# vulnerability management Published articles for vulnerability management. This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles. ## How Confluent Uses Third-Party Risk Assessments to Support Vendor Due Diligence DevFeed: [How Confluent Uses Third-Party Risk Assessments to Support Vendor Due Diligence]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Bethany Carter Published: 2026-09-15T16:40:06Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Confluent: Data in motion]() Topics: [Security](), [Business Security](), [vulnerability management](), [Cloud]() Tags: [apra](), [automated](), [cloud](), [compliance](), [confluent](), [confluent-cloud](), [data-protection](), [gdpr](), [identity](), [iso](), [nist](), [security](), [standards](), [third-party](), [trust-center](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview Confluent explains how its Trust Center provides third-party risk assessment reports to support vendor security, resilience, compliance, procurement, and customer due diligence. The article describes assessments including ProcessUnity Global Risk Exchange and control mapping to customer frameworks. ### Source excerpt Confluent's Trust Center simplifies vendor risk reviews with CyberGRX, CyberVadis, SIG, CAIQ, and TruSight/KY3P assessments. ## The state of AI for security: Measuring what matters most for building trust DevFeed: [The state of AI for security: Measuring what matters most for building trust]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Anshumali Shrivastava Published: 2026-09-09T19:09:14Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [AWS Security Blog]() Topics: [Cybersecurity](), [Vulnerabilities](), [dataset]() Tags: [advanced-300](), [ai](), [artificial-intelligence](), [benchmark](), [cybersecurity](), [generative-ai](), [machine-learning](), [open-source](), [security](), [security-blog](), [security-identity-compliance](), [thought-leadership](), [vulnerability](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview The article introduces Deception Benchmark, a benchmark for evaluating whether AI models can distinguish real software vulnerabilities from safe code that appears risky. It argues that reducing false alarms is central to making AI security tools trustworthy and compares this focus with existing security evaluations. ### Source excerpt Security teams are starting to actively use AI for security work, including vulnerability triage, penetration testing, threat modeling, incident response, and code review. The promise is speed, but a security tool that moves fast and raises too many false alarms doesn't save time. Engineers spend time on false alarms, on-call is noisier, and teams distrust [...] ## August 2026 Security Release DevFeed: [August 2026 Security Release]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Sebastian Silbermann Published: 2026-08-25T18:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Next.js Blog]() Topics: [Next.js](), [Security](), [vulnerability](), [vulnerability management](), [Open Source](), [Vercel]() Tags: [bug-bounty](), [next-js](), [open-source](), [release](), [security](), [vercel](), [vulnerability](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview Next.js released versions 16.3.3 and 15.5.24 to address critical vulnerabilities, including unauthenticated remote code execution through AVIF image optimization and on Windows-hosted servers. The patched releases disable AVIF optimization until an upstream fix is propagated. ### Source excerpt The August 2026 security release for Next.js is now available ## Update: August Next.js Security Release DevFeed: [Update: August Next.js Security Release]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Sebastian Silbermann Published: 2026-08-25T15:00:00Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [Next.js Blog]() Topics: [Vulnerabilities]() Tags: [bug-bounty](), [frameworks](), [next-js](), [open-source](), [release](), [security](), [update](), [vercel](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview Next.js is advancing its August security release to address two critical vulnerabilities in a single update and recommends that users upgrade when patched versions are available. ### Source excerpt Next.js is moving the August security release forward to August 25, 2026. ## AAOS SDV - Secure by Design DevFeed: [AAOS SDV - Secure by Design]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Android Developers (noreply@blogger.com) Published: 2026-08-24T16:00:31Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Android Developers Blog](), [Android Developers Blog]() Topics: [Android](), [Security](), [SELinux](), [virtualization](), [vulnerability management](), [Process](), [Resilience](), [Google]() Tags: [android](), [android-security](), [article](), [automotive](), [blog](), [deep-dive](), [google](), [process](), [resilience](), [security](), [selinux](), [virtualization](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview AAOS SDV is presented as a secure-by-design platform for software-defined vehicles. The article explains how virtualization isolates co-hosted domains, while Android UID-based process sandboxes, POSIX capabilities, and SELinux enforce least privilege and deny-by-default access. It also describes vulnerability response, penetration testing, security audits, and architectural reviews. ### Source excerpt Posted by Markus Vill, Software Engineer, Sean Keys, Security Engineer, and Istvan Nador, Software Engineer, Android Auto At Google, we believe our products should be secure by design, which is why we built the Android Automotive Operating System for Software Defined Vehicle (AAOS SDV) on existing, market-proven platforms, leveraging virtualization technologies like Cuttlefish. While our release announcements focused on the features, this blog post outlines some of the security concepts. Foundation: Domain IsolationVirtualization to isolate co-hosted instances The current trend of consolidating Electronic Control Units (ECUs) into a single chip reduces isolation by running multiple domains side-by-side. While AAOS SDV instances provide internal isolation mechanisms, it is often preferable to run logical domains independently. For instance, a cluster and an infotainment system have distinct requirements. We use virtual machines to run multiple instances in parallel, ensuring that sharing remains explicit and isolation is the default behavior. Inherited Android Security AAOS SDV evolved from Microdroid, a minimalistic Android version optimized for privacy virtual machines (pVM). This lineage provides Android platform engineers with established security features they already know. Process Isolation & Deny by Default AAOS SDV follows Android's User ID (UID)-based isolation model to set up a sandbox for each application. Each service runs in a dedicated process with a unique UID to manage access rights, data directories, and other restrictions. We employ Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) capabilities to strictly limit operations and pair this with Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) to enforce a "deny-by-default" posture. This approach restricts each service to the absolute minimum required, meaning missing configurations block access rather than creating an over-permissive system. We apply this same strategy to our communication permission system, as explained l ## How CISA's BOD 26-04 changes vulnerability prioritization DevFeed: [How CISA's BOD 26-04 changes vulnerability prioritization]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Christina DePinto; Sophie Wang Published: 2026-08-19T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Datadog | The Monitor blog]() Topics: [vulnerability](), [Vulnerabilities](), [Cybersecurity](), [Security](), [Automation]() Tags: [automation](), [business](), [cloud-security](), [compliance](), [cybersecurity](), [security](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview CISA's BOD 26-04 introduces risk-based vulnerability prioritization for federal agencies, using asset exposure, known exploitation, exploit automation, and technical impact to determine patching timelines. The article explains the directive's compliance challenges and how Datadog's Runtime Prioritization Engine can help teams prioritize remediation. ### Source excerpt Learn how CISA's BOD 26-04 mandates risk-based vulnerability prioritization and how Datadog helps teams prioritize and remediate critical findings. ## Prioritize security findings with the Datadog Runtime Prioritization Engine DevFeed: [Prioritize security findings with the Datadog Runtime Prioritization Engine]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Christina DePinto; Lucas Maley; Leo Wang Published: 2026-07-31T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Datadog | The Monitor blog]() Topics: [Vulnerabilities](), [telemetry](), [dashboards]() Tags: [agent](), [ai](), [cloud](), [cloud-security](), [collaboration](), [dashboards](), [on-call](), [security](), [telemetry](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview Datadog explains how its Runtime Prioritization Engine uses telemetry and security signals to infer ownership and prioritize cloud security findings affecting critical resources. ### Source excerpt Learn how the Datadog Runtime Prioritization Engine infers ownership and identifies business-critical resources to help you prioritize security findings. ## Why the CVE doom cycle cannot be solved by working harder DevFeed: [Why the CVE doom cycle cannot be solved by working harder]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Sam Barlien Published: 2026-07-23T05:40:01Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Platform Engineering Blog]() Topics: [vulnerability management](), [Automation](), [container-security](), [Vulnerabilities](), [configuration]() Tags: [automation](), [container-image-security](), [cve](), [false-positives](), [secure-by-design](), [security](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview The article argues that the recurring cycle of scanning, triaging, patching, and redeploying container images cannot be solved by working harder or using faster scanners. Because vulnerability findings and CVEs accumulate faster than manual remediation can handle, it recommends embedding vulnerability management into the platform through secure-by-design practices, golden paths, and automation. ### Source excerpt Manual CVE triage doesn't scale. Break the CVE doom cycle by shifting vulnerability management into the platform with golden paths and automation ## Understanding platform engineering's role in staying compliant with the EU's CRA DevFeed: [Understanding platform engineering's role in staying compliant with the EU's CRA]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Nigel Douglas Published: 2026-07-23T05:40:01Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Platform Engineering Blog]() Topics: [Platform Engineering](), [Security](), [vulnerability management](), [supply-chain-security](), [incident]() Tags: [compliance](), [cyber-resilience-act](), [engineering](), [eu](), [idp](), [incident](), [platform](), [platform-engineering](), [policy](), [regulatory](), [sboms](), [secure-by-default](), [secure-software](), [security](), [software-supply-chain](), [supply-chain](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview The article explains how platform engineering can operationalize compliance with the EU's Cyber Resilience Act by embedding secure-by-default practices, automated SBOMs, and rapid incident reporting into an Internal Development Platform. It also outlines CRA compliance milestones and manufacturer responsibilities, including vulnerability management and security updates. ### Source excerpt The EU's Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) mandates secure software by design. Discover how platform engineering operationalizes compliance by embedding secure-by-default standards, automated SBOMs, and rapid incident reporting into your Internal Development Platform (IDP). This approach transforms compliance into a frictionless golden path ## Vulnerability management core capabilities every platform should have DevFeed: [Vulnerability management core capabilities every platform should have]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Sam Barlien Published: 2026-07-23T05:40:01Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Platform Engineering Blog]() Topics: [vulnerability management](), [Security](), [Architecture & Design](), [Open Source]() Tags: [open-source](), [scale](), [security](), [shift-left](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview The article argues that platform teams should move vulnerability management into the platform so secure behavior becomes the default. It describes hardened images, policy-as-code, secure templates, secret rotation, scanning, and automated remediation as core capabilities for reducing developer toil, cognitive load, and vulnerability-related risk. ### Source excerpt Core platform capabilities to shift vulnerability management down: hardened images, policy-as-code, secure templates, secret rotation, scanning, and remediation ## Hydrate, Hack, Repeat: Security Summer Camp 2026 DevFeed: [Hydrate, Hack, Repeat: Security Summer Camp 2026]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: jgamblin Published: 2026-07-22T21:34:54Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Jerry Gamblin]() Topics: [Security](), [vulnerability management](), [vulnerability](), [data](), [Artificial Intelligence]() Tags: [2026](), [ai](), [black-hat](), [bsides](), [cisa](), [con](), [cves](), [data](), [kev-catalog](), [management](), [models](), [research](), [security](), [talks](), [uncategorized](), [vulnerability](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview A personal guide to the author's 2026 security conference schedule, new role as Head of Research at Empirical Security, and recommended CVE and vulnerability talks. It argues that effective vulnerability management requires granular, transparent, accurate data, citing the growth in CVEs and the limited share listed in CISA KEV. ### Source excerpt My schedule, a new role at Empirical Security, and the CVE and vulnerability talks worth your time. It is almost the first week of August, which means it is time to point myself at the desert one more time. BSides Las Vegas, Black Hat, and DEF CON all land back to back, and for me ... Read more ## Reduce SAST false positives with agentic evaluation and Bits Memories DevFeed: [Reduce SAST false positives with agentic evaluation and Bits Memories]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Cole Maring Published: 2026-07-06T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Datadog | The Monitor blog]() Topics: [Static code analysis](), [Application Security](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [bits ai](), [Vulnerabilities](), [Security]() Tags: [agentic](), [ai](), [analysis](), [application-security](), [bits-ai](), [code](), [code-security](), [developer](), [devsecops](), [learn](), [post](), [security](), [threat-detection](), [tools](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview Datadog's Static Code Analysis uses Bits AI agentic evaluation to investigate SAST findings across a repository, combining related code paths, callers, and validators with organization-specific knowledge from Bits Memories. The goal is to distinguish true vulnerabilities from false positives and speed security triage. ### Source excerpt Learn how Bits AI in Datadog Static Code Analysis uses repository-wide reasoning and custom context to help make security triage faster and more accurate. ## How to Govern Autonomous Agents in Enterprise AI Factories DevFeed: [How to Govern Autonomous Agents in Enterprise AI Factories]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Michelle Horton Published: 2026-06-29T15:50:13Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [NVIDIA Developer](), [NVIDIA Technical Blog]() Topics: [Artificial Intelligence](), [AI Factory](), [systems](), [vulnerability management](), [configuration](), [Network](), [SOC](), [ide](), [browser](), [Terminal]() Tags: [agentic-ai-generative-ai](), [agents](), [ai](), [ai-agent](), [ai-factory](), [architecture](), [autonomous](), [autonomous-agents](), [browser](), [data-center-cloud](), [enterprise](), [featured](), [ide](), [mlops](), [network](), [openshell](), [policy](), [soc](), [telemetry](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview This tutorial presents NVIDIA's Secure Agent Workspace Reference Design for governing autonomous AI agents in enterprise environments. It explains how to separate the presentation layer from managed agent execution and enforce identity, network access, credentials, runtime policy, auditing, human review, and workspace isolation. ### Source excerpt AI agents are quickly moving beyond chat. They inspect code, run tests, read documents, search knowledge bases, query internal systems, and operate for hours on... ## Why risk acceptance isn't a viable option, with Jaya Baloo DevFeed: [Why risk acceptance isn't a viable option, with Jaya Baloo]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: info@1password.com (Dave Lewis) Published: 2026-06-12T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Blog on 1Password Blog]() Topics: [Vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability management](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Security](), [Large Language Model](), [Open Source Models & Datasets](), [Orchestration](), [Security, Privacy and Abuse Prevention]() Tags: [ai](), [apple](), [llms](), [open-source](), [orchestration](), [podcasts](), [security](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview This podcast episode discusses the risks and hype surrounding AI-powered vulnerability discovery. Jaya Baloo argues that security teams should address existing weaknesses such as poor asset visibility, remediation backlogs, inconsistent logging, and weak operational practices, while also considering how smaller open-source models and effective orchestration can uncover vulnerabilities that larger systems miss. ### Source excerpt Listen to this episode on Apple Podcasts null Listen now Listen to this episode on Spotify null Listen now Anyone who thinks security leaders are humorless sticklers for the rules has never spent half an hour with Jaya Baloo. But in this episode of Chasing Entropy, Dave Lewis does just that, and the result is a frank and irreverent conversation that proves that security may be serious business, but it's still a fun job. Baloo is the co-founder and COO/CISO of Aisle, an AI-powered vulnerability management startup with the bold goal of "zero exploitable vulnerabilities." Baloo's career has spanned telecom, cryptography, enterprise security, and AI-driven security research, but her love of computers started when she got her first computer (a Commodore 64) at age 9. The conversation tracks her journey from early BBS war dialing and CompuServe stories to the modern challenge of defending organizations against increasingly autonomous systems. A major focus of the episode is the growing hype around AI-powered vulnerability discovery. Baloo acknowledges the seriousness of the threat, saying "It introduces this asymmetry in terms of attacker-defender advantage, where the advantage would strongly go to the attacker if they're capable of finding new and novel vulnerabilities, and the ability to exploit them, and potentially doing this at scale, autonomously." However, she cautions that fear of a Mythos-level model shouldn't leave security leaders feeling too overwhelmed to take action. "We have elevated this to a level of hype that is not that beneficial to actually doing something about the problem." Instead of panicking about the unknown, Baloo advises security to start by addressing the problems they are aware of. Organizations already struggle with asset visibility, remediation backlogs, inconsistent logging, and weak operational hygiene. AI may have increased the blast radius of these risks, but they existed long before LLMs. The discussion also explores how smaller, open ## CMMC Phase 2, explained: Requirements, deadlines, and who's affected DevFeed: [CMMC Phase 2, explained: Requirements, deadlines, and who's affected]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Chainguard: Unchained]() Topics: [Cybersecurity](), [Security & Privacy](), [Cryptography](), [vulnerability management](), [vulnerability scanning](), [Encryption](), [MFA]() Tags: [certificates](), [cmmc](), [cmmc-container-images](), [cmmc-phase-2](), [cmvp](), [compliance](), [cve](), [cybersecurity-maturity-model-certification](), [fips](), [nist](), [sboms](), [stig](), [stigs](), [supply-chain](), [u-s-dod](), [vulnerability-management](), [vulnerability-scanning]() ### AI overview This article explains the requirements, deadlines, and scope of CMMC Phase 2. It describes the CMMC Level 2 certification requirements for organizations handling Controlled Unclassified Information or supporting Department of Defense and certain civilian agency contracts, including MFA, encryption, vulnerability scanning, supported systems, independent assessments, and compliance documentation. ### Source excerpt CMMC Phase 2 and NIST 800-171 are here. Learn how Chainguard helps teams meet compliance with FIPS, STIGs, and zero-CVE containers. ## PCI DSS Compliance: What Digital Businesses Need to Know DevFeed: [PCI DSS Compliance: What Digital Businesses Need to Know]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Ayush Agarwal Published: 2026-04-15T00:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Dodo Payments Blog]() Topics: [Security](), [Social engineering](), [Network Segmentation](), [TLS (Transport Layer Security)](), [vulnerability management](), [SIEM, Security](), [Software as a service](), [tokenization]() Tags: [compliance](), [digital-products](), [firewalls](), [mfa](), [network-segmentation](), [pci-dss](), [saas](), [scope](), [security](), [siem](), [tls](), [tokenization](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview This guide explains how PCI DSS applies to digital businesses that accept card payments, including SaaS companies and sellers of digital products. It outlines the standard's 12 requirements and discusses controls for networks, account data, vulnerabilities, access, monitoring, and information security. It also covers card-not-present transactions, recurring billing, and tokenization. ### Source excerpt PCI DSS compliance explained for digital businesses. Understand the 12 requirements, compliance levels, and how to reduce your scope when selling digital products online. ## Removing supply chain friction: How PeopleTec improved developer productivity with Chainguard DevFeed: [Removing supply chain friction: How PeopleTec improved developer productivity with Chainguard]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2026-04-02T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Chainguard: Unchained]() Topics: [Security](), [supply-chain-security](), [chainguard containers](), [Containers](), [code productivity](), [migration]() Tags: [accelerate](), [chainguard](), [chainguard-assemble](), [chainguard-containers](), [chainguard-developer-experience](), [chainguard-migration](), [ci](), [code](), [containers](), [cve-remediation](), [developer](), [developer-velocity](), [migration](), [migration-guides](), [peopletec](), [provenance](), [security](), [supply-chain](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview PeopleTec describes how it used Chainguard Security controls and Chainguard Containers to reduce software supply-chain friction, address vulnerabilities in base images, improve provenance and compliance workflows, and support developer productivity. The approach emphasized early adopters, low-friction migration, and automated policy checks in CI. ### Source excerpt Learn how PeopleTec used Chainguard to reduce security friction, accelerate adoption, and align platform consistency with developer velocity. ## Intelligent security at ClickHouse speed: How Cogent Security built an AI-native vulnerability management platform DevFeed: [Intelligent security at ClickHouse speed: How Cogent Security built an AI-native vulnerability management platform]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: ClickHouse Published: 2026-03-24T06:58:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [ClickHouse Blog]() Topics: [clickhouse](), [vulnerability management](), [Vulnerabilities](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Security](), [AI Development](), [Database](), [Software](), [Architecture & Design]() Tags: [agent](), [agentic](), [agents](), [ai](), [architecture](), [clickhouse](), [coding](), [data](), [database](), [latency](), [security](), [speed](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview Cogent Security uses ClickHouse to power an AI-native vulnerability management platform that serves billions of security findings at sub-second speeds. Migrating from Postgres reduced P90 query latency from five seconds to under one second at 100 million rows, while an agentic loop architecture and ClickHouse projections improved Chart Agent accuracy from 40% to 94%. ### Source excerpt "The key thing that ClickHouse unlocks for AI is speed. Everything we do needs to be done at machine speed to counter AI-enabled attackers." Karan Gugle, Founding Engineer ## Forrester TEI study: Chainguard Containers delivered 233% return on investment DevFeed: [Forrester TEI study: Chainguard Containers delivered 233% return on investment]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2026-02-18T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Chainguard: Unchained]() Topics: [chainguard containers](), [container-security](), [chainguard](), [vulnerability management](), [Containers](), [Vulnerabilities](), [Application Security](), [Open Source]() Tags: [chainguard](), [chainguard-containers](), [chainguard-forrester](), [chainguard-roi](), [chainguard-value](), [cmmc](), [compliance](), [container-security](), [containers](), [forrester-tei](), [open-source](), [pci-dss](), [security](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview A Forrester Consulting Total Economic Impact study commissioned by Chainguard reports that customers using Chainguard Containers achieved a 233% return on investment over three years, with $2.5 million in benefits and payback in less than six months. The article attributes these results to reduced vulnerabilities, simpler maintenance, and lower compliance overhead, supported by minimal zero-CVE container images and automated remediation. ### Source excerpt Explore the latest Forrester Consulting Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study, commissioned by Chainguard. ## Announcing AWS Inspector scanner support for Chainguard Libraries DevFeed: [Announcing AWS Inspector scanner support for Chainguard Libraries]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2025-11-24T00:00:00Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [Chainguard: Unchained]() Topics: [chainguard libraries](), [Amazon Web Services](), [vulnerability management](), [Malware](), [vulnerability](), [container images](), [Python](), [Django](), [Flask]() Tags: [amazon-scanner-support](), [aws](), [aws-inspector](), [chainguard-aws-integration](), [chainguard-libraries](), [chainguard-libraries-for-python](), [chainguard-libraries-for-python-aws](), [chainguard-packages](), [container-images](), [cve](), [cve-remediation](), [django](), [flask](), [malware](), [malware-prevention](), [python](), [security](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview Chainguard Libraries for Python now integrates with Amazon Inspector's enhanced scanning for Amazon ECR. The integration provides malware prevention, recognition of Chainguard-remediated CVEs, and a unified view of container and library vulnerabilities across AWS workloads. ### Source excerpt Chainguard Libraries now integrates with AWS Inspector, bringing proactive malware prevention, CVE remediation, and vulnerability visibility across AWS workloads ## Get up to Speed on FedRAMP 20x DevFeed: [Get up to Speed on FedRAMP 20x]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2025-10-23T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Chainguard: Unchained]() Topics: [Cloud](), [DevSecOps](), [Security](), [supply-chain-security](), [Vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability management](), [Cloud Native Ecosystem](), [Containers](), [Automation](), [Authorization](), [Software as a service]() Tags: [2025](), [2026](), [ato](), [automation](), [chainguard-compliance](), [chainguard-containers](), [chainguard-fedramp-solution](), [chainguard-for-fedramp](), [cloud](), [cloud-native](), [compliance](), [containers](), [containers-for-fedramp](), [devsecops](), [fedramp](), [fedramp-20x](), [fedramp-containers](), [provenance](), [saas](), [security](), [software-supply-chain](), [standards](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview FedRAMP 20x modernizes cloud authorization through continuous, automation-driven assurance, machine-readable documentation, and streamlined assessment processes. The article explains implications for containerized workloads, vulnerability management, software supply-chain security, ATOs, and organizations transitioning from FedRAMP Rev. 5. ### Source excerpt FedRAMP 20x is transforming cloud compliance with automation and continuous security. Learn how Chainguard Containers simplify 20x readiness with 0-CVE images. ## From Two Years to Two Weeks: How Labelbox Erased Its Security Debt with Snyk's AI-Accelerated Remediation DevFeed: [From Two Years to Two Weeks: How Labelbox Erased Its Security Debt with Snyk's AI-Accelerated Remediation]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Snyk Team Published: 2025-09-18T04:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Blog RSS Feed | Snyk]() Topics: [cursor](), [AI-assisted coding]() Tags: [ai](), [blog](), [cursor](), [customer](), [devsecops](), [security](), [validation](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview Labelbox used Cursor with Snyk Studio to validate and prioritize SAST findings, reducing its security backlog from a projected multi-year effort to weeks. ### Source excerpt Discover how Labelbox transformed security backlog management from two years to two weeks with Snyk's AI-accelerated remediation. ## Understanding CRA Compliance: Overcoming Challenges with an Integrated Security Testing Approach DevFeed: [Understanding CRA Compliance: Overcoming Challenges with an Integrated Security Testing Approach]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Snyk Team Published: 2025-06-25T23:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Blog RSS Feed | Snyk]() Topics: [Security](), [Testing](), [vulnerability management](), [DevOps](), [Tooling](), [Vulnerabilities](), [Development](), [Open Source]() Tags: [awareness](), [best-practices](), [blog](), [community](), [compliance](), [cra-requirements](), [cyber-resilience-act](), [cybersecurity](), [dependencies](), [deployment](), [developer](), [developers](), [development](), [devops](), [engineering](), [eu](), [scanners](), [secure-by-design](), [security](), [snyk-code](), [snyk-iac](), [snyk-learn](), [snyk-open-source](), [testing](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability](), [vulnerability-management](), [workflows]() ### AI overview This article explains how the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) changes software delivery expectations for organizations serving the EU. It highlights continuous security validation across proprietary code, open source libraries, and third-party dependencies, and recommends integrated security testing, secure-by-design practices, aligned teams, modern tooling, and security embedded in daily development workflows. ### Source excerpt Learn how to meet CRA requirements with integrated security testing, secure-by-design workflows, and scalable practices for modern dev teams. ## One Year Later: Signing CISA's Secure by Design Pledge DevFeed: [One Year Later: Signing CISA's Secure by Design Pledge]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2025-06-10T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Chainguard: Unchained]() Topics: [chainguard](), [cisa](), [cve remediation](), [container images](), [MFA](), [Security](), [Single sign-on (SSO)](), [passwords](), [chainguard vms](), [ssh]() Tags: [authentication](), [chainguard](), [chainguard-containers](), [chainguard-vms](), [cisa](), [container-images](), [cve](), [cve-remediation](), [mfa](), [okta](), [password](), [passwords](), [secure-by-design](), [secure-by-design-pledge](), [secure-software](), [security](), [shift-left](), [ssh](), [sso](), [vulnerabilities](), [vulnerability-management]() ### AI overview Chainguard reviews its progress one year after signing CISA's Secure by Design pledge, including CVE remediation across its container images, company-wide MFA through Okta SSO, and password-free access with automated SSH key provisioning for Chainguard VMs. ### Source excerpt Chainguard signed CISA's Secure by Design pledge in 2024. One year later, we look at progress we've made in key areas like CVE remediation and disclosures. [Next page]()