommends using fresh context, automated test harnesses, independent reviewers, model rotation, and separate models for TDD stages to reduce shared blind spots, vendor dependence, and missed edge cases. ### Source excerpt TL;DR: Assign a different model to each pipeline stage since none excels at planning, coding, reviewing, and testing alike. Common Mistake ❌ You open one chat with your favorite model and ask it to p ## GitHub tools are now an installable eve extension DevFeed: [GitHub tools are now an installable eve extension]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ben Sabic Published: 2026-07-23T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [GitHub](), [Extension](), [Authorization](), [Code review](), [Pull Request](), [Vercel]() Tags: [agent](), [auth](), [code](), [config](), [extension](), [github](), [review](), [scope](), [tokens](), [tool](), [tools](), [upgrade](), [vercel]() ### AI overview Vercel introduces GitHub tools as an installable eve extension. The package registers a code-review toolset with connector-backed authentication, scoped short-lived GitHub tokens, configurable presets, approval rules, namespacing, versioning, and import-time schema validation. ### Source excerpt You can now add GitHub tools to your eve agent as an extension. Add the package, drop one file in agent/extensions/, and your agent gets every tool with Vercel Connect auth, presets, and approval rules built in. Install @github-tools/eve-extension: Then register it from a file in agent/extensions/: Connector-backed auth: Pass a Vercel Connect connector and the extension mints short-lived, scoped GitHub tokens at runtime. Presets scope the toolset: code-review, issue-triage, repo-explorer, ci-ops, and maintainer map to Connect scopes automatically, so tokens carry only the permissions the tools need. Approval rules travel with the config: Every write tool requires approval by default. Gate individual tools with always, once, or an input-dependent predicate, like approving comments only outside your own org. Namespaced and versioned: The filename sets the namespace, so tools run in the agent as github__addPullRequestComment. Upgrade the package to pick up new tools and fixes, and the config schema is validated on import. Get started by creating a GitHub connector and reading the documentation. Read more ## Charting your team's knowledge & skills map DevFeed: [Charting your team's knowledge & skills map]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Anton Zaides Published: 2026-07-21T06:01:00Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Manager.dev]() Topics: [Graphs](), [GitHub](), [Pull Request](), [Claude](), [systems](), [Open Source]() Tags: [claude](), [collaboration](), [github](), [graph](), [process](), [scope](), [soft-skills]() ### AI overview An engineering manager describes using Unblocked's Social Graph Builder to visualize collaboration and codebase expertise from GitHub pull request history, then explains a spreadsheet-based method for mapping a team's product knowledge, technology skills, soft skills, and non-engineering skills. The article argues that expert knowledge is important for evaluating AI-assisted work with Claude and avoiding harmful implementations in unfamiliar domains. ### Source excerpt If you rebuilt your team again today, knowing what you know now, would it look the same? ## What Interviewers Listen for in Behavioral Interviews DevFeed: [What Interviewers Listen for in Behavioral Interviews]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Stephane Moreau Published: 2026-07-19T11:12:27Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Blog for Engineering Managers]() Topics: [Job](), [incident](), [service](), [connection pool]() Tags: [connection-pool](), [engineering](), [guide](), [how-to](), [incident](), [influence](), [interviews](), [junior](), [scope](), [service](), [teams]() ### AI overview This article explains how interviewers assess behavioral answers, emphasizing the scope of ambiguity, influence across teams, trade-offs, and whether candidates actively discovered problems. It argues that these signals can distinguish mid-level engineers from Staff-level engineers before the stated outcome. ### Source excerpt What I'm actually listening for when you answer. ## Idempotency Keys in Payment APIs: Prevent Double Charges DevFeed: [Idempotency Keys in Payment APIs: Prevent Double Charges]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-07-12T00:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [API](), [SDKs]() Tags: [api](), [apis](), [bugs](), [chargebacks](), [engineering](), [generate](), [how-to](), [learn](), [payment](), [payments](), [scope]() ### AI overview This tutorial explains how idempotency keys prevent duplicate charges in payment APIs by making retries of the same logical operation safe. It covers ambiguous failures, key generation and scope, retry patterns, and implementation details such as time-to-live. ### Source excerpt How idempotency keys stop duplicate charges in payment APIs. Learn what idempotency means, how keys work, retry-safe patterns, key scope and TTL, and how to implement them correctly. ## Defer in Swift explained with Code Examples DevFeed: [Defer in Swift explained with Code Examples]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Antoine van der Lee Published: 2026-07-06T12:51:59Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [SwiftLee]() Topics: [Swift](), [Code](), [async/await](), [Concurrency]() Tags: [code](), [concurrency](), [defer](), [examples](), [leaving](), [scope](), [swift]() ### AI overview This tutorial explains Swift's defer statement, which runs code when control leaves its scope. It covers reverse execution order for multiple defer statements, using defer for resource cleanup, and Swift 6.4 support for awaiting asynchronous cleanup in defer bodies. ### Source excerpt Although the defer keyword was already introduced in Swift 2.0, it's still quite uncommon to use it in projects. Its usage can be hard to understand, but using it can improve your code a lot in some places. The most common use case seen around is opening and closing a context within a scope. Starting ... -> The post Defer in Swift explained with Code Examples appeared first on SwiftLee. ## From Build to Adoption: A Playbook for Driving Platform Migration DevFeed: [From Build to Adoption: A Playbook for Driving Platform Migration]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Astha Purohit Published: 2026-06-02T00:21:44Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Walmart Global Tech]() Topics: [Platform Engineering](), [migration](), [consistency]() Tags: [cost](), [migration](), [platform](), [platform-engineering](), [product-management](), [scope](), [teams]() ### AI overview This article shares lessons from 18 months of building an internal platform and driving tenant adoption. It explains why migration often progresses slowly despite a successful launch, because tenant teams face engineering costs, regression risk, calendar pressure, and competing priorities. It presents platform adoption as a distinct challenge from platform delivery. ### Source excerpt What 18 months of building an internal platform -- and driving tenant adoption -- have taught me. The common mistakes, and six phases for doing it right. The strange quiet after launch Six months after we built and launched an internal platform, I thought adoption would be easy. The reality couldn't have been more different. Adoption often takes longer than expected because tenant teams already have working systems, and migration carries real cost. The new system is working. The integration guide exists. The kickoff meetings have happened. And yet the pace of migration is slower than expected. Building a platform has a kind of urgency. There are sprints, demos, design reviews, exec readouts, and finally a launch announcement. Architecture diagrams get refined each week. A go-live date appears on a roadmap, and everyone sprints toward it. Then the platform ships, and the real work starts. I've spent the last 18 months building and launching an internal platform at Walmart and have been leading its tenant onboarding. This is a piece about what I've learned -- including the mistakes -- about platform adoption. AI Generated ImageThe most expensive assumption in platform engineering: "If we build it, they will come." It is comforting because it makes adoption someone else's problem. The platform team builds; the tenant teams choose. We tell ourselves that if the platform is good enough, the choice will be easy. But the tenant team already has a working system. It is integrated, instrumented, and understood. It carries years of bug fixes and accumulated edge cases. When tenant teams are asked to migrate, it feels like taking on a tax -- engineering effort, regression risk, calendar pressure -- in exchange for a benefit that mostly accrues down the road, while pulling engineering bandwidth away from higher-priority work today. Yes, there are real benefits: consistency across the company, a lower long-term cost of ownership, shared capabilities that scale across teams, and capabi ## Miasma supply chain attack: malicious code found in @redhat-cloud-services npm packages DevFeed: [Miasma supply chain attack: malicious code found in @redhat-cloud-services npm packages]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Brian Clark Published: 2026-06-01T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Blog RSS Feed | Snyk]() Topics: [Malware](), [npm packages](), [redhat](), [incident](), [GitHub](), [OpenID connect (OIDC)](), [API](), [React](), [Cloud]() Tags: [api](), [article](), [awareness](), [ci-cd](), [cloud-security](), [developer](), [devops](), [devsecops](), [enablement](), [github](), [incident](), [interest](), [npm-packages](), [oidc](), [payload](), [react](), [redhat](), [sbom](), [scm](), [scope](), [secrets](), [security](), [snyk-open-source](), [snyk-security-intel](), [supply-chain](), [supply-chain-security](), [tech](), [vulnerability-insights]() ### AI overview The Miasma supply chain attack compromised at least 32 @redhat-cloud-services npm package releases used by the Red Hat Hybrid Cloud Console. The malicious installation script steals developer and cloud credentials, attempts to spread through packages victims can publish, and may expose secrets on affected workstations and CI runners. ### Source excerpt A supply chain worm dubbed Miasma has been found in dozens of @redhat-cloud-services npm releases. The malicious preinstall hook steals credentials, probes cloud identities, and can republish other packages. ## Raw Card APIs and PCI Compliance: A SaaS Reality Check DevFeed: [Raw Card APIs and PCI Compliance: A SaaS Reality Check]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-05-16T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Software as a service](), [Security](), [API]() Tags: [apis](), [card](), [checkout](), [compliance](), [payment](), [saas](), [scope](), [security]() ### AI overview This article explains how raw card APIs give SaaS products greater control over payment flows while significantly expanding PCI compliance scope, engineering responsibilities, and audit costs. It compares raw card handling with hosted or embedded payment forms and identifies integration scenarios where the trade-off may be justified. ### Source excerpt Raw card APIs give you full control over the payment form but expand PCI scope dramatically. When the trade off makes sense and when it absolutely does not. ## Inline Checkout vs Hosted Checkout: A SaaS Decision Guide DevFeed: [Inline Checkout vs Hosted Checkout: A SaaS Decision Guide]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-05-15T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Software as a service](), [User Experience](), [API]() Tags: [api](), [checkout](), [compare](), [conversion](), [embedded](), [guide](), [integration](), [saas](), [scope](), [user-experience](), [vs]() ### AI overview A guide for SaaS, AI, and digital product teams choosing between inline and hosted checkout. It compares user experience, branding control, PCI compliance scope, tokenization, and integration effort, and explains when hosted checkout is preferable. ### Source excerpt Inline and hosted checkout solve different problems. Compare conversion, branding, PCI scope, and integration cost before choosing. ## PCI Compliance Checklist for SaaS and Digital Products DevFeed: [PCI Compliance Checklist for SaaS and Digital Products]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-04-15T00:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Software as a service](), [Security](), [network security](), [Firewall](), [data](), [Encryption](), [TLS (Transport Layer Security)](), [Authorization]() Tags: [compliance](), [configuration](), [cryptography](), [data-protection](), [digital-products](), [firewall](), [merchant-of-record](), [network-security](), [requirements](), [saas](), [scope](), [security](), [tls]() ### AI overview A practical PCI DSS compliance checklist for SaaS companies and digital product sellers. It explains how checkout architecture determines SAQ requirements, how hosted checkouts and merchant-of-record services can reduce compliance scope, and which network security, data protection, and access-control practices are required. ### Source excerpt A practical PCI compliance checklist for SaaS companies selling digital products. Understand SAQ types, scope reduction, and how a merchant of record simplifies compliance. ## PCI DSS Compliance: What Digital Businesses Need to Know DevFeed: [PCI DSS Compliance: What Digital Businesses Need to Know]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-04-15T00:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Security](), [Social engineering](), [Network Segmentation](), [TLS (Transport Layer Security)](), [vulnerability management](), [SIEM, Security](), [Software as a service](), [tokenization]() Tags: [compliance](), [digital-products](), [firewalls](), [mfa](), [network-segmentation](), [pci-dss](), [saas](), [scope](), [security](), [siem](), [tls](), [tokenization](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview This guide explains how PCI DSS applies to digital businesses that accept card payments, including SaaS companies and sellers of digital products. It outlines the standard's 12 requirements and discusses controls for networks, account data, vulnerabilities, access, monitoring, and information security. It also covers card-not-present transactions, recurring billing, and tokenization. ### Source excerpt PCI DSS compliance explained for digital businesses. Understand the 12 requirements, compliance levels, and how to reduce your scope when selling digital products online. ## Vercel CLI commands now scoped to local directory DevFeed: [Vercel CLI commands now scoped to local directory]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Melkey Moksyakov Published: 2026-04-06T07:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [Command-line interface](), [Vercel]() Tags: [cli](), [local](), [ls](), [projects](), [scope](), [update](), [vercel]() ### AI overview Vercel CLI commands such as vc project ls and vc domains ls now use the scope of the linked local directory by default instead of the global team. Users can still override the target team with the --scope flag, and the update requires Vercel CLI v50.40.0 or later. ### Source excerpt Commands like vc project ls and vc domains ls now automatically use the scope of your linked local directory instead of defaulting to your global team. Previously, querying projects or domains inside a linked repository would return global results, creating an unexpected disconnect between your immediate working environment and the CLI output. This update aligns read-only commands with your local context, though you can still manually override the target team by passing the --scope flag. Run pnpm i -g vercel@latest to update to the latest Vercel CLI (at least v50.40.0). Read more ## AI sandboxes & volumes: isolated environments for coding agents DevFeed: [AI sandboxes & volumes: isolated environments for coding agents]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ruben Fiszel Published: 2026-04-01T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Windmill Blog]() Topics: [AI Sandbox](), [AI-assisted coding](), [Claude Code](), [codex](), [Persistence](), [Authorization]() Tags: [agents](), [ai](), [claude-code](), [codex](), [coding-agents](), [environment-variables](), [launch-week](), [permission](), [persistence](), [sandboxes](), [scope](), [volumes]() ### AI overview Windmill introduces AI sandboxes that run Claude Code, Codex, and custom agents in isolated environments with persistent volumes. The article explains how annotations provide process isolation and storage, including synchronization with object storage, exclusive volume leases, caching, and per-user or per-group permissions. ### Source excerpt Introducing AI sandboxes: run Claude Code, Codex, or custom agents in isolated environments with persistent volumes on Windmill. ## How to migrate your paging tool without breaking your team DevFeed: [How to migrate your paging tool without breaking your team]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Eryn Carman Published: 2026-03-20T14:32:18Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [The incident.io Blog]() Topics: [migration](), [incident management](), [incident](), [Slack](), [systems]() Tags: [engineering](), [how-to](), [incident](), [incident-channel](), [incident-management](), [incident-response](), [migration](), [outage](), [post-mortem](), [scope](), [slack-incident](), [systems](), [tools](), [workflow]() ### AI overview This article presents a framework for migrating an engineering team's on-call and paging system without disrupting critical incident response. It argues that migration should be used to improve the broader incident-management workflow, including triage, communication, coordination, status updates, and postmortems, rather than simply replacing one paging tool with another. ### Source excerpt Migrating your paging tool is disruptive no matter what. The teams that come out ahead are the ones who use that disruption deliberately. Strategic CSM Eryn Carman shares the four-step framework she's used to help engineering teams migrate and improve their on-call programs. [Next page]()