# Testing Software testing is a software-engineering discipline concerned with evaluating software throughout its development lifecycle. This is one page of public article previews, not the complete archive. Follow Next page to continue. Summaries are not the original full articles. ## Write End-to-End Tests in Your Backend's Language DevFeed: [Write End-to-End Tests in Your Backend's Language]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: James McConkey Published: 2026-09-17T12:00:42Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Atomic Object]() Topics: [Testing](), [Playwright](), [FastAPI](), [Python](), [test data](), [Pydantic](), [SQLAlchemy](), [ASP.NET Core](), [PostgreSQL](), [Docker Compose]() Tags: [asp-net-core](), [code](), [data](), [docker-compose](), [fastapi](), [playwright](), [postgresql](), [project-team-management](), [python](), [sqlalchemy](), [tests](), [the-software-life]() ### AI overview This article argues that end-to-end test-data setup is often the main design challenge, because tests must create consistent domain records while running alongside other tests. It recommends using browser-testing tools in the backend's language when possible, keeping meaningful relationships inline, and extracting small creation helpers without hiding scenario intent. ### Source excerpt The browser is often the easiest part of an end-to-end test. Consider a test that verifies a user can complete an overdue task. The visible interaction is small: sign in, find the task, click Complete, and observe the new status. Before any of that can happen, the test needs a workspace, a user, a project, and [...] The post Write End-to-End Tests in Your Backend's Language appeared first on Atomic Spin. ## Build Trust on a Short Software Project DevFeed: [Build Trust on a Short Software Project]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Viviana Rosas Published: 2026-09-17T12:00:17Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Atomic Object]() Topics: [trust](), [Software](), [Testing]() Tags: [client](), [progress](), [project](), [project-communication](), [project-team-management](), [regression](), [testing](), [the-software-life](), [trust]() ### AI overview This article explains how software teams can build client trust during short projects. It recommends frequent feedback and check-ins, making progress visible, and using a limited regression test suite focused on important functionality. ### Source excerpt On a short project, clients need evidence not only that work is happening, but that the team knows when to continue, when to change direction, when to raise concern, and how to leave others capable of carrying the work forward. 1. Close the Feedback Loop - Show Responsiveness. It's extremely important to get feedback quickly [...] The post Build Trust on a Short Software Project appeared first on Atomic Spin. ## ASUS KGPE-D16, KCMA-D8 and KFSN4-DRE re-added to Libreboot DevFeed: [ASUS KGPE-D16, KCMA-D8 and KFSN4-DRE re-added to Libreboot]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Leah Rowe Published: 2026-09-17T04:32:50.666044Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [News about Libreboot releases and development]() Topics: [ASUS](), [releases](), [Testing](), [Zig]() Tags: [announcement](), [article](), [asus](), [bios](), [canoeboot](), [coreboot](), [free-software](), [libre](), [libreboot](), [news](), [opensource](), [testing](), [uefi]() ### AI overview Libreboot re-added support for the ASUS KFSN4-DRE, KCMA-D8, and KGPE-D16 boards to its automated build system. The boards were available for source builds and were expected in the next regular Libreboot release, with testing requested. ### Source excerpt Article: ASUS KGPE-D16, KCMA-D8 and KFSN4-DRE re-added to Libreboot Web link: https://libreboot.org/news/fam15h.html ## August 2023: New coreboot, SeaBIOS and GRUB revisions in Libreboot (testers needed!) DevFeed: [August 2023: New coreboot, SeaBIOS and GRUB revisions in Libreboot (testers needed!)]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Leah Rowe Published: 2026-09-17T04:32:50.666044Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [News about Libreboot releases and development]() Topics: [libreboot](), [coreboot](), [Testing](), [releases]() Tags: [bios](), [canoeboot](), [coreboot](), [free-software](), [grub](), [libre](), [libreboot](), [opensource](), [patches](), [release](), [testing](), [uefi]() ### AI overview Libreboot's August 2023 update introduces newer coreboot, SeaBIOS, and GRUB revisions, including a coreboot tree based on the 2 August revision. The update is not precompiled and requires source compilation, with testing requested before the next testing release. ### Source excerpt Article: August 2023: New coreboot, SeaBIOS and GRUB revisions in Libreboot (testers needed!) Web link: https://libreboot.org/news/update202308.html ## What to Expect at the Zephyr Project Workshop & Meetup (September 24, 2026) - Stuttgart, Germany DevFeed: [What to Expect at the Zephyr Project Workshop & Meetup (September 24, 2026) - Stuttgart, Germany]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Susan Remmert Published: 2026-09-16T17:57:36Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Zephyr Project]() Topics: [Embedded Systems](), [Open Source](), [Application Development](), [Testing](), [Simulation](), [Command-line interface]() Tags: [2026](), [blog](), [command-line](), [developers](), [embedded-systems](), [events](), [germany](), [meetup](), [open-source](), [technical](), [workshop](), [zephyr]() ### AI overview The Zephyr community will hold a hands-on workshop and afternoon meetup in Stuttgart, Germany, on September 24, 2026. The workshop will cover practical Zephyr development, while the meetup will feature community-led technical presentations and networking. ### Source excerpt On September 24, the Zephyr community will gather in Stuttgart for a hands-on workshop followed by an afternoon meetup featuring community-led technical presentations. The event is open to experienced contributors, first-time users, students, engineers, and anyone interested in open source embedded development. Attendees may join both sessions or choose either the workshop or the meetup based on their interests. ## What to Expect at the Zephyr Project Workshop & Meetup (September 24, 2026) - Stuttgart, Germany DevFeed: [What to Expect at the Zephyr Project Workshop & Meetup (September 24, 2026) - Stuttgart, Germany]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Susan Remmert Published: 2026-09-16T17:57:36Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [Zephyr Project]() Topics: [Embedded Systems](), [Embedded Software Dev](), [Application Development](), [Testing](), [Simulation](), [Open Source]() Tags: [2026](), [blog](), [command-line](), [community](), [contributors](), [development](), [embedded](), [embedded-systems](), [event](), [events](), [germany](), [meetup](), [open-source](), [sessions](), [simulation](), [technical](), [testing](), [workshop](), [zephyr]() ### AI overview The Zephyr community will hold a hands-on workshop and afternoon meetup in Stuttgart, Germany, on September 24, 2026. The program includes guided exercises, technical presentations, community networking, and discussions of Zephyr-based embedded applications. ### Source excerpt On September 24, the Zephyr community will gather in Stuttgart for a hands-on workshop followed by an afternoon meetup featuring community-led technical presentations. The event is open to experienced contributors, first-time users, students, engineers, and anyone interested in open source embedded development. Attendees may join both sessions or choose either the workshop or the meetup based on their interests. ## Test GitHub Actions Locally with Act DevFeed: [Test GitHub Actions Locally with Act]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Valerie Nielson Published: 2026-09-16T12:00:44Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Atomic Object]() Topics: [GitHub Actions](), [CI/CD](), [Docker](), [Testing](), [unit test]() Tags: [ci-cd](), [developer-tools](), [docker](), [github](), [github-actions](), [pull-request](), [testing](), [unit-test](), [workflow]() ### AI overview This tutorial explains how to test GitHub Actions workflows locally with act. It describes how act uses Docker to reproduce the workflow environment, including environment variables and the file system, and demonstrates testing pull-request workflows and unit tests before merging. ### Source excerpt GitHub Actions are a great way to implement CI/CD into your projects, whether personal or professional. GitHub has a lot of great tools to help with CI/CD, but GitHub Actions in particular is very helpful. However, writing actions can be tedious and a little annoying, especially if you don't know what you're doing. On top [...] The post Test GitHub Actions Locally with Act appeared first on Atomic Spin. ## Automating App Store Screenshots DevFeed: [Automating App Store Screenshots]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Khan Academy Published: 2017-03-27T22:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Khan Academy]() Topics: [iOS](), [ui-testing](), [Xcode](), [Sketch](), [Mobile](), [Testing]() Tags: [app-store](), [design](), [engineering](), [fastlane](), [ios](), [iphone](), [mobile](), [news](), [screenshots](), [testing](), [ui-testing](), [xcode]() ### AI overview A tutorial describing how Khan Academy automated App Store and Play Store screenshots with Xcode UI tests, Fastlane, a Snapfile, and a homegrown Sketch file. The team reduced screenshot update time from about a week to about an hour. ### Source excerpt By Bryan Clark One of the more tedious design tasks is keeping your App Store promo images up-to-date. ... Read more ## Prototyping with Framer DevFeed: [Prototyping with Framer]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Khan Academy Published: 2016-10-03T22:00:00Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Khan Academy]() Topics: [Testing](), [coding](), [backends]() Tags: [backends](), [engineering](), [framer](), [news](), [prototype](), [prototyping](), [user-testing](), [web-frontend]() ### AI overview Khan Academy describes how it uses prototypes in user testing to gather feedback on new designs. The article explains the role of low- and high-fidelity prototypes, their limited lifespan, and the choice of Framer for creating and revising prototypes quickly. ### Source excerpt By Nick Breen We strive to make all of Khan Academy's new features & experiences easy to understand ... Read more ## tota11y - an accessibility visualization toolkit DevFeed: [tota11y - an accessibility visualization toolkit]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Khan Academy Published: 2015-06-08T22:00:00Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Khan Academy]() Topics: [Accessibility](), [audit](), [Testing](), [Tooling](), [browser](), [Chrome]() Tags: [accessibility](), [accessibility-testing](), [audit](), [browser](), [chrome](), [developer-tools](), [engineering](), [frontend](), [linter](), [news](), [testing](), [tests](), [tooling](), [unit-tests](), [visualization](), [web](), [web-frontend]() ### AI overview Khan Academy announces tota11y, an accessibility visualization toolkit designed to make manual accessibility testing easier for developers. The article describes its development and use of browser-based annotations to help teams understand and fix accessibility issues. ### Source excerpt By Jordan Scales Today we're releasing tota11y (on GitHub), an accessibility visualization toolkit that aims to reduce the ... Read more ## How sandbox boundaries affect AI coding agent evaluations DevFeed: [How sandbox boundaries affect AI coding agent evaluations]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Waldek Mastykarz Published: 2026-09-16T09:09:51Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Developer Blogs]() Topics: [AI-assisted coding](), [Testing](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [coding]() Tags: [agent-experience](), [ai](), [ai-coding](), [ax](), [coding](), [developers](), [eval](), [evaluation](), [measurement](), [sandbox]() ### AI overview The article explains that an AI coding agent evaluation can produce misleading scores when the agent retrieves answers from its prompt, environment, or other accessible resources. It argues that evaluators should define the capability being tested and set information boundaries accordingly, including restricting access to evidence when measuring internal model knowledge. ### Source excerpt Your AI coding agent passed the eval. But did the model know the answer, or did it find it somewhere on your machine? A correct answer can still invalidate your measurement. The post Your AI coding agent evaluation is only as good as its sandbox appeared first on Microsoft for Developers. ## Priyanka Halder on responsible AI, software quality, and scaling technology strategy DevFeed: [Priyanka Halder on responsible AI, software quality, and scaling technology strategy]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Rajrupa Roychowdhury Published: 2026-09-16T08:22:04Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [BrowserStack Blog]() Topics: [Testing](), [AI Engineering](), [Responsibility & Safety](), [AI Strategy](), [legacy]() Tags: [ai-engineering](), [cloud-native](), [engineering](), [icons-of-quality](), [quality](), [responsible-ai](), [software](), [testing]() ### AI overview BrowserStack profiles Priyanka Halder, an engineering executive at Deloitte, discussing responsible AI at scale, software quality, buy-versus-build decisions, and the skills needed to create scalable solutions with measurable business value. ### Source excerpt To celebrate the relentless passion and invaluable contributions of leaders in software quality, BrowserStack is proud to Icons of Quality. ## Honoring #IconsOfQuality: Huib Schoots DevFeed: [Honoring #IconsOfQuality: Huib Schoots]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Rajrupa Roychowdhury Published: 2026-09-16T08:21:48Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [BrowserStack Blog]() Topics: [Testing](), [Software Testing](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Software Engineering]() Tags: [ai](), [icons-of-quality](), [quality](), [software-testing](), [thought-leadership]() ### AI overview An interview with Huib Schoots explores software testing as a thinking activity centered on questioning assumptions, exploring risks, and helping teams make better decisions. Schoots also discusses using AI to support testing while preserving human judgment. ### Source excerpt To celebrate the relentless passion and invaluable contributions of leaders in software quality, BrowserStack is proud to honour Icons of Quality. ## Honoring #IconsOfQuality: Ash Winter DevFeed: [Honoring #IconsOfQuality: Ash Winter]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Rajrupa Roychowdhury Published: 2026-09-16T08:21:31Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [BrowserStack Blog]() Topics: [Testing](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Large Language Model](), [Development]() Tags: [contributions](), [icons-of-quality](), [testing](), [thought-leadership]() ### AI overview BrowserStack highlights Ash Winter as an influential figure in software testing and quality. The article describes Winter's work in testability, exploratory testing, community collaboration, and the use of automation pipelines and LLMs to support testers. ### Source excerpt To celebrate the relentless passion and invaluable contributions of leaders in software quality, BrowserStack is proud to honour Icons of Quality. ## Honoring #IconsOfQuality: Pricilla Bilavendran DevFeed: [Honoring #IconsOfQuality: Pricilla Bilavendran]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Rajrupa Roychowdhury Published: 2026-09-16T08:21:09Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [BrowserStack Blog]() Topics: [Testing](), [Test automation](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [Playwright](), [Postman](), [Amazon Machine Learning]() Tags: [ai](), [api-testing](), [community](), [icons-of-quality](), [playwright](), [postman](), [quality](), [test-automation](), [testing]() ### AI overview BrowserStack profiles Pricilla Bilavendran, a quality engineering and API testing leader, and discusses her views on AI-assisted quality engineering, human curiosity, critical thinking, and the continuing importance of testers' judgment. ### Source excerpt To celebrate the relentless passion and invaluable contributions of leaders in software quality, BrowserStack is proud to honour Icons of Quality. ## Honoring #IconsOfQuality: Mark Hrynczak DevFeed: [Honoring #IconsOfQuality: Mark Hrynczak]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Rajrupa Roychowdhury Published: 2026-09-16T08:20:52Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [BrowserStack Blog]() Topics: [Testing](), [Loop Engineering](), [Artificial Intelligence](), [site-reliability-engineering](), [Amazon Web Services](), [atlassian]() Tags: [agentic](), [ai](), [atlassian](), [aws](), [icons-of-quality](), [quality](), [sre](), [testing](), [tooling]() ### AI overview BrowserStack profiles Mark Hrynczak, Canva's Head of Quality and QA Director, discussing how distributed quality ownership, agentic testing, and AI-driven decision support can help engineering teams move faster while maintaining reliability. ### Source excerpt To celebrate the relentless passion and invaluable contributions of leaders in software quality, BrowserStack is proud to honour Icons of Quality. ## CoreOS 45 Test Week DevFeed: [CoreOS 45 Test Week]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Lukáš Růžička Published: 2026-09-16T08:00:00Z Content type: news Language: en Sources: [Fedora Magazine]() Topics: [Fedora](), [Testing](), [Wiki]() Tags: [2026](), [bugs](), [community](), [contribution](), [coreos](), [download](), [event](), [fedora-linux-45](), [fedora-project-community](), [qa](), [release](), [test-week](), [testing]() ### AI overview Fedora CoreOS and QA teams are organizing a Test Week beginning September 21, 2026, to help the community test Fedora CoreOS based on Fedora 45 content before it reaches the testing and stable streams. ### Source excerpt The Fedora CoreOS and QA teams are gearing up for Fedora 45, and we need your help! We are organizing a Fedora CoreOS Test Week starting on September 21, 2026. This event is a great opportunity for the community to test Fedora CoreOS (FCOS) based on Fedora 45 content before it officially reaches the testing [...] ## Using acceptance tests to catch regression bugs in legacy code before production DevFeed: [Using acceptance tests to catch regression bugs in legacy code before production]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Valentina Jemuović Published: 2026-09-16T07:33:58Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [Optivem Journal]() Topics: [Testing](), [Requirements](), [legacy]() Tags: [automated](), [bugs](), [e2e](), [legacy-code](), [regression](), [requirements](), [testing](), [ui](), [unit-tests]() ### AI overview This hands-on article explains why automated unit and end-to-end tests may still allow production bugs in legacy code. It presents acceptance test-driven development (ATDD), where requirements and tests describe the same observable behavior, making coverage clearer and reducing dependence on UI steps. ### Source excerpt You automated, and manual regression testing is still there. Those two facts have the same cause. ## How to test an AI agent policy before enforcing it DevFeed: [How to test an AI agent policy before enforcing it]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: WorkOS Published: 2026-09-15T22:03:24Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [WorkOS Blog]() Topics: [AI Agent](), [Authorization](), [Testing](), [Access Control](), [Linear]() Tags: [access-control](), [ai-agent](), [authorization](), [how-to](), [testing]() ### AI overview This guide explains how to test authorization policies for AI agents before enforcing them. It presents reusable tests for role-based access control, task intent, organizational rules, and approval requirements, with checks against the connected service. ### Source excerpt Design and test AI agent policies that block unsafe actions and keep useful work moving. Learn to test intent, RBAC, and approvals, or try WorkOS Airlock. ## The 3 Layers of Testing AI Agents DevFeed: [The 3 Layers of Testing AI Agents]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: The T-Shaped Dev Published: 2026-09-15T20:59:04Z Content type: tutorial Language: en Sources: [The T-Shaped Dev]() Topics: [Testing](), [Artificial Intelligence]() Tags: [agents](), [ai](), [ai-agents](), [how-to](), [testing]() ### AI overview The article presents a three-layer approach to testing AI agents: deterministic tests for surrounding code such as tools, schemas, routing, state, and failure policies; judged scenarios for model behavior; and continuous production evaluations. ### Source excerpt Draw the line between the model and the machine, and 80% of agent testing is testing you already know how to do. (7 min) ## How automated testing improves development of complex features DevFeed: [How automated testing improves development of complex features]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Dan Lew Published: 2026-09-15T13:16:49Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [Dan Lew Blog]() Topics: [Testing](), [coding](), [Concurrency](), [Database]() Tags: [automated](), [concurrency](), [database](), [regression](), [testing]() ### AI overview The author contrasts manual testing with automated testing while developing job cancellation in a work queue. Automated tests help expose concurrency and regression risks, cover corner cases, and simulate mid-execution cancellation more reliably. ### Source excerpt It's hard for me to overstate how much my coding has improved since embracing automated testing. And yet, I used to think of it as a waste of time! This post is for my former self, demonstrating why I embrace the practice now. Allow me to demonstrate with ## Sound Open Firmware 2.15 Released With AMD ACP 7.x Support, Intel UAOL DevFeed: [Sound Open Firmware 2.15 Released With AMD ACP 7.x Support, Intel UAOL]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Michael Larabel Published: 2026-09-15T13:04:40Z Content type: release Language: en Sources: [Phoronix]() Topics: [Embedded Software Dev](), [Open Source](), [intel](), [Security](), [qemu](), [Xtensa](), [Fuzzing/Fuzz testing](), [POSIX](), [Testing]() Tags: [desktop-linux](), [driver](), [dsp](), [firmware](), [fuzzing](), [intel](), [linux-benchmarking](), [linux-hardware-benchmarks](), [linux-hardware-reviews](), [linux-how-to](), [linux-performance](), [linux-server-benchmarks](), [open](), [open-source-graphics](), [phoronix](), [phoronix-test-suite](), [posix](), [processor](), [qemu](), [security](), [testing](), [ubuntu-benchmarks](), [ubuntu-hardware](), [usb](), [xtensa]() ### AI overview Sound Open Firmware 2.15 adds user-space, memory-protected module execution, AMD ACP 7.x and NXP i.MX8MP support, Intel UAOL USB audio offload, testing targets, security hardening, and new audio processing modules. ### Source excerpt Sound Open Firmware as the open-source, vendor-independent audio DSP firmware stack and driver framework is out today with a new feature update... ## Review argues 1Password's AI patching benchmark overstates poor patch quality DevFeed: [Review argues 1Password's AI patching benchmark overstates poor patch quality]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: "Anish Naik"; "Dan Guido"; "Benjamin Samuels"; "Marcelo Morales" Published: 2026-09-15T11:00:00Z Content type: opinion Language: en Sources: [The Trail of Bits Blog](), [The Trail of Bits Blog]() Topics: [Artificial Intelligence](), [Benchmark](), [Vulnerabilities](), [Testing](), [Agent Skills]() Tags: [agent-skills](), [agents](), [ai](), [benchmark](), [open-source](), [patch-the-planet](), [report](), [testing](), [vulnerabilities]() ### AI overview The article argues that 1Password's 26% clean-fix headline gives a misleading picture of AI patching because the benchmark included difficult vulnerabilities, prompts instructing agents to apply wrong fixes, trials that prohibited testing, and differing reasoning settings. It reports that 2,634 of 3,067 eligible patches blocked the supplied exploit and announces two agent skills for validation and review. ### Source excerpt 1Password's FLAWED report, published on August 6, 2026, gives defenders a misleading picture of AI patching. Its headline says models produced clean fixes only 26% of the time. That figure includes experiments that deliberately instructed agents to apply the wrong fix, along with experiments in which agents could not compile or test their patches. The report risks making defenders less effective by discouraging them from using technology that could help them fix more vulnerabilities. Teams that take its headline at face value may leave repairable vulnerabilities unaddressed. We want our work to help defenders fix more vulnerabilities. This post shares real-world data on human and agent patch quality from our consulting projects and Patch the Planet. We're also releasing two agent skills: post-patch-validation to help agents test fixes, and review-walkthrough to help engineers review them. How the experiment produces a misleading headline Our review of 1Password's code and data found four choices that make its 26% clean-fix rate a misleading guide to ordinary patching work.1 The sample was selected for difficult fixes. The authors chose six vulnerabilities because their fixes were complex. Clean-fix rates ranged from 3% to 60% across those bugs, so the average depends heavily on which vulnerabilities made the list.2 Two prompts tell agents to apply the wrong fix. Those prompts account for 22% of the data. Combining them with ordinary repair attempts makes the reported rate depend partly on how often the researchers chose to give agents bad advice. More than a third of the trials prohibit testing. One evaluation mode prevents agents from building or running code and accounts for 36% of the data. The headline combines those trials with experiments in which agents could test their patches and act on the results. The models ran at different reasoning settings. GPT-5.5 ran at medium effort and Opus 4.8 at high. These were the tools' defaults. Neither model was tested at i ## B2B Medical & Pharma UX Benchmark: 3,400+ Performance Scores and 2,600+ Best Practice Examples DevFeed: [B2B Medical & Pharma UX Benchmark: 3,400+ Performance Scores and 2,600+ Best Practice Examples]() Original publisher: [Read original article]() Author: Anders Nielsen Published: 2026-09-15T09:30:00Z Content type: article Language: en Sources: [Baymard Institute]() Topics: [User experience (UX)](), [Testing](), [web applications](), [Mobile]() Tags: [b2b](), [benchmark](), [desktop](), [ecommerce](), [mobile](), [performance](), [research](), [testing](), [ux]() ### AI overview Baymard reports on a UX benchmark covering 10 B2B Medical & Pharma ecommerce sites, assessed across more than 400 research-based UX parameters. The sites ranged from poor to mediocre overall, with recurring issues in product information, pricing, search, and collaborative cart workflows. ### Source excerpt (Note: Unfortunately, e-mail and RSS don't support advanced layouts and features. If the graphics in this article look strange, you may want to read the article in your web browser.) At Baymard, we've just released a new UX benchmark with 10 "B2B Medical & Pharma" UX case studies. This follows from our large-scale user testing and adds to our existing ecommerce UX benchmark. In this article, we give you a snapshot of the overall UX performance. 10 B2B Medical & Pharma UX Case Studies and the Overall Performance AbCam mediocre B2B Medical & Pharma 40 page designs: desktop, mobile Waters mediocre B2B Medical & Pharma 38 page designs: desktop, mobile Allegro Medical mediocre B2B Medical & Pharma 41 page designs: desktop, mobile Medline mediocre B2B Medical & Pharma 25 page designs: desktop, mobile Cole-Parmer mediocre B2B Medical & Pharma 50 page designs: desktop, mobile Mckesson poor B2B Medical & Pharma 22 page designs: desktop, mobile Thermo Fisher poor B2B Medical & Pharma 42 page designs: desktop, mobile Henry Schein poor B2B Medical & Pharma 38 page designs: desktop, mobile Bound Tree Medical poor B2B Medical & Pharma 41 page designs: desktop, mobile Sigma Aldrich poor B2B Medical & Pharma 41 page designs: desktop, mobile YourSite.com? Want to know how your site performs? Get Premium access to review your own site or have it audited by Baymard researchers. These are the 10 in-depth B2B Medical & Pharma UX case studies. The 10 sites have been manually assessed across 400+ research-based UX parameters relevant to B2B Medical & Pharma, resulting in 3,400+ weighted UX performance scores and 2,600+ best practice examples from these desktop and mobile sites. Each of the 3,400+ UX performance scores from the 10 B2B Medical & Pharma case studies is summarized in the interactive scatterplot below -- showing you how they perform collectively and individually: {{ scatterplot-graph: size=big + habitat=public + base-sites=collection:medical-pharma + view-structure-id=gemini-st [Next page]()