# audit A systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining and objectively evaluating evidence against audit criteria, including assessing system controls for compliance with policies and procedures. This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles. ## Fixed release schedule scrapped (old schedule restored) DevFeed: [Fixed release schedule scrapped (old schedule restored)]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Leah Rowe Published: 2026-09-17T16:33:13.815653Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [News about Libreboot releases and development]() Topics: [libreboot](), [releases](), [audit](), [builds](), [ci](), [coreboot](), [Linux]() Tags: [article](), [audit](), [bios](), [build-system](), [canoeboot](), [ci](), [coreboot](), [free-software](), [libre](), [libreboot](), [linux](), [news](), [opensource](), [releases](), [uefi]() ### AI overview Libreboot has abandoned its fixed annual release schedule after skipping the June 2026 release and deciding to skip December 2026. The next release is expected sometime in 2027. The project is also considering automated build and release testing, potentially through CI and regular snapshot builds, while continuing an audit and simplification of its build system. ### Source excerpt Article: Fixed release schedule scrapped (old schedule restored) Web link: https://libreboot.org/news/resolutions.html ## Libreboot Build System Audit 6 DevFeed: [Libreboot Build System Audit 6]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Leah Rowe Published: 2026-09-17T04:32:50.666044Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [News about Libreboot releases and development]() Topics: [audit](), [POSIX](), [Shell](), [Code](), [releases]() Tags: [audit](), [bios](), [build-system](), [canoeboot](), [code](), [coreboot](), [free-software](), [libre](), [libreboot](), [opensource](), [release](), [return](), [shell](), [uefi]() ### AI overview This article reports on the sixth audit of Libreboot's lbmk build system. It describes code cleanup, bug fixes, feature changes, and a reduction from 1,482 to 1,109 lines of shell script, a 25% decrease, between the Libreboot 20240612 release and the 19 July 2024 revision. ### Source excerpt Article: Libreboot Build System Audit 6 Web link: https://libreboot.org/news/audit6.html ## Libreboot 20240612 released! DevFeed: [Libreboot 20240612 released!]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Leah Rowe Published: 2026-09-17T04:32:50.666044Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [News about Libreboot releases and development]() Topics: [libreboot](), [releases](), [coreboot](), [UEFI](), [x86](), [audit](), [Arm]() Tags: [arm](), [audit](), [bios](), [boot](), [canoeboot](), [coreboot](), [free-software](), [libre](), [libreboot](), [open-source](), [opensource](), [release](), [uefi](), [x86]() ### AI overview Libreboot 20240612 is a stable bugfix release of the open-source BIOS/UEFI firmware distribution. It fixes bugs from the previous release, incorporates changes from the fifth build-system audit, and adds minor build-system features and fixes. ### Source excerpt Article: Libreboot 20240612 released! Web link: https://libreboot.org/news/libreboot20240612.html ## Libreboot 20241206, 8th revision released! ThinkPad T480 backlight keys fixed, Pico 2 serprog support, other fixes DevFeed: [Libreboot 20241206, 8th revision released! ThinkPad T480 backlight keys fixed, Pico 2 serprog support, other fixes]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Leah Rowe Published: 2026-09-17T04:32:50.666044Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [News about Libreboot releases and development]() Topics: [libreboot](), [releases](), [coreboot](), [UEFI](), [audit](), [x86](), [Hardware]() Tags: [arm](), [audit](), [bios](), [canoeboot](), [coreboot](), [firmware](), [free-software](), [libre](), [libreboot](), [opensource](), [release](), [thunderbolt](), [uefi](), [x86]() ### AI overview Libreboot 20241206 revision 8 is presented as a near-new release with more than 100 changes since revision 7. The release fixes ThinkPad T480 backlight keys, adds Pico 2 serprog support, and includes early changes from the seventh Libreboot Build System Audit. It also documents firmware distribution and other fixes. ### Source excerpt Article: Libreboot 20241206, 8th revision released! ThinkPad T480 backlight keys fixed, Pico 2 serprog support, other fixes Web link: https://libreboot.org/news/libreboot20241206rev8.html ## Libreboot Build System Audit 4 DevFeed: [Libreboot Build System Audit 4]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Leah Rowe Published: 2026-09-17T04:32:50.666044Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [News about Libreboot releases and development]() Topics: [audit](), [Shell](), [Code](), [coding style](), [Open Source]() Tags: [article](), [audit](), [bios](), [build](), [build-system](), [canoeboot](), [coding-style](), [complexity](), [coreboot](), [free-software](), [libre](), [libreboot](), [opensource](), [patches](), [uefi]() ### AI overview This article reviews the fourth audit of the Libreboot build system, lbmk, covering code cleanup, generalization, new features, and bug fixes. It reports a reduction from 1,744 to 1,618 shell-script SLOC and a corresponding 7.22% decrease in complexity, while functionality increased. ### Source excerpt Article: Libreboot Build System Audit 4 Web link: https://libreboot.org/news/audit4.html ## Libreboot Build System Audit 2 DevFeed: [Libreboot Build System Audit 2]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Leah Rowe Published: 2026-09-17T04:32:50.666044Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [News about Libreboot releases and development]() Topics: [audit](), [Development](), [Shell](), [Code](), [Documentation]() Tags: [audit](), [bios](), [bugs](), [build](), [canoeboot](), [code](), [coreboot](), [development](), [documentation](), [error-handling](), [free-software](), [general](), [libre](), [libreboot](), [opensource](), [shell](), [uefi]() ### AI overview This article reports on a completed audit of Libreboot's build system, lbmk, as of 11 September 2023. It describes bug fixes, improved documentation and error handling, fewer scripts, unified logic, and a reduction in shell source lines from 3,388 to 2,644, or 22%. ### Source excerpt Article: Libreboot Build System Audit 2 Web link: https://libreboot.org/news/audit2.html ## Libreboot Build System Audit 5 DevFeed: [Libreboot Build System Audit 5]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Leah Rowe Published: 2026-09-17T04:32:50.666044Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [News about Libreboot releases and development]() Topics: [audit](), [opensource](), [boot](), [POSIX](), [ide](), [systems]() Tags: [audit](), [bios](), [bugs](), [canoeboot](), [clean-code](), [coreboot](), [efficiency](), [firmware](), [free-software](), [libre](), [libreboot](), [linux](), [opensource](), [operating-systems](), [posix](), [uefi]() ### AI overview This article describes the fifth audit of Libreboot's lbmk build system, covering changes made since the Libreboot 20240504 release. It reports a reduction in shell-script size, bug fixes, feature changes, and improvements aimed at cleaner and more efficient code. ### Source excerpt Article: Libreboot Build System Audit 5 Web link: https://libreboot.org/news/audit5.html ## Libreboot Build System Audit 3 DevFeed: [Libreboot Build System Audit 3]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Leah Rowe Published: 2026-09-17T04:32:50.666044Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [News about Libreboot releases and development]() Topics: [audit](), [maintenance](), [Error Handling](), [Shell]() Tags: [audit](), [audits](), [bios](), [bug](), [build-system](), [canoeboot](), [complexity](), [coreboot](), [efficiency](), [error-handling](), [free-software](), [integrity](), [libre](), [libreboot](), [opensource](), [safety](), [threading](), [uefi]() ### AI overview This article reports on Libreboot Build System Audit 3, focusing on the lbmk build system. It describes improved error handling, bug fixes, efficiency improvements, reduced complexity, stronger vendor-file integrity checks, and broader use of multithreading. The audit reduced the build system from 2,644 to 1,744 shell-script source lines compared with the previous audit, without reducing functionality. ### Source excerpt Article: Libreboot Build System Audit 3 Web link: https://libreboot.org/news/audit3.html ## AI Agent Governance: Why It Belongs in Your Platform DevFeed: [AI Agent Governance: Why It Belongs in Your Platform]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Prateek Mittal Published: 2026-09-16T20:28:57.610955Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Harness Blog]() Topics: [AI Agent](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [observability](), [audit](), [test](), [Deployment](), [Monitoring](), [pull-requests]() Tags: [ai](), [ai-agent](), [audit](), [deployment](), [governance](), [monitoring](), [observability](), [pull-requests](), [test]() ### AI overview Engineering leaders from Yelp, Platformable, and Harness argue that AI agent governance must be automated, continuously enforced, and built into the platform rather than left to policy documents. The article discusses audit trails, agent-to-agent access controls, experiment tracking, testing, latency monitoring, rollback paths, and observability for agent-driven changes. ### Source excerpt Engineering leaders from Yelp, Platformable, and Harness explain why AI agent governance has to be built into the platform, not a policy doc. | Blog ## Native Splunk brings real-time insights to Cisco Nexus One DevFeed: [Native Splunk brings real-time insights to Cisco Nexus One]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: David Keith Published: 2026-09-16T15:00:59Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Cisco Blogs]() Topics: [Nexus Dashboard](), [observability](), [telemetry](), [datacenter](), [Security](), [sensitive data](), [audit](), [configuration]() Tags: [analytics](), [audit](), [cisco](), [cisco-nexus-dashboard](), [configuration](), [data-center](), [data-center-networking](), [network](), [nexus-one](), [observability](), [real-time](), [sensitive-data](), [splunk](), [troubleshooting]() ### AI overview Cisco describes native Splunk embedded in Cisco Nexus Dashboard as an on-premises analytics and observability capability for data center and AI workloads. It processes telemetry locally, correlates network, security, configuration, and audit data, and provides dashboards, searches, and alerts for troubleshooting, data sovereignty, compliance, and cost efficiency. ### Source excerpt Discover how native Splunk embedded in Cisco Nexus Dashboard delivers real-time analytics, faster troubleshooting, and on-premises data sovereignty for modern data center and AI workloads. ## tota11y - an accessibility visualization toolkit DevFeed: [tota11y - an accessibility visualization toolkit]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Khan Academy Published: 2015-06-08T22:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Khan Academy]() Topics: [Accessibility](), [audit](), [Testing](), [Tooling](), [browser](), [Chrome]() Tags: [accessibility](), [accessibility-testing](), [audit](), [browser](), [chrome](), [developer-tools](), [engineering](), [frontend](), [linter](), [news](), [testing](), [tests](), [tooling](), [unit-tests](), [visualization](), [web](), [web-frontend]() ### AI overview Khan Academy announces tota11y, an accessibility visualization toolkit designed to make manual accessibility testing easier for developers. The article describes its development and use of browser-based annotations to help teams understand and fix accessibility issues. ### Source excerpt By Jordan Scales Today we're releasing tota11y (on GitHub), an accessibility visualization toolkit that aims to reduce the ... Read more ## How to tell agent traffic from user traffic DevFeed: [How to tell agent traffic from user traffic]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: WorkOS Published: 2026-09-16T00:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [WorkOS Blog]() Topics: [JSON Web Tokens](), [audit trail](), [audit](), [Security](), [Authorization]() Tags: [agent](), [audit](), [audit-trail](), [auth](), [how-to](), [logs](), [security]() ### AI overview This tutorial explains how to distinguish agent traffic from user traffic in access and audit logs. It describes identifying agent tokens with a claim, separating the acting agent from the delegating user, and recording both identities so automated changes can be queried accurately. ### Source excerpt Your access logs probably say a person did something an agent did. Four claims fix that, and one of them exists for exactly this purpose. ## Is Agentic now tailors its audit by site type DevFeed: [Is Agentic now tailors its audit by site type]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Rich Haines Published: 2026-09-16T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Vercel News]() Topics: [audit](), [App](), [API](), [Authentication](), [Error Handling](), [SDKs]() Tags: [api](), [app](), [audit](), [authentication](), [error-handling](), [sdk]() ### AI overview Is Agentic reports now support four site-type views: Docs & content, Business, App, and Commerce. The selected view changes which checks are highlighted, while scores remain comparable and unchanged. ### Source excerpt Is Agentic reports now let you view your checks through one of four site types: Docs & content, Business, App, or Commerce. For example, the Commerce view highlights payment and checkout standards like x402, UCP, and ACP, while the App view highlights API discovery, authentication, error handling, and SDK support. Your score stays the same in every view, and you can change views on an existing report without rescanning. Only the highlighted checks change, so you can focus on what matters for your kind of site while keeping scores comparable across sites. To set the default view, add a single meta tag to your page's : Set the value to match your site type: content for Docs & content business for Business app for App store for Commerce The tag only sets which view readers see first. It doesn't add points or change your score. If no type is declared, Is Agentic infers one and shows which type it chose. Run a check at is-agentic.com or read the documentation. Read more ## CISA's Logging Reference Architecture for OMB M-26-14: What federal agencies should do next DevFeed: [CISA's Logging Reference Architecture for OMB M-26-14: What federal agencies should do next]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Woody Walton Published: 2026-09-16T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Elastic Blog - Elasticsearch, Kibana, and ELK Stack]() Topics: [cisa](), [Logging](), [cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency](), [log management](), [Architecture & Design](), [implementation](), [audit](), [Security]() Tags: [architecture](), [audit](), [cisa](), [cybersecurity-and-infrastructure-security-agency](), [cybersecurity-open-source-standards-log-management-government](), [government](), [implementation](), [logging](), [logs](), [public-sector](), [security]() ### AI overview This Elastic blog explains CISA's Logging Reference Architecture for OMB M-26-14 and the actions federal civilian executive branch agencies must take. It highlights planning and maturity deadlines, recommends assessing existing capabilities and documenting gaps, and discusses storage tiers, retrieval, immutability, and audit requirements. ### Source excerpt Now that CISA has released its Logging Reference Architecture (LRA) for OMB M-26-14, federal agencies tasked to complete their logging plans. In this blog, we walk you through the most important aspects of the LRA guidance. ## Datasette 1.0a39 and 0.65.4 security releases DevFeed: [Datasette 1.0a39 and 0.65.4 security releases]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Simon Willison Published: 2026-09-11T03:27:16Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Simon Willison's Weblog]() Topics: [releases](), [Security](), [audit](), [AI-assisted coding](), [ai security](), [agentic-engineering](), [Generative AI](), [Large Language Model](), [Claude](), [gpt-6-astra]() Tags: [agentic-engineering](), [agentic-engineering-63](), [ai](), [ai-2-236](), [ai-security-research](), [ai-security-research-42](), [coding-agents](), [datasette](), [datasette-1-542](), [generative-ai](), [generative-ai-1-982](), [llms](), [llms-1-948](), [releases](), [releases-31](), [security](), [security-634](), [tests]() ### AI overview Datasette 1.0a39 and 0.65.4 are security patch releases for the alpha and stable series. They address issues found during an extensive audit, including instances that mix public and private tables. The audit used Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-5.6, and GPT-6 Astra alongside human review and automated tests. ### Source excerpt Datasette 1.0a39 and 0.65.4 security releases Today we're releasing two new security patch versions of Datasette: 1.0a39 and 0.65.4 - one for the current alpha series and one for the stable 0.65.x family. These are security fixes which you should apply if you are running a Datasette instance on the public web - in particular if that instance mixes both public and private tables. Following issues reported by Sevban Dönmez, Alex Garcia and I ran an extensive audit of Datasette using Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-5.6, and GPT-6 Astra. We then spent almost a week collaborating on and reviewing the fixes. They helped find some very subtle bugs. We'll be incorporating security audits by frontier models into all of our development work going forward. Alex came up with a way of splitting the work which I found extremely productive: Alex Garcia and I worked together running and then responding to the audit, working in a shared private repository. For most of the issues we split the work: one of us would create the automated tests highlighting the issue, then the other would implement the fix. This ensured that two separate humans had eyes on each of the issues, in addition to our coding agents running different models. Tags: releases, security, ai, datasette, generative-ai, llms, agentic-engineering, ai-security-research ## ISO 42001 Evidence: What Auditors Ask For DevFeed: [ISO 42001 Evidence: What Auditors Ask For]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: info@goteleport.com (Preet Dhatt) Published: 2026-09-03T00:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Teleport]() Topics: [audit](), [AI Development](), [Deployment](), [CI/CD](), [data-governance](), [Monitoring](), [Requirements]() Tags: [ai](), [ai-development](), [article](), [audit](), [ci-cd](), [data-governance](), [deployment](), [eu](), [iso](), [monitoring](), [requirements]() ### AI overview This article explains what auditors look for in ISO 42001 evidence and how organizations can connect access, approvals, infrastructure, CI/CD activity, releases, and production changes into an evidence trail. It also discusses monitoring, human oversight, third-party access, and data governance within an AI Management System. ### Source excerpt Prepare ISO 42001 audit evidence that proves your controls work in practice. ## Auditing an AI setup and keeping key components independent of providers DevFeed: [Auditing an AI setup and keeping key components independent of providers]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Nate Published: 2026-09-02T13:01:35Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Nate's Substack]() Topics: [Artificial Intelligence](), [audit](), [prompt](), [test]() Tags: [ai](), [audit](), [plan](), [prompt](), [setup](), [test]() ### AI overview The article discusses a $600-plus AI setup, components kept outside individual providers, and a test used to evaluate expensive plans. ### Source excerpt My $600-plus AI setup, what I keep outside every provider, and the test each expensive plan has to pass. ## Representative Line: So Much Room DevFeed: [Representative Line: So Much Room]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Remy Porter Published: 2026-09-01T06:30:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [The Daily WTF]() Topics: [audit]() Tags: [audit](), [representative-line]() ### AI overview A representative comment was truncated because its audit text field was sized too narrowly, with the missing content apparently lost during a careless merge. ### Source excerpt Today's representative comment ran out of room. int maxLen = getColumnSize(session, "audit", "text_value1") - 16; // Leave some room for No, it isn't continued on the next line and just got trimmed out, except perhaps by a careless merge. This is the entire comment. Clearly, written by David Chase, the creator of "The Sopranos". There are so many things we might be leaving room for. We could leave some room for dessert. Leave some room for activities. Leave some room for the holy spirit. Leave some room for improvisation. [Advertisement] ProGet's got you covered with security and access controls on your NuGet feeds. Learn more. ## Mintlify introduces instant rollbacks for Enterprise deployments DevFeed: [Mintlify introduces instant rollbacks for Enterprise deployments]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: David Isquick Published: 2026-08-31T00:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Mintlify Blog]() Topics: [Deployment](), [audit](), [Pull Request](), [GitHub](), [GitLab](), [bitbucket]() Tags: [access-control](), [announcements](), [audit](), [configuration](), [deployment](), [pull-request](), [rollback]() ### AI overview Mintlify has introduced instant rollbacks for Enterprise customers, allowing them to restore one of their last 10 successful builds from the dashboard in seconds. Rollbacks are recorded in audit logs and currently support non-authenticated pages. ### Source excerpt Instant rollbacks are now live for Mintlify Enterprise customers. You can roll back to a known good deployment in seconds, without waiting on a full rebuild. ## 【kube-apiserver】Authorization 与 Audit：RBAC、SAR 与 403 分列 DevFeed: [【kube-apiserver】Authorization 与 Audit：RBAC、SAR 与 403 分列]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Liao Tonglang Published: 2026-08-28T00:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: zh Sources: [土法炼钢 - 系统与基础设施]() Topics: [Authorization](), [Kubernetes](), [audit](), [API]() Tags: [403](), [admission](), [api](), [apiserver](), [audit](), [auth](), [authorization](), [authz](), [distributed](), [etcd](), [http](), [k8s](), [kubernetes](), [policy](), [post](), [rbac](), [subjectaccessreview](), [v1](), [v1-30-3](), [webhook]() ### AI overview This tutorial explains Kubernetes v1.30.3 authorization and auditing. It distinguishes the RBAC, Node, Webhook, and legacy ABAC authorizer paths; describes SAR and SSAR access checks; outlines audit policies and stages; and explains why user-facing 403 errors come from Kubernetes authorization rather than etcd permissions or Admission failures. ### Source excerpt 钉 K8s v1.30.3 的授权链：RBAC、Node、Webhook、ABAC（遗留）；SubjectAccessReview / SelfSubjectAccessReview 用法；Audit policy 四级；403 与 etcd 权限错误、Admission 拒绝的分列；不把 etcd 的 mTLS 错误写成 K8s RBAC 故障。 ## What Replaces Git When Agents Write the Code DevFeed: [What Replaces Git When Agents Write the Code]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Published: 2026-08-19T00:00:00Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Gaurav Sarma's Blog]() Topics: [Git](), [GitHub](), [pull-requests](), [ci](), [Code](), [audit]() Tags: [agents](), [audit](), [ci](), [code](), [context-window](), [git](), [github](), [logs](), [pull-requests]() ### AI overview The article argues that Git and GitHub's human-centered workflow does not scale when many software agents modify the same codebase. It identifies four resulting problems: code review bottlenecks, blocking merge conflicts, unstructured CI output that consumes agent context, and missing provenance for auditing and rollback. ### Source excerpt . [What Replaces Git When Agents Write the Code](what-replaces-git-when-agents-write-the-code-cover... ## Tinder cuts app cold starts by 47% with new R8 Configuration Analyzer DevFeed: [Tinder cuts app cold starts by 47% with new R8 Configuration Analyzer]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Android Developers (noreply@blogger.com) Published: 2026-08-18T18:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Android Developers Blog]() Topics: [R8](), [Android](), [Optimization](), [configuration](), [audit]() Tags: [android](), [anr](), [audit](), [configuration](), [metrics](), [obfuscation](), [optimization](), [r8]() ### AI overview This developer case study explains how Tinder used the R8 Configuration Analyzer to identify and remove keep-rule blockers in its Android application. The reported results were a 47% reduction in cold-start time, a 28.98% reduction in download size to 61.5 MB, and a 28% reduction in user-perceived ANRs. The article also describes analyzer metrics for shrinking, optimization, and obfuscation, along with an R8 Analyzer skill for agentic development workflows. ### Source excerpt Posted by Ajesh R Pai, Developer Relations Engineer, Ulises Uriel Verduzco Diaz, Software Engineer, Tinder, and Tracy Agyemang, Product Marketing Manager Tinder is on a mission to power and inspire real connections by making meeting easy and fun for every new generation of singles. However, as their Android application codebase grew in size, so did its complexity. Prior to their latest optimization efforts, approximately 70% of the application was not optimized, carrying 17 dex files,including three dedicated just to startup. Although they had enabled R8, much of its optimization potential was blocked due to keep rules, and the team was unable to identify which specific rules were preventing optimization. To reduce startup time and decrease user-perceived Application Not Responding (ANR) errors, Tinder turned to the new R8 Configuration Analyzer to tackle these challenges. By utilizing the R8 Configuration Analyzer, Tinder successfully identified and removed unintentional optimization blockers. The results were immediate and impactful: Tinder achieved a 47% reduction in app cold starts, shrank their app download size by 28.98% (down to 61.5 MB), and reduced user-perceived ANRs by 28%. Configuration analyzer The R8 Configuration Analyzer shows R8 optimization by tracking shrinking, optimization, and obfuscation scores to show available refinement areas. It shows the broad, redundant, or obsolete keep rules, including those from external libraries so that you can analyse the keep rule impact and refine the keep rules. Key metrics shown in Configuration Analyzer include: Shrinking Score: Code percentage available for R8 shrinking. Optimization Score: Code percentage open to optimization (for example, method inlining, horizontal class merging). Obfuscation Score: Percentage of classes, methods and fields that can be renamed by R8 to decrease size. Use the analyzer to audit keep rules and their impacts: Find broad rules: Narrow the scope of package-wide rules that restri ## Using a Local Proxy to Centralize AI Tool Routing, Logging, and Policy DevFeed: [Using a Local Proxy to Centralize AI Tool Routing, Logging, and Policy]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Philipp Lehmann (philipp.lehmann@gruppe.ai) Published: 2026-08-18T07:00:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Philipp Lehmann]() Topics: [proxy](), [API](), [audit](), [configuration](), [Self-hosted]() Tags: [api](), [audit](), [configuration](), [llm](), [proxy](), [python](), [security](), [self-hosted]() ### AI overview The article proposes routing every model-using tool on a developer machine through one local proxy. This centralizes endpoint selection, request logging, auditing, and enforcement of policies such as keeping sensitive project code on a self-hosted model. It notes that tools with hardcoded or otherwise unsupported upstream configuration can bypass the proxy. ### Source excerpt OPENAI_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8080/v1 for every AI tool: one local FastAPI proxy that logs each request and refuses internal-only projects. ## Where Apollo MCP Server Stands on the OWASP MCP Top 10 DevFeed: [Where Apollo MCP Server Stands on the OWASP MCP Top 10]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Camille Lawrence Published: 2026-08-14T17:11:10Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Apollo Blog]() Topics: [Model Context Protocol](), [MCP Server](), [audit](), [Shared Responsibility Model](), [configuration](), [GraphQL](), [Rust](), [Self-hosted]() Tags: [announcement](), [apollo](), [apollo-mcp-server](), [audit](), [configuration](), [graphql](), [hardening](), [mcp](), [mcp-server](), [rust](), [self-hosted](), [shared-responsibility]() ### AI overview This article evaluates Apollo MCP Server against all ten risks in the latest reviewed OWASP MCP Top 10 revision. It finds that the server's architecture directly closes one risk because typed GraphQL operations are parsed and type-checked without shell execution. The remaining risks require configuration, monitoring, and team-owned security decisions. ### Source excerpt Architecture alone closes 1 of the ten risks in OWASP's MCP Top 10. See how Apollo MCP Server scores on the rest, and which configuration choices remain yours. [Next page]()